Current unassigned ports problem reports

(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

petsc-mpich compilation error

Hi, I have a problem with petsc-mpich port: ... === petsc-mpich-2.3.3.p0_1,1 depends on shared library: netcdf.4 - found === Configuring for petsc-mpich-2.3.3.p0_1,1 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e s|AMD/Include|include/AMD| -e s| AMD/Lib|/usr/local/lib|

RE: pkg_trans progress

I have tried building this and it fails at two places one is the libinstall.a compiling which make buildworld creates. and the other part is at main.o but when I build this outside the source tree it does seem to compile and install just fine. ___

What if a port doesn't have a version

I am writing a port for cinelerra and to grab the source you must get it from the git repo that they have. so the software doesn't have a version so to speak. Should I use the version from the installed version after I install cinelerra for the portversion and just tar it up?

Re: What if a port doesn't have a version

for the portversion and just tar it up? Create your own tarball and give it a version which is a date- timestamp like 20081027... Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports

INDEX build failed for 6.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: ja-jvim-wnn7-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for /usr/ports/japanese/onew-wnn7 make_index: ja-jvim-canna+wnn6-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for

Re: What if a port doesn't have a version

On Oct 27, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: | Should I use the version from the installed version after I install | cinelerra for the portversion and just tar it up? | | Create your own tarball and give it a version which is a date- timestamp | like 20081027... Or use the revision

Re: What if a port doesn't have a version

it a version which is a date-timestamp | | like 20081027... | | Or use the revision control's revision number. | | That works well with things like Subversion which ensure that the | revision number is monotonically increasing. My understanding of git | is that it favors decentralized workareas

Re: Call for comments - pkg_trans

Miroslav Lachman wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Norberto Meijome wrote: [...] And since we are just wishing for things, It'd be nice to have an opportunity to back off from a install/remove after calculating dependencies, such as that provided by yum (it shows everything it will do and asks for

ADS STudio

Hello, I only have a license for adstudio 6.5 - 7.0 - is there a port for that version? I can't seem to find it. Thanks for you help, Melissa ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: What if a port doesn't have a version

. | | Should I use the version from the installed version after I install | cinelerra for the portversion and just tar it up? | | Create your own tarball and give it a version which is a date-timestamp | like 20081027... Or use the revision control's revision number. | | Regards, - -- Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL

Re: ADS STudio

Hi-- On Oct 27, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Melissa A. VandenBrink wrote: I only have a license for adstudio 6.5 - 7.0 - is there a port for that version? I can't seem to find it. The port should be located at /usr/ports/databases/adstudio, and claims to be v7.0.4. Presumably your 7.0 license

Re: What if a port doesn't have a version

for the portversion and just tar it up? | | | | Create your own tarball and give it a version which is a date-timestamp | | like 20081027... | | Or use the revision control's revision number. | | That works well with things like Subversion which ensure that the | revision number is monotonically

Re: ADS STudio

Le Lun 27 oct 08 à 20:04:18 +0100, Melissa A. VandenBrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : Hello, Hello, I only have a license for adstudio 6.5 - 7.0 - is there a port for that version? I can't seem to find it. The port databases/adstudio is currently at version 7.0.4, and your license should

INDEX build failed for 6.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: ja-jvim-wnn7-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for /usr/ports/japanese/onew-wnn7 make_index: ja-jvim-canna+wnn6-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for

Re: ADS STudio

Hello Thierry, I have spoken with Aqua Data Studio - my license expired @ the end of September making it not valid for any upgrade that came out after that date. I have a copy of the ads linux version that I use on my desktop at work - that I was able to port to my Free BSD latptop. Thank

INDEX build failed for 6.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: ja-jvim-wnn7-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for /usr/ports/japanese/onew-wnn7 make_index: ja-jvim-canna+wnn6-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for

INDEX build failed for 6.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: ja-jvim-wnn7-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for /usr/ports/japanese/onew-wnn7 make_index: ja-jvim-canna+wnn6-3.0.j2.1a_3: no entry for

OOo-3 and OOo-3-RC [?]

Maybe somebody in ports can help me understand the relationship between the openoffice.org-3 and the openoffice.org-3-RC. I ask because last time I got stuck with OOo-2-RC (that I see is still in editors/. portupgrade says the latter cannot be upgraded.