-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (I am adding freebsd-ports@ to the thread as you suggested)
>
>
> Xin LI wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi, Panagiotis,
>>
>> Panagiotis Christias wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I
Hello,
(I am adding freebsd-ports@ to the thread as you suggested)
Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Panagiotis,
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
Hello,
I came across another dependency bug. It looks like packages that depend
on net/openldap24-client (e.g. mail/sen
Please fix :)
adodb/space/portstreesports/databases/adodb m...@freebsd.org
adodb/space/portstreesports/databases/adodb5 m...@freebsd.org
apache /space/portstreesports/www/apache13 apa...@freebsd.org
apache /space/portstree
On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:27:44 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> BTW, I can reliably reproduce this on amd64, but can not do it in
> i386 jail. Ports tree is exactly the same, ditto for portmaster
> version.
I have seen it on i386... after seeing your initial post
I tried a make and got a clean compile.
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/05/2009 14:59 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> In any case, it must be a bug in dmake code.
>
> BTW, I can reliably reproduce this on amd64, but can not do it in i386 jail.
> Ports tree is exactly the same, ditto for portmaster version.
Ok, that sounds like a dmake
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
A small addendum:
> As I understand, that's .so.1.39 vs .so.139 vs .so.5
.so.139 may be not futureproof as there were (and may be later)
3-component versions i.e. 1.34.1.
Also, given that boost seem to update fairy regularily, many (pretty
huge) port
on 20/05/2009 14:59 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> In any case, it must be a bug in dmake code.
BTW, I can reliably reproduce this on amd64, but can not do it in i386 jail.
Ports tree is exactly the same, ditto for portmaster version.
--
Andriy Gapon
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Could somebody officially and explicitly tell me, how to assign shared
> library versions for new boost ports?
>
> I see following possibilities:
>
> 1) Use boost release version as shared library version.
> This is safe and recomme
Folks,
Could somebody officially and explicitly tell me, how to assign shared
library versions for new boost ports?
I see following possibilities:
1) Use boost release version as shared library version.
This is safe and recommended by boost.
2) Use some other approach.
I do not see alte
Sean McAfee wrote:
Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
Hi, all.
please appreciate my port *megacli*
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655
Is that different from this the port, is it an update?
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Sean McAfee wrote:
IMO, linux-megacli, linux-megacli2, and megacli should all exist as
independent ports.
Do they provide different functionality or are we just keeping them
around for nostalgic purposes?
Regards,
Frank Laszlo
Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
Hi, all.
please appreciate my port *megacli*
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655
Is that different from this the port, is it an update?
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli
Since the meg
Sean McAfee wrote:
IMO, linux-megacli, linux-megacli2, and megacli should all exist as
independent ports.
Ah the linux- ports confusing re-arrises.
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Phi
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
Hi, all.
please appreciate my port *megacli*
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655
Is that different from this the port, is it an update?
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli
Since the megacli application now ha
on 20/05/2009 05:11 Doug Barton said the following:
> portmaster has no knowledge of dmake,
I am certain of this too :-)
> and it doesn't set make variables unless the user specifies them.
sure
> It does set a few enviornment variables, but nothing that should have an
> effect
> here. It woul
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
> My experience is that openoffice will NOT build properly if gcc43 is
> installed. So maybe it deinstalled gcc43, built openoffice, and then
> rebuilt gcc43.
No. Gcc-4.3 is primary compiler for my projects and OOo also need
ofte
Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
> Hi, all.
> please appreciate my port *megacli*
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655
Is that different from this the port, is it an update?
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli
--
---
In order for gnome2 to built with LOCALBASE = something other than /
usr/local, and net-im/telepathy-butterfly will need to add
CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --prefix=${PREFIX}
in order to correctly install into the alt LOCALBASE.
Otherwise, the port installs into /usr/local, and with LOCALBASE se
Hi, all.
please appreciate my port *megacli*
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655
--
Vladimir Ermakov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
19 matches
Mail list logo
