Re: vim ports broken.

2009-06-24 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santosunixma...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Philip M. Golluccipgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote: Helmut Schneider wrote: matt donovan kitchet...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri,

Re: vim ports broken.

2009-06-24 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Frank J. Laszlolasz...@freebsd.org wrote: Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: [...] Opps, now I got it: the official 7.2.041 patch can not be applied cleanly so David provided a custom one. Choosing % to differentiate it, however, was a bad idea. It would be better

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 10:27:59 pm Eitan Adler wrote: I would like for it to be a real category, so we can unclutter the misc/ folder, and encourage more local/internationalized stuff in the new category. I would like it to be a virtual category.

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote: On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category becomes a catch all for both entities. If i18n is too cryptic or too

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 05:35:16 pm Tim Bishop wrote: If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is too long, why not go with nls? How about internationalisation? ;-) Tim. As a Canadian who prefers en_GB, I fought every

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Chris Rees
2009/6/24 Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 05:35:16 pm Tim Bishop wrote: If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is too long, why not go with nls? How about internationalisation? ;-) Tim.

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: [snip] Though I still reserve the right to hate the inconsistent use of 'z' (why internationalize but surmise; I guess surmise just hasn't been US-ized yet :P realize but enterprise, etc etc)! Er, isn't this a

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Chris Rees
2009/6/24 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: [snip] Though I still reserve the right to hate the inconsistent use of 'z' (why internationalize but surmise; I guess surmise just hasn't been US-ized yet :P realize but enterprise, etc

thank you for portmaster

2009-06-24 Thread Dan Naumov
Hey Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster. After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the great work! Sincerely, - Dan Naumov ___

Re: thank you for portmaster

2009-06-24 Thread Doug Barton
Dan Naumov wrote: Hey Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster. After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the great work! Thank you for the kind words, they are greatly

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Charlie Kester
On Wed 24 Jun 2009 at 06:56:10 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote: On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category becomes a

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 24, 2009 02:24:01 pm Charlie Kester wrote: On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote: On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category becomes a catch

Re: thank you for portmaster

2009-06-24 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dan Naumovdan.nau...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster. After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the great work!

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

2009-06-24 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:11 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: Scott Bennett wrote: Thank you for doing that. Unfortunately, it might have been more appropriate to have simply replaced that note with another that cautions anyone attempting the perl upgrade that the upgrade

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

2009-06-24 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:31:36 +0300 Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote: ÷ Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:12:17 -0500 (CDT) Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu ÐÉÛÅÔ: SB On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:42:51 -0700 Doug Barton SB do...@freebsd.org wrote: SB Jim Trigg wrote: SB Actually, he was

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread Eitan Adler
I'm constantly involved in a fight between my 'evil' and 'good' side; I can't stand the usual US spellings as a Brit, but I always end up admitting to myself that US spellings generally: make more sense; Coming from an American: $make more sense; make: don't know how to make more. Stop