On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
Can you paste the 'ANSWER SECTON' from:
'dig portsnap2.freebsd.org'
Sure, but I'm curious to know why. The names all do resolve to A RRs,
and pings to each by name did get echos back. Here it is, although I did
On Sat, 30 May 2009 05:32:39 -0400 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
Can you paste the 'ANSWER SECTON' from:
=A0'dig portsnap2.freebsd.org'
=A0 =A0 Sure, but I'm curious to know why. =A0The names all do
On Sat, 30 May 2009, 05:39 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
Thanks for that much, then, Glen. So we still don't know what is wrong.
I did try it again around midnight CDT, and it still failed the same way.
In the meantime, my frustration and impatience got the better of me, and
I touched
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:05:44 +1000
John Marshall john.marsh...@riverwillow.com.au wrote:
Have you excluded local factors (proxy servers, firewalls)?
Try fetching the key manually
fetch http://portsnap2.FreeBSD.org/pub.ssl
___
Hi,
I'm proposing the following patch:
--- bsd.port.mk
+++ bsd.port.mk
@@ -2180,6 +2180,10 @@
.endif
.endif
+.if defined(USE_CSTD)
+CFLAGS+= -std=${USE_CSTD}
+.endif
+
# Multiple make jobs support
.if defined(DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS) || defined(MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE)
_MAKE_JOBS=#
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea. This knob is completely superfluous and
thus should be avoided. One can just add -std to CFLAGS from a port
Makefile. Forced build are also possible without this stuff, you can set
this in /etc/make.conf.
So how
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:05:44 +1000 John Marshall
john.marsh...@riverwillow.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009, 05:39 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
Thanks for that much, then, Glen. So we still don't know what is wr=
ong.
I did try it again around midnight CDT, and it still failed the
Ed Schouten escribió:
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea. This knob is completely superfluous and
thus should be avoided. One can just add -std to CFLAGS from a port
Makefile. Forced build are also possible without this stuff, you can set
this in
Ed Schouten escribió:
Hi,
I'm proposing the following patch:
--- bsd.port.mk
+++ bsd.port.mk
@@ -2180,6 +2180,10 @@
.endif
.endif
+.if defined(USE_CSTD)
+CFLAGS+= -std=${USE_CSTD}
+.endif
+
# Multiple make jobs support
.if defined(DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS) || defined(MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE)
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for LLVM, probably it won't work out for the whole ports
tree. I don't know what's the portmgr opinion on this, if we start to
use LLVM in Ports Collection, we should reconsider the knob, though.
LLVM/Clang support is trivial. Erwin Lansing
Hi,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 04:34:43PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for LLVM, probably it won't work out for the whole ports
tree. I don't know what's the portmgr opinion on this, if we start to
use LLVM in Ports Collection, we should reconsider
On Saturday 30 May 2009 16:21:52 Ed Schouten wrote:
Really, I really don't care how it's done, whether it's a flag or added
to the compiler flags directly. I'm just saying adding it to CFLAGS
directly sounds like a very bad idea. Adding it to /etc/make.conf sounds
even worse, because it
* Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.po...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
Are there any edge cases of (antiquated) ports that (indirectly) use
bsd.sys.mk and as such get hit by:
11 # the default is gnu99 for now
12 CSTD?= gnu99
In other words should one clean CFLAGS of -std before
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 04:48:15PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
but what is the general policy on such ports?
They can come back if they're not vulnerable and someone volunteers
to maintain them. (deleted ports may have had ports@ as the maintainer,
but we don't allow that for port (re)additions.)
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:01:38AM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote:
By the time FreeBSD-9 is released clang support will be solid and all
ports will compile with clang as well as gcc.
ooh, can I have unicorns, too? :-)
Seriously, I'd like to see the potential to throw the switch, with
the caveat that
Hi,
I sent an update for this port
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135065)
I also would like to be maintainer of this port.
Thanks.
--
Ismail YENIGUL
Endersys Ltd.
Phone :+90 216-4709423 | Mobile:+90 533 747 36 65
Fax :+90 216-4709508 | web: http://www.endersys.com.tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:58:30AM +0300, Ismail YENIGUL wrote:
Hi,
I sent an update for this port
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135065)
I also would like to be maintainer of this port.
Done
Thanks.
--
Ismail
From: Oliver Lehmann lehm...@ans-netz.de
Subject: unable to build openoffice.org-3
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:17:28 +0200
Hi,
I'm getting this error when compiling openoffice 3.1.0 on FreeBSD/amd64 7
/mnt/misc/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO310_m11/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
It would be very nice to those of us that install setiathome on remote
servers to be able to build it without needing all of X and GL.
I'm not the only one since there *is* an option in configure
(--disable-graphics) to do this (but when I did the obvious to the
makefile to add this option,
On Sun, 31 May 2009 00:58:30 +0300
Ismail YENIGUL ismail.yeni...@endersys.com.tr wrote:
Hi,
I sent an update for this port
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135065) I also would like
to be maintainer of this port.
It doesn't seem sensible that p5-FuzzyOcr contains an obsolete
Hi,
In the ongoing QA effort, the second QA Tinderbox - QATty - is
currently doing a full run of the Ports Tree with PREFIX, LOCALBASE and
X11BASE set to a custom directory.
The build is done with PT from 2009-05-28 18:03:14; I'll be probably
updating it after each category is built.
I had same trouble. And I found a solution/workaround.
According to
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userm=124299851715437w=2
o no need to set @bypass_spam_check_maps, just comment out
o set @spam_scanners properly, for example @spam_scanners='undef' if you
do not want amavisd-new to check spam
The
On Sun, 31 May 2009 05:56:01 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, 31 May 2009 05:56:01 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
In the ongoing QA effort, the second QA Tinderbox - QATty - is
currently doing a full run of the Ports Tree with PREFIX, LOCALBASE
23 matches
Mail list logo
