On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:04:12PM -0800, Todd Martin wrote:
I am fixed for now running 3.0.27a. when might this revision be part of
the ports tree ?
Probably sometime after the ports freeze is over (another 1-2 weeks)...
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at
On Friday 30 November 2007 21:47:07 Jason C. Wells wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:04:14PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
It wouldn't surprise me if portmanager is hoping that KDE 4.0 will go
prime time real
David Southwell píše v so 01. 12. 2007 v 03:08 -0800:
What criteria are used to determine whether an update is allowed or barred
during the freeze?
1) Security update
2) Build fix on one of the release platforms
3) Major runtime fix
--
Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On Saturday 01 December 2007 Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] answered part of
the question:
On Friday 30 November 2007 21:47:07 Jason C. Wells wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:04:14PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Jason C. Wells
I'm new to porting for FreeBSD and make files aren't my strongest suit.
So
I would be greatful if I could get an experienced porter to review my
make
files, for at very simple deamon.
I've read the porter handbook and the port seems to be working fine. But
I'm uncertain as to what is best
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:08:43AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
I must say I am having difficulty understanding the policies applicable
during ports freeze.
I had hoped that http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/qa.html and
http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/implementation.html would have been clear
David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] answered part
of
the question:
On Friday 30 November 2007 21:47:07 Jason C. Wells wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:04:14PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 07:50:02AM
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 05:14:55AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] answered part
of
the question:
On Friday 30 November 2007 21:47:07 Jason C. Wells wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:04:14PM -0600, Mark
On Sat 1 dec 07 at 14:25:08 +0100, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The ports freeze is intended to make sure the ports tree is in a stable and
well tested state for the release. Updating major ports always carry a
great risk of breaking things thus defeating the point of the freeze.
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
For some reason, people contributing to this mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The balance needs shifting and a method that does not demand a
freeze is now IMHO essential.
I might be wrong in this but much of the freeze seems to be due to
incomplete information being maintained on the interaction of
different ports for
Thank You
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 17:41:40 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make search= On
Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:53:52PM +, avi rot wrote: Hifreebsd
6.2 i try to find amule port with the command make search
On Saturday 01 December 2007 09:06:12 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Stephen
Hello:
I am looking for PHP ClamAV Lib
in ports and I do not know of hand
where to find it. I did not find it in
/usr/ports/security. And if it exists in
ports, what would it be called for a
find command?
My aim is to use it for scanning files
uploaded to web sites in php scripts.
I installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
jekillen wrote:
Hello:
I am looking for PHP ClamAV Lib
in ports and I do not know of hand
where to find it. I did not find it in
/usr/ports/security. And if it exists in
ports, what would it be called for a
find command?
My aim is to use it
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:37:45AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
But the chances are that freebsd-7 would be better becasue the extra 2 months
would give more feedback and urgent if not almost immediate needs for 7.1
might be delayed.
We've already _given_ 7.0 an extra 2 months; fortunately,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 11:56:42AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
These are all reasonably good suggestions for how to get around the ports
freeze. But they will come with a price, namely someone has to implement
these changes (which I guess one of you would do)
fwiw, one of the
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:48:34AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 08:48:41 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 07:49:00AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 05:58:21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:51:58AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
Before I do so let me step outsiide the freebsd environment and
ask what our comments would be if MS$ were to announce that they
were about to release an upgrade
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly inconvienced
by any of the ports tree freezes.
All I can say is bully for you! The question is how do we get rid of a
p[roblem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly
inconvienced by any of the ports tree freezes.
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 11:49:11AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly inconvienced
by any of the ports tree freezes.
All I can say is bully for you! The question is how do
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:51:58AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
Before I do so let me step outsiide the freebsd environment and ask what our
comments would be if MS$ were to announce that they were about to release an
upgrade to their operating system and until the new upgrade had been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 11:49:11AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly
inconvienced by any of the ports tree
On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 11:49:11AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:33:30AM -0800, David Southwell wrote:
current. The idea I proposed is that ports have release dependencies and as
new releases are being prepared maintainers change the dependencies when the
port has been tested and ready for the new release. In other words the
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
My main issue is the lack of good depenancy tracking
Dependency tracking is a manual operation of the port maintainer.
There is no way to automatize it, because there is a lot more in
dependencies than shared libraries (which could be tracked
automatically). As such it
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:38:05AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
It's not clear to me how this differs from having a branched ports
tree. Say X.org 7.4 is released tomorrow with a new set of libraries.
You just won [EMAIL PROTECTED] Haven't they mentioned branching yet? award.
The race for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Talon wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
My main issue is the lack of good depenancy tracking
Dependency tracking is a manual operation of the port maintainer.
There is no way to automatize it, because there is a lot more in
dependencies
I am trying to rebuild nvidia-driver using portupgrade to match a newer
kernel and in the Makefile is the statement:
# Building with -Werror requires prototype for suser()
${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '15s,^,#include sys/priv.h,' \
${WRKSRC}/src/nvidia_os.c
The error I get
--- Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Saturday 01 December 2007 11:08:28 kirjutas Yuri Pankov:
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Saturday 01 December 2007 05:20:40 kirjutas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just been helping
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:10:14PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
This is due to thinking of the port system as one would of as say
make(1) namely a multistage transaction vs. one big atomic
transaction. Doing first makes each port responible for most it's
knowledge and thus open to
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:28:59 -0600, Tim Clewlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Saturday 01 December 2007 11:08:28 kirjutas Yuri Pankov:
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Saturday 01 December 2007
On Saturday 01 December 2007 11:54:40 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly
inconvienced by any of the ports tree freezes.
All I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 11:54:40 Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 11:54:40 Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 11:54:40 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 10:28:40 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally, as a user, I have never really been even slightly
inconvienced
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:10:14PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
This is due to thinking of the port system as one would of as say
make(1) namely a multistage transaction vs. one big atomic
transaction. Doing first makes
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007 11:54:40 Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Saturday 01 December 2007
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:16:31PM -0500, Frank wrote:
I am trying to rebuild nvidia-driver using portupgrade to match a newer
kernel and in the Makefile is the statement:
# Building with -Werror requires prototype for suser()
${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '15s,^,#include sys/priv.h,' \
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:54:28AM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
I looked in the Makefile for mplayer but couldn't find any MAINTAINER.
$ cd multimedia/mplayer
$ make maintainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like it's maintained to me ...
mcl
___
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 03:54:28 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Davour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked in the Makefile for mplayer but couldn't find any
MAINTAINER. I have a problem that the build configure seems to
detect the wrong directory for my win32 codecs. It suggests
42 matches
Mail list logo
