Re: mysql server 5.0.37 is slow

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:17:44PM +0800, David Xu wrote: The mysql server 5.0.37 built from ports with default configuration is too slow, I found I must put --disable-profiling into Makefile's CONFIGURE_ARGS to bring it back to normal performance. Yeah, that made me

Re: net/rdesktop segfault

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:48:13 +0200 Thomas Spreng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Spreng wrote: Hi, Duane Hill wrote: From the stand point of a fresh FBSD 6.2 install, rdesktop 1.5.0 works fine here using xorg 7.2. I just logged into an XP pro and 2000 server without a segfault.

Re: net/rdesktop segfault

If I apply the patch (which I attached in one of my earlier posts) everything runs fine, regardless what color depth is used. Kind of new to path...please help me, how do I apply it? as I have mentioned in the message containing the patch. The following procedure should do the trick

subversion -- compile file - requires lgssapi_krb5

compiling on: # uname -a FreeBSD ___ 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:15:57 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP amd64 2 -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/db42 -rpath /usr/local/lib -o libsvn_ra_dav-1.la commit.lo fetch.lo file_revs.lo log.lo

Re: ./options-descr file suggestion for ports

On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to submit patches for them.

Re: ./options-descr file suggestion for ports

Vivek Khera wrote: On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to submit patches

Re: ./options-descr file suggestion for ports

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Vivek Khera wrote: On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free

Re: make update broken

Alex Dupre wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze ha scritto: Make update is broken on my system. Due to the removal of PORTSNAP_UPDATE it now complains about a missing PORTSSUPFILE (SUP_UPDATE is defined for updating /usr/src) instead of using portsnap. I've already notified portmgr and proposed two

Re: subversion -- compile file - requires lgssapi_krb5

On Wednesday 13 June 2007 07:24:23 Scot Hetzel wrote: On 6/13/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: compiling on: # uname -a FreeBSD ___ 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:15:57 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP amd64 2

Re: make update broken

[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: It still seems not to be fixed and I cannot find the PR either. Can you give me the number? I didn't open a PR, I contacted directly who proposed/committed that change and portmgr. But after a couple of mail exchanges nobody took a final decision (i.e. I'm still waiting a

Re: make update broken

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:47:41PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: It still seems not to be fixed and I cannot find the PR either. Can you give me the number? I didn't open a PR, I contacted directly who proposed/committed that change and portmgr. But after a couple of

Re: make update broken

Erwin Lansing wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:47:41PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: It still seems not to be fixed and I cannot find the PR either. Can you give me the number? I didn't open a PR, I contacted directly who proposed/committed that change and portmgr. But

openoffice.org SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=true, anyone else?

Hello, does someone else see this as well? : I now need to set SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=true in order to correctly run openoffice.org (June 11 world ports x86-stable). Otherwise it will almost immediately quit after lauch; gdb does not learn me more than 'Program exited with code 0116.' I worked OK

Re: openoffice.org SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=true, anyone else?

Arno J. Klaassen wrote: Hello, does someone else see this as well? : I now need to set SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=true in order to correctly run openoffice.org (June 11 world ports x86-stable). Otherwise it will almost immediately quit after lauch; gdb does not learn me more than 'Program

Re: make update broken

Erwin Lansing wrote: As I described earlier, SUP_UPDATE, CVS_UPDATE and PORTSNAP_UPDATE are mutually exclusive and cannot be used at the same time. That it worked before was an artifact which has been fixed. That is doesn't work anymore means the designed behaviour finally has been fixed and

Re: mail/postfix on Current (-DFREEBSD#)

On 6/13/07, Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use FreeBSD on a lot of mailservers in combination with postfix. When i compile on FreeBSD 5 i see messages like: cc -DHAS_PCRE -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -I. -DFREEBSD5 -c format_tv.c On FreeBSD 6 they look like : cc -DHAS_PCRE

FreeBSD Port: usermin-1.280

Hi, I'm getting a checksum error for this update. I think there may be a fault in the install script. Kind regards Claus Krogsgaard smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: ports cross compiling

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:11:41 -0400 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:35:10PM -0400, Z.C.B. wrote: Any suggestions on how to cross compile ports? It's almost entirely unsupported by the individual ports. So ones best option is qemu?