Re: Xorg initial resolution broken

2007-10-14 Thread Mark Knight
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Mark Knight wrote: Just restarted X after various Xorg updates. Now the server seems to be completely ignoring the Modes line in the config file's Screen/Display section and picking its own initial resolution. No problem

portsnap troubles?

2007-10-14 Thread Derkjan de Haan
Hi, Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any updates (i.e. the png security update) come through. Regards, Derkjan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: portsnap troubles?

2007-10-14 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote: Hi, Howyd, Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any updates (i.e. the png security update) come through. The server that builds the portsnap data is down due to hardware problems. I'm not sure

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2007-10-14 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the

Re: portsnap troubles?

2007-10-14 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2007.10.14 11:27:13 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote: Hi, Howyd, Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any updates (i.e. the png security update) come through. The server that builds the

Re: Xorg initial resolution broken

2007-10-14 Thread Randy Pratt
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:10:25 +0100 Mark Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Mark Knight wrote: Just restarted X after various Xorg updates. Now the server seems to be completely ignoring the Modes line in the config file's

FreeBSD Port: png-1.2.22

2007-10-14 Thread L. Derksen
Hello, I did get a message from portaudit that my 'png-1.2.18'-package was a security risk. So I updated my portstree with 'portsnap fetch update', deleted the png-package (make deinstall) and then tried to install the current png-package (1.2.22). Now the tree gives me the message: ===

mysql51-server won't start after upgrade

2007-10-14 Thread Jeffrey Williams
I just upgraded mysql51-server with cvsup and portupgrade. Now it won't start, and the error I am getting is: [ERROR] /usr/local/libexec/mysqld: unknown variable 'innodb_log_arch_dir=/var/db/mysql/' I have been scanning the release notes, but I haven't found anything yet, that indicates that

Re: Xorg initial resolution broken

2007-10-14 Thread Mark Knight
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes I'm having the same default resolution (1280x1024) problem using the updated xf86-video-mga-1.9.100 driver and additionally am unable to switch modes using the ctrl-alt-keypad +/- keys (Option Dont Zoom _is_ disabled). I

Re: FreeBSD Port: png-1.2.22

2007-10-14 Thread Tobias Roth
L. Derksen wrote: Hello, I did get a message from portaudit that my 'png-1.2.18'-package was a security risk. So I updated my portstree with 'portsnap fetch update', deleted the png-package (make deinstall) and then tried to install the current png-package (1.2.22). Now the tree gives me

Smarteiffel is marked broken but is not

2007-10-14 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Hi, lang/smarteiffel is marked BROKEN= does not install on FreeBSD = 7 but it builds and installs fine, and runs fine too on 7.0-PRERELEASE/i386 Anyway, if I am the only one user of this port we can remove it. SmartEiffel 1.2r7 seems quite dead. Regards.

I don't understand this

2007-10-14 Thread Paul Schmehl
I upgraded a server from php4 to php5. First I uninstalled php4. Then I uninstalled php4-extensions. Then I installed php5. Then I installed php5-extensions. Now, when I run portupgrade, I get a ton of complaints about php4 extensions that can't be updated. portupgrade -ai --- Session

Re: make errors in net-snmp-5.3.1

2007-10-14 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On 10/13/07, Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: currebt on amd64 cc -I../../include -I. -I../../agent -I../../agent/mibgroup -I../../snmplib -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement

Re: I don't understand this

2007-10-14 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 14, 2007 4:48:54 PM -0500 Josh Tolbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It really is pretty straightforward. You have to get rid of _all_ of php4 before you install php5, then make sure the portsdb is straightened out. I'm not sure why folks are having so much trouble with this... Well,

Re: I don't understand this

2007-10-14 Thread Josh Tolbert
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 04:37:43PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: I upgraded a server from php4 to php5. First I uninstalled php4. Then I uninstalled php4-extensions. Then I installed php5. Then I installed php5-extensions. Now, when I run portupgrade, I get a ton of complaints about php4

Re: I don't understand this

2007-10-14 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Paul Schmehl wrote: --On October 14, 2007 4:48:54 PM -0500 Josh Tolbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It really is pretty straightforward. You have to get rid of _all_ of php4 before you install php5, then make sure the portsdb is straightened out. I'm not sure why folks are having so much

Re: I don't understand this

2007-10-14 Thread Josh Tolbert
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 05:11:22PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On October 14, 2007 4:48:54 PM -0500 Josh Tolbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It really is pretty straightforward. You have to get rid of _all_ of php4 before you install php5, then make sure the portsdb is straightened out. I'm

Re: Smarteiffel is marked broken but is not

2007-10-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: Hi, lang/smarteiffel is marked BROKEN= does not install on FreeBSD = 7 but it builds and installs fine, and runs fine too on 7.0-PRERELEASE/i386 Check the error log on http://pointyhat.freebsd.org then try to determine why you are not seeing that error on your

Re: NOPORTDOCS and man/info pages

2007-10-14 Thread Chess Griffin
* Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-13 12:28:10]: So, my questions are: Is the above handling of the man and info pages correct? It seems the answer is no, but just thought I would check. Not really, but I guess there may be some special cases that warrant the handling

Ports using gcc 4.2 under FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE

2007-10-14 Thread Naram Qashat
I was wondering if it would be possible to test if a port would work properly with GCC 4.2 would help test for FreeBSD 7-CURRENT if I use the lang/gcc42 port while under 6.2-RELEASE. I want to test and see what does and doesn't compile, maybe to see if I could help the ports tree for 7-CURRENT