Re: bsd.port.options.mk

2009-05-22 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Philip M. Gollucci píše v čt 21. 05. 2009 v 22:34 -0400: +20090521: +AUTHOR: port...@freebsd.org + + * bsd.port.options.mk is now clear to be widely used. + Are there any existing examples of how one should use this or porters handbook sections ? There is an example in Porter's

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-22 Thread David Naylor
On Friday 22 May 2009 07:11:19 Maho NAKATA wrote: Dear, I appriciate David or Ion-Mihai make a patch for that. just seetting MAXMODULE=4 and/or MAXPROCESSES=4 or something like that. But note that sometimes it's broken :-( by missing dependencey. What do you mean by missing dependency? I

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-22 Thread Maho NAKATA
Hi David, From: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:24:30 +0200 On Friday 22 May 2009 07:11:19 Maho NAKATA wrote: Dear, I appriciate David or Ion-Mihai make a patch for that. just seetting MAXMODULE=4 and/or

Re: port net/openldap24-sasl-client fails to register as dependency

2009-05-22 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:08:58 +0300 Panagiotis Christias wrote: Ok, then how about dropping the net/openldap24-sasl-client port and adding an SASL OPTIONS entry to the net/openldap24-client port, like the server port? Then those who use packages will loose a possibility to use pkg_add -r.

[announce] bsd.port.options.mk available

2009-05-22 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dear, we finally decided that enough users migrated to recent enough FreeBSD versions that we can finally suggest that maintainers can start using bsd.port.options.mk file in their ports. The examples in Porter's Handbook had been updated to illustrate a new usage. This will solve the problem

Re: port net/openldap24-sasl-client fails to register as dependency

2009-05-22 Thread Panagiotis Christias
Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:08:58 +0300 Panagiotis Christias wrote: Ok, then how about dropping the net/openldap24-sasl-client port and adding an SASL OPTIONS entry to the net/openldap24-client port, like the server port? Then those who use packages will loose a possibility

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-22 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:53:50 +0900 (JST) Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote: In massive parallel build, OOo can be broken. We explicitly fix them otherwise broken. I just test with MAXJOB = 4 or something like that. I had it complain about perl (or something) needing to be recompiled but

Re: [announce] bsd.port.options.mk available

2009-05-22 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: we finally decided that enough users migrated to recent enough FreeBSD versions that we can finally suggest that maintainers can start using bsd.port.options.mk file in their ports. The examples in Porter's Handbook had been updated to illustrate a

port www/p5-libapreq2 broken after May 16th 2009

2009-05-22 Thread Nicolais
Hi, I saw that the port www/p5-libapreq2 was updated between May 16th and 17th (2009). Trying to upgrade the port, I get the following error: Writing Makefile for libapreq2 cd perl; gmake gmake[2]: Entering directory

Make package-recursive problem

2009-05-22 Thread Matt Juszczak
Hi all, I've started noticing more and more that packages I build are missing files after they are rebuilt. I've tested this time and time again, and seem to be able to show that about 10 ports (gettext, apache, net-snmp, some php modules, etc.) are built correctly the first time, but when

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 3

2009-05-22 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to the vbox ml. http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_4.tgz happy testing. - -

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 3

2009-05-22 Thread Gustau Pérez
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to the vbox ml. http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_4.tgz happy testing. Hi everyone, I'm using i386/CURRENT

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 3

2009-05-22 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:53:08PM +0200, Gustau Pérez wrote: We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to the vbox ml.

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 3

2009-05-22 Thread Gustau Pérez
rm -rf /tmp/.vbox-* doesen't help ? Nope. Vbox recreates the directory /tmp/.vbox-root-ipc. Nothing in /var/log/messages. Do you want an screenshot of it ? Regards, Gus -- PGP KEY : http://www-entel.upc.edu/gus/gus.asc ___

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 3

2009-05-22 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Gustau Pérez wrote: rm -rf /tmp/.vbox-* doesen't help ? Nope. Vbox recreates the directory /tmp/.vbox-root-ipc. Nothing in /var/log/messages. Do you want an screenshot of it ? Recreates are

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-22 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: I can run a few test builds on QAT and maybe Phillip can do the same on his tindy. Just drop us the patch ;-) Even if it only works with MAXJOB = 2, we mark it as such and the build will be faster. LOL. Do it once and I get volunteered. Too funny. Sure I'm up for some

Re: port net/openldap24-sasl-client fails to register as dependency

2009-05-22 Thread Panagiotis Christias
Uwe Laverenz wrote: Panagiotis Christias schrieb: I am already using that. Without it portinstall/upgrade would try every time to install net/openldap24-client (and fail). But it still does not register the dependency. There is a knob for this problem that should help you, please add

Policy on hard coded paths?

2009-05-22 Thread David N
Hi, I'm currently very interested in Zimbra, but unfortunately the developers decided on a Fat Package approach so everything is bundled directly into the source. It also has its path hard coded into /opt/zimbra. If someone manages to create a patch for it to be compiled and running successfully

Re: Policy on hard coded paths?

2009-05-22 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 23 May 2009, David N wrote: I'm currently very interested in Zimbra, but unfortunately the developers decided on a Fat Package approach so everything is bundled directly into the source. It also has its path hard coded into /opt/zimbra. If someone manages to create a patch for it