Sometime in late July or early August, something changed in the
infrastructure that broke installation of these 4 ports -- but only
on 5.x. The cause is still under investigation. If anyone has any
ideas, please let me know.
mcl
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: cvs commit: po
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PayPal's records indicate that you have not yet accepted the updated
PayPal User
Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Failure to accept the updated PayPal User Agreement and Privacy Policy
within 3
days will result in limited access to your PayPal account. If your
account
Hello and sorry for the noise,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:08:06 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> localhost# make WITH_APACHE="YES" USE_APACHE="2.2" all-depends-list
USE_APACHE shouldn't be used as a user variable.
APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 is the way to go.
WBR
--
bsam
__
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:06 +
RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My feeling is that it's not worth the effort, because most people that
> use the tarball only do so because of networking problems,
I think I slightly misunderstood that you're talking about the ports
tree on the install disk ra
Whats wrong here ? Did a portsnap update before ..
proxy2# make
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=> php-5.2.5.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from http://br.php.net/distributions/.
php-5.2.5.tar.bz2
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file
> with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think
> that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you
> could start from there
* Alex Dupre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed
> > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more
> > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file
> > with the tarball, and install it in
Doug Barton wrote:
> In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed
> up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more
> useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file
> with the tarball, and install it into some standard location?
A
