On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:26:45AM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:54:28AM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
I looked in the Makefile for mplayer but couldn't find any MAINTAINER.
$ cd multimedia/mplayer
$ make maintainer
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the future (estimates
if and when needed vary from ASAP to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I promised not to venture my opinion on things but this one needs it
Too much talk from people not willing to do the heavy lifting.
There have been a number of serious attempts and in depth research
into various ports system issues (I still need
On Saturday 01 December 2007 15:05:39 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
It's nothing like global warming. Global warming is an ill understood
problem, with various estimates ranging from basically not existing to
it's too late and we are all doomed anyway, and the potential
consequences of not
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
3. What is the single best aspect of the current system?
Good people doing the heavy lifting
4. What is the single worst aspect of the current system?
Too much talk from people not willing to do the heavy lifting.
8. How long have you used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am not comparing a ports freeze to Global warming -- just
likening the responses to a problem.
And like global warming it is something everyone thinks they know
something about but at the end of day it turns out that as far I can
tell no one
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am not comparing a ports freeze to Global warming -- just
likening the responses to a problem.
And like global warming it is something everyone thinks they know
something about but at the end of day it turns out that
On Sunday 02 December 2007 06:41:12 Dan Langille wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
3. What is the single best aspect of the current system?
Good people doing the heavy lifting
4. What is the single worst aspect of the current system?
Too much talk from people not
On Sunday 02 December 2007 08:27:28 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I am not comparing a ports freeze to Global warming -- just
likening the responses to a problem.
And like global warming it is something everyone thinks they know
something about but at the end of day it turns out that as far I
On Dec 2, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Hi,
As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the future (estimates
if and when needed vary
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:37:22 -0600, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 02 December 2007 06:41:12 Dan Langille wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
3. What is the single best aspect of the current system?
Good people doing the heavy lifting
4. What is the
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Too much talk from people not willing to do the heavy lifting.
There have been a number of serious attempts and in depth research
into various ports system issues (I still need to wade through a
rather long one sent to me privately)... an other question did you
read
Any body?
I'm new to porting for FreeBSD and make files aren't my strongest suit.
So
I would be greatful if I could get an experienced porter to review my
make
files, for at very simple deamon.
I've read the porter handbook and the port seems to be working fine.
But
I'm uncertain as to what
GP wrote:
Hi and welcome!
First of all you should install ports-mgmt/portlint and run it against
your port (if you haven't done it already). Be sure to use the switch to
enable additional checks (I got bitten once because I forgot it).
Then you could perhaps put your work online somewhere
You should not make changes to /etc/rc.conf at all from a port. Please
remove that before submitting.
Thanks,
Doug
Thanks I will, but how should it be done? I must be there for it to work?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
David Southwell wrote:
Before I do so let me step outsiide the freebsd environment and ask what our
comments would be if MS$ were to announce that they were about to release an
upgrade to their operating system and until the new upgrade had been released
upgrades to existing applications
GP wrote:
You should not make changes to /etc/rc.conf at all from a port. Please
remove that before submitting.
Thanks,
Doug
Thanks I will, but how should it be done? I must be there for it to work?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Many ports need this to work, sadly it is often not mentioned at the
end of make install or the pkg_add. I would love for it to say
something like this. We need to make this easier to use when possible.
In order for the install of port name to work, it should be activated
via /etc.rc.conf,
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:37:57 -0600, GP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Ok. thanks.
Its simple so I will just put in in this mail.
I hope to have the ability to make changes in the source, so I've
included
the proposed application
Makefile as well.
Its all working, but I would like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Too much talk from people not willing to do the heavy lifting.
There have been a number of serious attempts and in depth
research into various ports system issues (I still need to wade
through a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miguel Mendez wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Hi,
As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is
at least a need to examine weither or not the current ports
system should remain as is or
3. What is the single best aspect of the current system?
Easy to write ports, or modify those created by others.
4. What is the single worst aspect of the current system?
Slowness of pkg_version and make index.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:37:22 -0600, David Southwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 02 December 2007 06:41:12 Dan Langille wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
3. What is the single best aspect of the
23 matches
Mail list logo
