Please update x11-toolkits/fltk from 1.1.7 to current version

2007-11-25 Thread Sunry Chen
There's bug affect compiling remotely/in console: Fluid needs X connection to compile Fl_Help_View widgets(http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1318) Which already fixed in current version 1.1.x-r5989. The version in ports tree is 1.1.7, I wish it could be updated while it affecting a new port's

FreeBSD Port: libfpx-1.2.0.12_1

2007-11-25 Thread Elena Zaytseva
Hi there! I am sorry to tell you, but i think this link doesnt work :( http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/fpx.mega-patch.2007-11-01.bz2 Regards, Eleni ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

libgphoto2-2.4.0 - PTPBUG_DELETE_SENDS_EVENT caused hang for Canon IXUS 55 and S3 IS

2007-11-25 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Recently I noticed that attempting to delete gphotos from my Canon IXUS 55 in gtkam would just hang. After some experimentation, combined with looking at older sources (which did not hang), I tracked the behaviour down to the PTPBUG_DELETE_SENDS_EVENT flags in libgphoto2. I purchased a Canon

Re: libgphoto2-2.4.0 - PTPBUG_DELETE_SENDS_EVENT caused hang for Canon IXUS 55 and S3 IS

2007-11-25 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Mark Kirkwood píše v po 26. 11. 2007 v 09:21 +1300: Recently I noticed that attempting to delete gphotos from my Canon IXUS 55 in gtkam would just hang. After some experimentation, combined with looking at older sources (which did not hang), I tracked the behaviour down to the

Re: ports modifying system setups

2007-11-25 Thread Chuck Robey
Gergely CZUCZY wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:43:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: Gergely CZUCZY wrote: echo 'sevice_enable=YES' /etc/rc.conf.local Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-25 Thread Doug Barton
RW wrote: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800 Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you could start

[HEADSUP] new package status/statistics uploaded to portsmon.freebsd.org

2007-11-25 Thread Mark Linimon
I've been generating these locally but not uploading them. Now, they are up-to-date. If you are interested in what the state of the packages is on the various architectures, these pages will be of interest. Of particular interest to ports committers is the new page

Re: X Can't see my docked monitor - xorg or nvidia?

2007-11-25 Thread Kelly Hays
Doug, Did you ever get this working? I have a simular problem and the workaround I found is to use the nvidia-driver-96xx port instead of the regular nvidia-driver port. I can not remember the exact model of the Dell FP display that I have ( it is at work) but it is the same resolution

Re: X Can't see my docked monitor - xorg or nvidia?

2007-11-25 Thread Doug Barton
Kelly Hays wrote: Doug, Did you ever get this working? I have a simular problem and the workaround I found is to use the nvidia-driver-96xx port instead of the regular nvidia-driver port. I can not remember the exact model of the Dell FP display that I have ( it is at work) but it is the same

Re: Package Building in the Large

2007-11-25 Thread Chuck Robey
Doug Barton wrote: Jason C. Wells wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-25 Thread Doug Barton
Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: Doug Barton wrote: In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more useful. How hard would it be to include the

Re: Package Building in the Large

2007-11-25 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Chuck Robey wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Jason C. Wells wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on

Re: Package Building in the Large

2007-11-25 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a variety of difficulties with

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-25 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:26:09PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: Doug Barton wrote: In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-25 Thread Doug Barton
Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:26:09PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: Doug Barton wrote: In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed up version of the ports tree, I had

Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

2007-11-25 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? - -- Aryeh M. Friedman Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Re: Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

2007-11-25 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:19:59AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? If your ISP filters outbound TCP port 25, then it means they're probably doing so to stop/curb spam or

RE: Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

2007-11-25 Thread Chris Haulmark
Hi Aryeh! Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? If you have a web browser, you can submit it via FreeBSD's website: http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html The link is Submit a Problem Report. Chris

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-25 Thread Alex Dupre
Edwin Groothuis wrote: That would save me 42Mb to download each time :-P Oh wait. The cvsup checkouts file is probably a small (set of) file(s) with some revision information, while the portsnap file is a huge chunk of data with a copy of the ports tree. Well, even better: instead of the

RE: Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

2007-11-25 Thread Remko Lodder
On Mon, November 26, 2007 7:01 am, Chris Haulmark wrote: Hi Aryeh! Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? If you have a web browser, you can submit it via FreeBSD's website: