Re: linux_base-f8 giving me guff

2008-04-28 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:16:53 +0300 Walter Venable wrote: > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 $ sudo make > ===> linux_base-f8-8_3 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8. > Ok -- I get it, linux kernel 2.4.2 isn't supporte

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2008-04-28 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2008-04-28 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2008-04-28 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2008-04-28 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2008-04-28 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2008-04-28 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

Re: Practices for naming packages compiled from ports.

2008-04-28 Thread Alexey Rubtsov
В Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:26:40 -0700 "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> пишет: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Alexey Rubtsov > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to compile package from port sysutils/pecl-fileinfo and > > was some > > > > > > > > I didn't understand th

Re: Practices for naming packages compiled from ports.

2008-04-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Alexey Rubtsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile package from port sysutils/pecl-fileinfo and was > some > > > > I didn't understand this practice. Why i can't to compile the same > package with several names by included dependencies into

Re: linux_base-f8 giving me guff

2008-04-28 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:37:18PM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Walter Venable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 $ sudo make > > ===> linux_base-f8-8_3 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop

Practices for naming packages compiled from ports.

2008-04-28 Thread Alexey Rubtsov
Hi, I'm trying to compile package from port sysutils/pecl-fileinfo and was some I didn't understand this practice. Why i can't to compile the same package with several names by included dependencies into package. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123063 -- Alexey Rubtsov E-mail:

Fw: Practices for naming packages compiled from ports.

2008-04-28 Thread Alexey Rubtsov
Hi, Sorry to previous spam. I'm trying to compile package from port systitis/pecl-fileinfo and was some saddened. This package consists depend to php, but name of compiled package was pecl-fileinfo for either php version. In answer to my bug to this problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-

Re: How often do pointyhat do a build?

2008-04-28 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > So does it imply that pointyhat's -CURRENT would (slightly) behind the > current development? Yes, it takes some amount of time to upgrade everything. > Is there any way to know which __FreeBSDversion the current build is > running against

Re: How often do pointyhat do a build?

2008-04-28 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Linimon wrote: | On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:42:56PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: |> To make it short - how often pointyhat would do a full build? | | A full (from scratch, with latest src changes) build is not done very often. | We guarantee we do it bef

Re: long descriptions in OPTIONS

2008-04-28 Thread Wesley Shields
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:11:06AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 4/25/08, Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Based upon an idea in an earlier thread on this list[1] I came up with > > two ways of adding an extended description to our existing OPTIONS > > framework. > > > > 1: Extend

Re: How often do pointyhat do a build?

2008-04-28 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:42:56PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > To make it short - how often pointyhat would do a full build? A full (from scratch, with latest src changes) build is not done very often. We guarantee we do it before release time; there are other times, as well, (at least on i386/amd64).

Re: linux_base-f8 giving me guff

2008-04-28 Thread Anish Mistry
On Monday 28 April 2008, Walter Venable wrote: > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 $ sudo make > ===> linux_base-f8-8_3 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not > supported. *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8. > > Ok -- I get it, linux kernel 2.4.2 isn't supported. How d

Re: Trouble building guile 1.8.4 (segfault in gen-scmconfig)

2008-04-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:31:13 -0500, Jason Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eric Schuele wrote: I'm having little luck building guile 1.8.4 on 7.0-STABLE. Been failing for some time. I've sat quietly for a bit thinking someone might mention/fix it but I've seen no activity. So I thought I'd m

Re: linux_base-f8 giving me guff

2008-04-28 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Walter Venable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 $ sudo make > ===> linux_base-f8-8_3 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8. > > Ok -- I get it, linux kernel 2

linux_base-f8 giving me guff

2008-04-28 Thread Walter Venable
/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 $ sudo make ===> linux_base-f8-8_3 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8. Ok -- I get it, linux kernel 2.4.2 isn't supported. How do I get around this issue? I'm running 6.3-RELEASE-p2...

Re: Trouble building guile 1.8.4 (segfault in gen-scmconfig)

2008-04-28 Thread Jason Evans
Eric Schuele wrote: I'm having little luck building guile 1.8.4 on 7.0-STABLE. Been failing for some time. I've sat quietly for a bit thinking someone might mention/fix it but I've seen no activity. So I thought I'd mention it. > #96 0x28089658 in _pthread_mutex_destroy () from /usr/local/li

How often do pointyhat do a build?

2008-04-28 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, To make it short - how often pointyhat would do a full build? Say, how long should I consider a change (API addition) made on -HEAD be "safe" (does not cause compiling problems) for MFC into -STABLE branches? Cheers, - -- Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECT

net/skype, linux_base-fc6 and the missing linux-alsa-lib...

2008-04-28 Thread Willy Picard
Hi, I have the following problem while compiling net/skype on a FreeBSD 7.0 i386 machine. I am using linux_base-fc6 (I following the 20080318 entry in the /usr/ports/UPDATING file). However, while compiling net/skype, it appears that the audio/linux-alsa-lib port is missing (as a RUN_DEPENDS). Bu

boost-python-1.34.1 is already installed

2008-04-28 Thread Hans Lambermont
Why does an install attempt of astro/stellarium want to reinstall devel/boost ? portmaster -bd astro/stellarium ... ===>>> Starting build for astro/stellarium <<<=== ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency list for astro/stellarium from ports ===>>> Starting depen

Re: Rubygems and trouble with rdoc node renumbering

2008-04-28 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:19:17 +0200 Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > Heh, well, that's exactly what I thought about, 5 minutes after sending > that email! Yes, I'm running /usr and the WRKDIRPREFIX on ZFS. > > I haven't compared, if it is responsible for shuffling around the order

Re: Building new port, don't want to run as root

2008-04-28 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:27:44PM +0300, Walter Venable wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> I take it you're talking about a daemon process and you want to have the >> rc.subr scripts start it as another user than root? That's fairly simple. >> >> To make rc.subr start a process using a different

Re: Building new port, don't want to run as root

2008-04-28 Thread Walter Venable
Matthew Seaman wrote: I take it you're talking about a daemon process and you want to have the rc.subr scripts start it as another user than root? That's fairly simple. To make rc.subr start a process using a different UserID, all you need to do is define variables name = foo

php5-mysqli

2008-04-28 Thread Peter Czanik
Hello, When trying to compile php5-mysqli on FreeBSD 7.0 (both on i386 and amd64) I get [...] cc -I. -I/usr/tmp/usr/ports/databases/php5-mysqli/work/php-5.2.5/ext/mysqli -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/tmp /usr/ports/databases/php5-mysqli/work/php-5.2.5/ext/mysqli/include -I/usr/tmp/usr/ports/databases

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2008-04-28 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has bee

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2008-04-28 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the li

Re: lzma: invalid option -- s

2008-04-28 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:33:35PM +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote: > This might be interesting to multiple ports: > > 7.0-R, fresh portsnap. > > # portmaster -bad > ... > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for graphics/ImageMagick from ports > ===>>> Starting dependency check > > ===>>> The dependen