On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:43:36AM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2007-12-13, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further, note that my initial commit tried to do this, and I asked the
author if it was acceptable. It was clear from his reply that it was
not -- especially considering the
On 2007-12-13, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even without the Xinerama code, I don't see how we could have met your
'no modifications' clause and still have ion-3 be able to run on FreeBSD.
In fact, I don't see how any packaging system can meet that standard.
Perhaps you can tell me
Anybody else seeing this ? Seems to be pretty serious if it's not my
local issue.
$ portupgrade graphviz
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 643: Malformed conditional
(${_USE_GNOME_ALL:Mpango}==)
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 6147: if-less endif
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:59:34PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2007-12-12, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's impossible for the FreeBSD ports system to guarantee compliance with
his arbitrarily chosen 28 days rule.
There is no 28 days rule. There is a latest release in 28 days or
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:48:07AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I believe Mark removed the source tarball from the master FreeBSD FTP
server, and very likely removed the binary packages as well.
Correct.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On 2007-12-13, Philip Paeps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not gone awol. I replied to your email about the port being out of
date the day after you sent it.
Closer to two days...
It is not particularly difficult to comply with the licence. It just takes
a bit of time (which I'm happy to
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2007-12-12, Danny Pansters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The guy was never trying to find any compromise.
What compromise can be had, when the distros never try to be
constructive?
Given that as your perspective (which you are of course entitled to),
and given that
On 2007-12-13, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this help you understand things a bit better?
I know how the system works. I've even tried using FreeBSD on a couple
of occasions -- and every time dependencies among the source packages
have been broken, etc.
--
Tuomo
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote:
Anyway. How does portmgr feel about this? Aye or nay?
I do not yet believe that it is possible to meet Tuomo's interpretation
of his license without his prior review of every possible patch, and I'm
not willing to obligate the
On 2007-12-13 10:54:47 (+), Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-12-13, Philip Paeps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not gone awol. I replied to your email about the port being out of
date the day after you sent it.
Closer to two days...
Yes.
It is not particularly
On 2007-12-13 05:02:36 (-0600), Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote:
Anyway. How does portmgr feel about this? Aye or nay?
I do not yet believe that it is possible to meet Tuomo's interpretation
of his license without his
On 2007-12-13, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not yet believe that it is possible to meet Tuomo's interpretation
of his license without his prior review of every possible patch,
If you don't trust your judgement on significant vs. insignificant
changes, you can just have the user
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:01:50AM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2007-12-13, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this help you understand things a bit better?
I know how the system works. I've even tried using FreeBSD on a couple
of occasions -- and every time dependencies among
on 13/12/2007 12:28 Rene Ladan said the following:
2007/12/13, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anybody else seeing this ? Seems to be pretty serious if it's not my
local issue.
$ portupgrade graphviz
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 643: Malformed conditional
(${_USE_GNOME_ALL:Mpango}==)
Sorry for top-posting. Just discovered that if I remove saved options
file then things seems to be better.
Here's what I had in the file:
_OPTIONS_READ=graphviz-2.12_2
WITH_TK=true
WITH_XPM=true
WITH_ICONV=true
WITH_NLS=true
WITH_PANGOCAIRO=true
WITH_PERL=true
WITHOUT_PHP=true
WITH_PYTHON=true
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:10PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Maybe, their pissed-off threshold is just greater, and they were able to get
through his fireworks without losing the sight of /their users/, who continue
to like the software, however frustrating the author's fits...
It's not an
2007/12/13, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[..]
Not sure what exactly and why confused the port. I wasn't even able to
run make config.
Here's diff between old and new options just in case:
--- /tmp/optionsMon May 21 11:12:22 2007
+++ /var/db/ports/graphviz/options Thu Dec 13
On Dec 13, 2007, at 02:32 , David Southwell wrote:
I suspect antagonistic responsesfrom some people are more about
wounded pride
(i.e - astonishment why should anyone propose to improve on the
procedures,
systems and engineering to which they contributed in the past!)
You suspect wrong.
Ade Lovett wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 02:32 , David Southwell wrote:
I suspect antagonistic responsesfrom some people are more about
wounded pride
(i.e - astonishment why should anyone propose to improve on the
procedures,
systems and engineering to which they contributed in the past!)
You
On четвер 13 грудень 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
= So far one person has stated that they tried and gave
= up. Maybe the next person will be more successful.
Absolutely right. My point, however, was that the rashed removal makes that
hypothetical next person's job more difficult.
No, not
Hi,
I've been trying to find a solution to my problem via Google or
freebsd-ports' group archive but maybe you can help.
The problem is: I run cvsup, go into /usr/ports and type make index. After
some minutes I get the following error message:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 643: Malformed
In response to Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2007-12-13, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:30:06AM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
The copyright holder reserves the right to refine the definition of
significant changes on a per-case basis.
In other
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:09:31 +0100
Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Applying this diff make things work again on my box :)
I had a problem with this last night, but I just resynced, and all my
ports upgraded correctly, so I guess it's fixed now.
On 2007-12-13, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you not understand the part where Mark described the requirement to
avoid possible legal trouble?
Which part of my reply did you not understand?
And at least where I come from, contracts are legally enforceable,
even if they're only
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:23:24AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
No, not impossible -- getting stuff out from the Attic is doable. But more
difficult (possibly involving contacting repo-meisters, etc.)
Wrong. You do cvs add, cvs com.
Any claims of license violations -- which, according to
In response to Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On четвер 13 грудень 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
= So far one person has stated that they tried and gave
= up. Maybe the next person will be more successful.
Absolutely right. My point, however, was that the rashed removal makes that
Dear
I try to send a bug report to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for tclhttpd-3.5.1_2
but ÉI got this error
VotreFreeBSD Port: tclhttpd-3.5.1_2
document :
On четвер 13 грудень 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
= Wrong. You do cvs add, cvs com.
That would lose the prior history of the port, AFAIK.
= At least in the US, a court of law won't accept we'll be deleting the
= infringing software Pretty Soon. Once notified of the infringement, you
= are obliged
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:43:07PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
And at least where I come from, contracts are legally enforceable,
even if they're only oral ones
You clearly don't come from the US, where oral contracts are not
germane in business law. What's written down in the license is the
2007/12/13, Bernard Nowakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've been trying to find a solution to my problem via Google or
freebsd-ports' group archive but maybe you can help.
The problem is: I run cvsup, go into /usr/ports and type make index. After
some minutes I get the following error
Hi,
I've been trying to use multimedia/miro but I am having a problem. I
cannot access the Miro Guide. On startup, miro delivers the message
Loading Miro Guide and it stays there indefinitely. I've left my
laptop unattended for a couple of hours but nothing changed.
miro seems to be
Greetings-
I am the maintainer of the mysqltoolkit port. Recently, the project
underwent a name change and is now maatkit.
The application has also undergone some updates so I would like to
update the port to the latest version.
While I am sure I am not the first person to ever have this
On 2007-12-13, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Xinerama can be among the
OPTIONS (default off) thus respecting the requirement, that modifications be
only on user's request.
It's ok that it's an ion-specific option that is clearly documented to add
an unsupported feature.
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but I
figured I would start a new thread.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can be done better. We *know* the scaling limits of
the current system, and most of us are completely amazed it even
still
Stephen Montgomery-Smith writes:
I understand that you might have a private definition of ports@
that it should only discuss the current system. But if this is
all you come to this group for, just press the delete key when it
is not something you are personally interested in.
I
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon):
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:43:07PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
And at least where I come from, contracts are legally enforceable,
even if they're only oral ones
You clearly don't come from the US, where oral contracts are not
germane in
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:31:01AM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
Greetings-
I am the maintainer of the mysqltoolkit port. Recently, the project
underwent a name change and is now maatkit.
The application has also undergone some updates so I would like to update
the port to the latest
jekillen wrote:
Hello;
Can I get some advice:
I have Postfix installed from package at system install.
I am trying to set up Cyrus Imap and Cyradm. These
have specified use of mysql for database types. After
carefully crafting the configuration files for Postfix, I
am informed tha Postfix does
on 13/12/2007 15:56 Dirk Meyer said the following:
Hallo Andriy Gapon,
Here's diff between old and new options just in case:
--- /tmp/optionsMon May 21 11:12:22 2007
+++ /var/db/ports/graphviz/options Thu Dec 13 14:27:03 2007
@@ -1,12 +1,18 @@
# This file is auto-generated by
--On Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:17:43 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear
I try to send a bug report to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for tclhttpd-3.5.1_2
but ÉI got this error
VotreFreeBSD Port: tclhttpd-3.5.1_2
document :
n'a pas été [EMAIL PROTECTED]
distribué à
:
Motif
--On Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:17:16 + Tuomo Valkonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-12-13, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:30:06AM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
The copyright holder reserves the right to refine the definition of
significant changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to use multimedia/miro but I am having a problem.
I cannot access the Miro Guide. On startup, miro delivers the
message Loading Miro Guide and it stays there indefinitely. I've
left my
On 2007-12-13, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a lawyer tell me exactly what you said: That verbal agreements
_are_ legally binding, but almost never enforceable.
That may be because typical verbal agreements are difficult to prove.
However, a statement on, say, a public mailing
On 2007-12-13, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The license is what is is, unless and until I say it's not. Therefore, you
can use it, for now, but you need to pay close attention because I might
change it at some point in the future and *then* you will be liable.
Well, I suppose that
Le Jeu 13 déc 07 à 11:34:25 +0100, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
écrivait :
Hi,
Hello,
I've been trying to use multimedia/miro but I am having a problem. I
cannot access the Miro Guide. On startup, miro delivers the message
Loading Miro Guide and it stays there
Well, not much it seems... except that the cvsps-devel port has not
been updated since 2005.
It looks like the cvsps-devel port is redundant.
Should I file a PR?
Here's a diff between the two:
diff -urN cvsps/CVS/Entries cvsps-devel/CVS/Entries
--- cvsps/CVS/Entries Fri Oct 12 13:39:25 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ade Lovett wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 02:32 , David Southwell wrote:
I suspect antagonistic responsesfrom some people are more about
wounded pride (i.e - astonishment why should anyone propose to
improve on the procedures, systems and engineering
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to use multimedia/miro but I am having a problem.
I cannot access the Miro Guide. On startup, miro delivers the
message Loading Miro Guide and it stays there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Huff wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith writes:
I understand that you might have a private definition of ports@
that it should only discuss the current system. But if this is
all you come to this group for, just press the delete key when it
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but I figured
I would start a new thread.
Rightly so.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can be done better. We *know* the scaling limits of the
current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but
I figured I would start a new thread.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can be done better. We *know* the scaling limits of
On Dec 13, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ade Lovett wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 02:32 , David Southwell wrote:
I suspect antagonistic responsesfrom some people are more about
wounded pride (i.e - astonishment why should anyone
On Dec 13, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey
but I figured I would start a new thread.
Rightly so.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can be done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey
but I figured I would start a new thread.
Rightly so.
On Dec
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but I
figured I would start a new thread.
Rightly so.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:42:43AM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but I
figured I would start a new thread.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can be done better. We *know* the scaling limits of the
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but I
figured I would start a new thread.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
We *know* it can be done better. We *know* the scaling limits of the
current system, and most of us are completely
cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -O3 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer
-I./libavcodec -I./libavformat -Wdisabled-optimization -Wno-pointer-sign
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -I. -I. -I./libavutil -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4
-O3 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:00:54PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
That is why I plan to use xorg as the test case for the new system
namely if it builds xorg in the most efficent way possible then it
will be considered good enough for release
You need to pick a much more complicated set
I just wonder if you asked the general population, whether they'd rather
have ports or packages, I bet most would vote for packages, aside from
those that actually like watching the compilation output fly by.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Birrell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:00:54PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
That is why I plan to use xorg as the test case for the new system
namely if it builds xorg in the most efficent way possible then it
will be considered
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:36:07PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I was not planning to skimp on the requirements at all but the test
case is xorg... i.e. I will do my best to not compermise on
features/requirements but xorg meets several criteria for being a good
test (out of order building,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Birrell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:36:07PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I was not planning to skimp on the requirements at all but the
test case is xorg... i.e. I will do my best to not compermise on
features/requirements but xorg
Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Jeu 13 déc 07 à 11:34:25 +0100, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
écrivait :
Hi,
Hello,
I've been trying to use multimedia/miro but I am having a problem. I
cannot access the Miro Guide. On startup, miro delivers the message
Loading Miro Guide
On 12/13/07, Bernard Nowakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find a solution to my problem via Google or
freebsd-ports' group archive but maybe you can help.
The problem is: I run cvsup, go into /usr/ports and type make index. After
some minutes I get the following error
Excellent. Thank you!
Bradford Castalia Senior Systems Analyst
Planetary Image Research Laboratory University of Arizona
Build an image in your mind, fit yourself into it.
Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 16:21:10 -0700, Bradford
Hi all
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have any
answer.
I known that's nothing urgent, but without tex the live is hard ;-)
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
Observatoire
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have
any answer.
Me too.
I must add that I tried two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Danny Pansters wrote:
On Thursday 13 December 2007 19:17:34 Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This thread was called results of ports re-engineering survey but I
figured I would start a new thread.
Rightly so.
On
Sergie,
I really appreciate your efforts with cfengine. I've discovered its use in
maintaining 8 different sites with fairly complex configuration
requirements. Is there any chance that you could update the kit to 2.2.3,
as there won't be another upgrade to cfengine until June 2008, and the
Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
Sergie,
I really appreciate your efforts with cfengine. I've discovered its use in
maintaining 8 different sites with fairly complex configuration
requirements. Is there any chance that you could update the kit to 2.2.3,
as there won't be another upgrade to
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have
any answer.
Hi,
On 14/12/2007, Nikola Lečić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I
73 matches
Mail list logo
