2008/11/17 Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rene Ladan schreef:
Hi,
I have a patch[1] ready for the astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced port to
update it to 6.03 (which is the same as 5.27 but with the science and
graphics code separated), and to add astropulse 4.28 (same as 4.35, but
the version
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:59:47AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
When you update your ports via csup (not sure about portsnap), the INDEX
file **is not** updated.
portsnap does update the index.
--
Guido Falsi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hi!
QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64.
here is the report:
http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log
I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it looks
like and AMD64 problem.
Could someone with some amd64 hardware help me a little?
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
${INSTALL_DATA}
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist
does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:04 +0100
Guido Falsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64.
here is the report:
http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log
I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it
looks
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ .. ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
Hi,
BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least):
From: [EMAIL
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ .. ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ ..
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
The
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:35:45 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want
me
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
The
Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary
Hi,
does anyone port Jdownloader (java app) to freebsd yet??
thanks!!
TFC
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:44:17 +0100
Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota escribió:
Hello, forks.
There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following.
% ls -d */*tomcat*
java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41
www/jakarta-tomcat4
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:13:24 -0500
Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
does anyone port Jdownloader (java app) to freebsd yet??
Is there some specific problem with Jdownloader, which should
be platform independent, or are asking about a FreeBSD port (as
in /usr/ports)?
21 matches
Mail list logo
