Makefile/man page problem

Hello, I am having a problem with installing/deinstalling man pages of a port I am working on, atf if interested. They are not being compressed on install and when I denistall the port I get error messages as follows: pkg_delete: file '/var/tmp/atf/man/man3/atf-c++/atf-c++-api.3.gz' doesn't

Re: Makefile/man page problem

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Marc Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am having a problem with installing/deinstalling man pages of a port I am working on, atf if interested. They are not being compressed on install and when I denistall the port I get error messages as follows:

FreeBSD Port: snort-2.8.1_1

Could you look at this thread regarding the MySQL database output of Snort 2.8.X. It has a one-line patch in spo_database.c to reconnect to the automatically. I must manually make this change each time Snort is updated from ports. http://www.snort.org/archive-4-4983.html Thanks in advance.

Current unassigned ports problem reports

Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including\nexperimental development code and obsolete releases.\n Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has

Re: Gnash 0.8.2

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos [...] I noticed that video rendering lags behind audio with 0.8.2 and devel. It seems that video rendering with AGG is not fast enough, so I will try to

problem building mldonkey

[I've written the maintainer twice, with no response.] While upgrading 2.9.4 to 2.9.5, I get this: Compiling CryptoPP.cc can take several minutes, on slow machines up to half an hour. ===Building for mldonkey-2.9.5 /usr/local/bin/ocamlc.opt -linkall -o ocamlpp.byte \

wine rebuilds font smth every time

Every time I run wine it starts rebuilding something related to fonts. This takes quite long, only after that a windows program is actually executed. Very annoying. This is wine-0.9.59,1, installed from a package, no extra configuration. What could be causing this? Any way to fix/workaround?

Re: [Bulk] Re: FreeBSD Port: policykit-gnome-0.8

Worked like a charm sir. Thank you, Brodey Dover ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wine rebuilds font smth every time

On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:27:25 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: Every time I run wine it starts rebuilding something related to fonts. This takes quite long, only after that a windows program is actually executed. Very annoying. This is wine-0.9.59,1, installed from a package, no extra configuration.

Re: problem building mldonkey

On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:05:43 -0400 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [I've written the maintainer twice, with no response.] While upgrading 2.9.4 to 2.9.5, I get this: Since I upgraded mlnet crashes everytime it's started. ___

ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

Hi, If this problem is already fixed, please ignore this email. Out ports infrastructure provides a set of variables to control the installation of various types of documentation: NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES, NOPORTDOCS, NOPORTEXAMPLES, NOPORTDATA. A description for each of them can be found in

help making new port: config err amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0 not supported

I'm trying to build the devel/arm-elf-gcc295 port for the more modern gcc4.2.3. What I've done: edited devel/arm-elf-gcc295/Makefile to change version 2.95 to 4.2.3, removed patches for v295, ran make makesum, ran make. This error seems like something pretty obvious, not having done it before,

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:50:10 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, snip The build logs can be found at: http://t64.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildportsbuild=7-STABLE-FTP If you commit a fix please let me know; if you submit a PR to fix your port please CC me on it

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:17:28 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:50:10 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, snip The build logs can be found at: http://t64.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildportsbuild=7-STABLE-FTP If you

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:31:59 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:17:28 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:50:10 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, snip The build logs can be found at:

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:49:42 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:31:59 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:17:28 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:50:10 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu

NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES (Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined)

On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:50:10 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will continue with the other categories, then I'll start testing for NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES. Speaking of which, is this to be set by user or port? Comments in b.p.m aren't very clear. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;)

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:07:59 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:49:42 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:31:59 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:17:28 -0500 Jeremy Messenger

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:45:32 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, what's GNOME Team's infrastructure now? If tarball has reference[1] then we sometime use reference framework (USE_GNOME=referencehack in master port and include

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:46:17 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:45:32 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, what's GNOME Team's infrastructure now? If tarball has reference[1] then we sometime use reference framework

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:18:25 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And how are updates tested - except when you hijack pointyhat :) ? I think, most of us don't test it until pointyhat complain it. ;-) It's :-D very rare for *-reference ports to change with PORTDOCS=* unless

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:23:00 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:18:25 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And how are updates tested - except when you hijack pointyhat :) ? I think, most of us don't test it until pointyhat complain it. ;-)

Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined

On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:11:05 -0700 Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:11:05 -0700 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent:

Re: help making new port: config err amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0 not supported

On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:37:32 -0700 Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: I'm trying to build the devel/arm-elf-gcc295 port for the more modern gcc4.2.3. What I've done: edited devel/arm-elf-gcc295/Makefile to change version 2.95 to 4.2.3, removed patches for v295, ran make makesum, ran