On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:08:31PM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:00:18AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
For those updating to recent 8-current, make fetchindex fails as follows:
% cd /usr/ports
% make fetchindex
fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-8.bz2:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Giancarlo Rubio wrote:
I'm trying to build mod_perl, and get errors when building dependency p5-GSSAPI.
The error
= GSSAPI-0.24.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
= Attempting to fetch from
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
Here is a full dump:
--- Upgrading 'xfs-1.0.4_4,1' to 'xfs-1.0.5,1' (x11-fonts/xfs)
--- Building '/usr/ports/x11-fonts/xfs'
=== Cleaning for xfs-1.0.5,1
=== Extracting for xfs-1.0.5,1
= MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/app/xfs-1.0.5.tar.bz2.
= SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/app/xfs-1.0.5.tar.bz2.
===
I’m trying
to upgrade apache 2.2.6_1 to apache 2.2.6_2 with portupgrade –a . My
portupgrade version is portupgrade-2.3.1,2
and my m4 version is m4-1.4.9,1.
After a
successfull compiled (at least I can’t see any error), the process stop during
the installing of the new version with this
The FBSD port is deadly out of date:
# $FreeBSD: ports/devel/pear-PHPUnit3/Makefile,v 1.20 2007/06/26
08:09:31 pav Exp $
#
PORTNAME= PHPUnit
PORTVERSION=3.0.6
PORTREVISION= 1
It's 3.0.6 PL1. I'm attempting to update it to 3.1.9 now. I noticed the
port is flagged as
Brian Josefsen wrote:
Hello all
I installed the openoffice package
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.3.0/i386/FreeBSD6/OOo_2.3.0_FreeBSD62Intel_install_da.tbz
yesterday, now when i try to execute openoffice.org-2.3.0 it complaints
about libstdc++.so.6 is missing. As
I’m trying to upgrade from apache 2.2.6_1
to apache 2.2.6_2
with portupgrade –a . My
portupgrade version is
portupgrade-2.3.1,2 and my m4
version is m4-1.4.9,1 (all my otherports are updated).
After a successfull compiled (at
least I can’t see any error),
the process stop during the
I just realized I sent my previous email to ports@ instead of to the
ports mailing list. Argh. Sorry about that. I will resend to the
list.
My apologies.
--
Chess Griffin
GPG Public Key: 0x0C7558C3
http://www.chessgriffin.com
pgp0ZnRS2QToc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello-
I am working on some small cleanup patches to a couple port Makefiles
and had a few questions on how to handle man/info pages.
I have come across a couple Makefiles that have something like this in
post-install:
.if defined(NOPORTDOCS)
...
.else
MAN1= portname.1
INFO= portname
Quoting Philipp Ost [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Read the entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Robert been there, followed directions, everything works Huff
It didn't work quite that well for me. I followed the instructions
in
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chess Griffin wrote:
I just realized I sent my previous email to ports@ instead of to the
ports mailing list. Argh. Sorry about that. I will resend to the
list.
In general, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The two can be used interchangeably.
* Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-12 12:21:35]:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chess Griffin wrote:
I just realized I sent my previous email to ports@ instead of to the
ports mailing list. Argh. Sorry about that. I will resend to the
list.
In general, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just an alias
Hello-
I am working on some small cleanup patches to a couple port Makefiles
and had a few questions on how to handle man/info pages.
I have come across a couple Makefiles that have something like this in
post-install:
.if defined(NOPORTDOCS)
...
.else
MAN1= portname.1
INFO= portname
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
This is because:
MASTER_SITES= http://pear.phpunit.de/get/
Is set, but MASTER_SITES gets set back to pear.php.net later using:
Updated (w/ massive manual file list intervention):
Makefile unambiguously stolen from ports/devel/pear-PHPUnit3:
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~seklecki/pear-Testing_Selenium_bas.tar
For use in ports/devel/pear-Testing_Selenium/
~BAS
$ pear list-files Testing_Selenium
Installed Files For Testing_Selenium
20 matches
Mail list logo
