Alexander Churanov ha scritto:
... To my mind suggested approach would simplify understanding of how
to install boost. The user would ask a question like 'should I add python to
my boost installation' instead of 'is my boost built with python support or
not'.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Andrea,
OK, after finishing with currently mutually exclusive Boost without Python
and Boost with Python ports I will try to create Base libraries from
Boost port and complementary Boost.Python bridge ports.
Alexander Churanov
2008/11/24 Andrea Venturoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Churanov
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license
acceptance.
If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one.
One use, for
Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license
acceptance.
You will probably find this is for legal reasons.
If
on 20/10/2008 17:14 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I try to install archivers/rar on amd64 system without 32-bit userland
(NO_LIB32) but with 32-bit support in kernel (COMPAT_IA32) and I get the
following error:
** Port marked as IGNORE: archivers/rar:
requires 32-bit libraries
Andriy Gapon escribió:
on 20/10/2008 17:14 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I try to install archivers/rar on amd64 system without 32-bit userland
(NO_LIB32) but with 32-bit support in kernel (COMPAT_IA32) and I get the
following error:
** Port marked as IGNORE: archivers/rar:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:55:55 +0200
Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license
acceptance.
Hi,
Cy Schubert wrote:
Can Openoffice.org 2.4 and 3.0 coexist on the same system?
I have compiled installed both on amd64. The binaries do not
conflict (see below), Both start OK announcing right version numbers.
But I'm not a serious user no idea if all libs other includes
etc are carefully
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 01:55:55PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license
acceptance.
If we
Andrew D wrote:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license
acceptance.
You will probably find this
on 24/11/2008 15:49 Erik Trulsson said the following:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 01:55:55PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example is java/jdk* ports
At least jdk15 and jdk16 ports should be marked with IS_INTERACTIVE
because they always ask user about license acceptance.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:47:13PM +, RW wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:55:55 +0200
Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
options. One example
I am using subversion-freebsd port as a replacement for normal subversion.
Recently I tried to install kdesdk port and was quite surprised to see
that it wants to pull in devel/subversion.
It turns out that kdesdk checks for svn_client-1.0 in its LIB_DEPENDS,
but subversion-freebsd
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want.
FUD, IMO :-)
Where you live, you have the German legal system. Where I live, I
have the US legal system.
Remember, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they
I maintain a port for which the vendor provided me a customized
distfile. They don't have it available for download from their site, so
I need to find a home for it. Does the FreeBSD Project or Foundation
provide hosting space for such cases or do I need to find my own space?
2008/11/23 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Synopsis: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix
CVE-2008-4829
Can we not have these on the freebsd-secuirty list please? I
subscribe to freebsd-security to get security alerts, not to get
emails every time a port is changed.
William Palfreman
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:58:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I maintain a port for which the vendor provided me a customized distfile.
They don't have it available for download from their site, so I need to
find a home for it. Does the FreeBSD Project or Foundation provide hosting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:36:54 -0800
Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, importing spellcheck dictionaries into either version results
in bad tranfer url. Is there a solution to this?
This might serve as a temporary solution:
2008/11/24 Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/24/08 19:55, William Palfreman wrote:
2008/11/23 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Synopsis: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix
CVE-2008-4829
Can we not have these on the freebsd-secuirty list please? I
subscribe to freebsd-security to
On 11/24/08 19:55, William Palfreman wrote:
2008/11/23 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Synopsis: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix
CVE-2008-4829
Can we not have these on the freebsd-secuirty list please? I
subscribe to freebsd-security to get security alerts, not to get
emails
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, William Palfreman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
2008/11/24 Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/24/08 19:55, William Palfreman wrote:
2008/11/23 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Synopsis: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix
CVE-2008-4829
Can we not have
23 matches
Mail list logo
