[patch] ghostscript-gpl: don't link against libiconv

2008-06-01 Thread Helge Oldach
Submitter-Id: current-users Originator:Helge Oldach Organization: Confidential: no Synopsis: [patch] ghostscript-gpl: don't link against libiconv Severity: non-critical Priority: low Category: ports Class: sw-bug Release: FreeBSD 6.3-1230 i386

Re: [patch] ghostscript-gpl: don't link against libiconv

2008-06-01 Thread Parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Helge Oldach thusly... Description: print/ghostscript-gpl will link against an installed libiconv, even if the OPVP/OPRP drivers are not enabled. However, only those two drivers require libiconv; this library is otherwise unused. Avoid this linkage

INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x

2008-06-01 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: INDEX build failed for 8.x

2008-06-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/chinese/links/../../www/links/Makefile, line 75: warning: duplicate script for target pre-configure ignored pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found

About closed-source ports...

2008-06-01 Thread ck74
Hello! Couls someone please tell me how a user can restrict freebsd to install open-source ports only? Well, for example if you want to install www/opera, 'make install' does not warn user that this port uses closed-source (binary distribution) only. Regards, -- View this message in context:

Re: About closed-source ports...

2008-06-01 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 02:23:15AM -0700, ck74 wrote: Hello! Couls someone please tell me how a user can restrict freebsd to install open-source ports only? Well, for example if you want to install www/opera, 'make install' does not warn user that this port uses closed-source (binary

About closed-source ports...

2008-06-01 Thread ck74
Hello! Couls someone please tell me how a user can restrict freebsd to install open-source ports only? Well, for example if you want to install www/opera, 'make install' does not warn user that this port uses closed-source (binary distribution) only. Regards, -- View this message in context:

Wine 1.0-rc3 failed build

2008-06-01 Thread Naram Qashat
I just updated my ports tree which included the update of Wine to 1.0-rc3. I attempted to build it and it failed at this point: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-1.0-rc3/dlls/wininet' cc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_WINX32_

HEADS UP: Ports support for 5.X is no more

2008-06-01 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
As of June 1, 2008 00:00:00 UTC, FreeBSD 5.X support in the ports tree is End Of Life. This means that a ports tree checked out after this date is not guaranteed to produce usable packages on 5.X. Additionally, 5.X package builds on the cluster will cease. Users are encouraged to upgrade to 6.3

Perl Modules - Sys::CPU Sys::MemInfo

2008-06-01 Thread Terry Sposato
Hi Guys, Just wondering whether anyone has though of porting the following perl modules: Sys::CPU Sys::MemInfo Is there a lot of work involved in porting these types of modules to ports? I have created a couple of ports, but these were very basic indeed and I believe this would be out of

port maintaince procedural questions

2008-06-01 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have brought a older port maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the current version I have done all the work needed to make it committable I have several questions first: 1. How do I take maintainership of the port? 2. How do I submit the

Re: port maintaince procedural questions

2008-06-01 Thread Matthew Donovan
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 08:49:15PM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have brought a older port maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the current version I have done all the work needed to make it committable I have several questions

GNOME Online Desktop available in PR.

2008-06-01 Thread Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल
Hi, I've fixed the issues, I'm having the GNOME Online Desktop ports. So I've submitted them as the PRs: 124196, 124198. Due to my mistake, PR No. is 124198 is submitted in wrong category ('misc') instead of correct ('ports'). So, if anyone has write access to the GNATS, please correct this.

new port devel/atf and libtool fun, umm help

2008-06-01 Thread Marc Spitzer
Hello, I am trying to port atf, a unit testing framework to freebsd and I had everything working except for a warning about aclocal being needed because I patched configure.ac to move the *.pc files from lib/pkgconfig to libdata/pkgconfig per port check /usr/ports/devel/atf now it dies in