Re: portupgrade and freebsd-update: A better way?

2008-12-11 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 12/11/08, Peter Beckman wrote: >> So I took on binary upgrading one of my FreeBSD servers today from >> 6.2-RELEASE to 7.0-RELEASE. Many useful sites outline exactly how to do >> this right, and they are mostly useful. >> >> Except whe

Re: portupgrade and freebsd-update: A better way?

2008-12-11 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 12/11/08, Peter Beckman wrote: > So I took on binary upgrading one of my FreeBSD servers today from > 6.2-RELEASE to 7.0-RELEASE. Many useful sites outline exactly how to do > this right, and they are mostly useful. > > Except when it comes to ports. > > > http://www.daemonology.net/blog/20

Re: portupgrade and freebsd-update: A better way?

2008-12-11 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > So I took on binary upgrading one of my FreeBSD servers today from > 6.2-RELEASE to 7.0-RELEASE. Many useful sites outline exactly how to do > this right, and they are mostly useful. > > Except when it comes to ports. > > > http://www.daemo

portupgrade and freebsd-update: A better way?

2008-12-11 Thread Peter Beckman
So I took on binary upgrading one of my FreeBSD servers today from 6.2-RELEASE to 7.0-RELEASE. Many useful sites outline exactly how to do this right, and they are mostly useful. Except when it comes to ports. http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-11-freebsd-major-version-upgrade.html

FreeBSD Port: apache-2.2.9_5

2008-12-11 Thread Joao Pedras
Greetings, I would like to report that apache-2.2.9 port doesn't include usr/local/etc/rc.d/* into a binary package. I am doing this in RELENG_7 using 'make package-recursive'. Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

2008-12-11 Thread N.J. Mann
In message <20081203131234.gd70...@hades.panopticon>, Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: > * G. Paul Ziemba (pz-freebsd-po...@ziemba.us) wrote: [...] > > > 2. I'm not sure we need the test for *.orig|*.rej|*~|*,v, but it > >wouldn't hurt. Maybe it helps admins who are actively

net/asterisk: b2bua.org down, patch fails

2008-12-11 Thread Peter Beckman
Tried to upgrade asterisk today: ===> Found saved configuration for asterisk-1.4.22 => asterisk-1.4.22-codec-negotiation-20081110.diff.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://b2bua.org/chrome/site/. fetch: http://b2bua.org/chrome/site/asterisk-1.4

net/asterisk: b2bua.org down, patch fails

2008-12-11 Thread Peter Beckman
Tried to upgrade asterisk today: ===> Found saved configuration for asterisk-1.4.22 => asterisk-1.4.22-codec-negotiation-20081110.diff.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://b2bua.org/chrome/site/. fetch: http://b2bua.org/chrome/site/asterisk-1.4.

FreeBSD Port: zaptel-1.4.11

2008-12-11 Thread Rodrigo Müller
Hello, I recently installed the new version of zaptel-bsd (1.4.11), and noticed that the module wcfxo no longer exists. Is there a way to set up a card X100P Clone with this version of zaptel? I'm using FreeBSD 7.0 Thank you very much, Rodrigo Müller ___

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

2008-12-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:23:25 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is what Debian and Gentoo does. Remember we don't have to pass DESTDIR variable to 'make -C /usr/ports/editors/emacs-cvs' instead it will be passed to th

latest asterisk and zaptel and app meeatme

2008-12-11 Thread Anatoli Marinov
Guys, I have the latest ports from yesterday - asterisk 1.4.22 and zaptel 1.4.11, FreeBSD 7.1 PRE My server uses app_meatme for our conferences. The there is an issue with latest software. When I tried to enter in the conference i got: -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Ringing("SIP/3004-2871

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

2008-12-11 Thread Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल
Dmitry Marakasov writes: > * Andrew W. Nosenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > I understand. But you're implying that there is Makefile and it supports >> > DESTDIR. As I understand, you're referring to autotools-based ports. >> > Remember, those are less than 1/4 of the collection. >> Excuse me,

Re: [ImageMagick] build problem

2008-12-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:48:07AM +0100, regisr wrote: > When building ImageMagick-6.4.7-5 on FreeBSD 6.4 I have a build error: > > /usr/obj/home/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.7-5/tests/.libs/co > nstitute -storagetype > double /usr/obj/home/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/Image

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2008-12-11 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

2008-12-11 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Andrew W. Nosenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I understand. But you're implying that there is Makefile and it supports > > DESTDIR. As I understand, you're referring to autotools-based ports. > > Remember, those are less than 1/4 of the collection. > Excuse me, but he refers not to autotools-

build problem

2008-12-11 Thread regisr
When building ImageMagick-6.4.7-5 on FreeBSD 6.4 I have a build error: /usr/obj/home/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.7-5/tests/.libs/co nstitute -storagetype double /usr/obj/home/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/Image Magick-6.4.7-5/tests/input_truecolor.miff cmy Constitute check fa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

2008-12-11 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> This is what Debian and Gentoo does. Remember we don't have to pass >> DESTDIR variable to 'make -C /usr/ports/editors/emacs-cvs' instead it >> will be passed t

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2008-12-11 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: phpwebgallery-1.7.2: no entry for /usr/ports/security/pecl-filter make_index: php5-extensions-1.2: no entry for /usr/ports/security/pe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

2008-12-11 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> This is what Debian and Gentoo does. Remember we don't have to pass >> DESTDIR variable to 'make -C /usr/ports/editors/emacs-cvs' instead it >> will be passed t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

2008-12-11 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This is what Debian and Gentoo does. Remember we don't have to pass > DESTDIR variable to 'make -C /usr/ports/editors/emacs-cvs' instead it > will be passed to the 'gmake' process invoked by port's Makefile. If we I understand. But you're im

FreeBSD Port: omake-0.9.8.1_1

2008-12-11 Thread Akira Kitada
Hi, Could you please update omake to the latest veraion? Thanks, ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"