Flow-tools and Flow-tools-ng - Flow-Capture - supposed to be memory leak - patch

2009-08-15 Thread Zvezdelin Vladov
Dear Sir/Madam, Please, publish in the official ports build patch system, the patch bellow for the problem that manifest itself only on the amd64 platform, and it is one and the same for both the flow-tools and flow-tools-ng - i.e. flow-capture eats all of the RAM and SWAP of the machine, until

Dovecot port requires mention in UPDATING

2009-08-15 Thread Oliver Heesakkers
The configuration file of dovecot 1.1 will most likely not work for Dovecot 1.2 Shouldn't this be mentioned in UPDATING? See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Dovecot port requires mention in UPDATING

2009-08-15 Thread Wesley Shields
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 02:01:27PM +0200, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: The configuration file of dovecot 1.1 will most likely not work for Dovecot 1.2 Shouldn't this be mentioned in UPDATING? See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2 Yes, I will get something in there now. Sorry for the

portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Thomas Backman
First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I won't see your answers! :) Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update So, long story short: [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF --- Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread N.J. Mann
In message b787d58e-9157-48e7-adf3-e8d54f8af...@exscape.org, Thomas Backman (seren...@exscape.org) wrote: First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I won't see your answers! :) Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update So,

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
N.J. Mann wrote: Some years ago I tried using portupgrade, but had all sorts of problems with its database getting corrupted. In desparation I tried portmaster and have been a very happy since. (Thanks Doug!). Well I don't know about the desperation part, but you're welcome in any case. :)

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
Thomas Backman wrote: First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I won't see your answers! :) Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update So, long story short: [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF --- Checking the package registry database

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF --- Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '' dnsmasq ezm3 libtool python26 [r...@chaos ~]# pkg_version | awk '$2 !~ /=/'

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Thomas Backman
On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF --- Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '' dnsmasq ezm3 libtool python26

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread N.J. Mann
In message 6b5b7698-ccd8-48ff-a5fb-0349d4cc1...@exscape.org, Thomas Backman (seren...@exscape.org) wrote: On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF --- Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]#

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
Thomas Backman wrote: However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). libtool-1.5.26 ! Comparison failed This is

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
Thomas Backman wrote: Thanks, guys! However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). [r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]# portsnap -I fetch

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Jason J. Hellenthal
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:48:53 +0200 Thomas Backman seren...@exscape.org wrote: On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF --- Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '' dnsmasq

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable=YES to /etc/periodic.conf.local and youll be informed of packages that need updating. Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette: 1. Read the whole

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Jason J. Hellenthal
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable=YES to /etc/periodic.conf.local and youll be informed of packages that need updating. Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good

FreeBSD Port: kdebase-workspace-4.3.0

2009-08-15 Thread Ronald J Robinson
Folks, Am compiling KDE4 (from scratch) am getting a stop in kdebase4-workspace. Stop is due to a missing xml file /usr/local/kde4/share/dbus-1/interfaces/org.kde.NotificationItemWatcher.xml. I believe I have compiled the dependencies with all the latest sources.. What am I missing Thank

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Doug Barton wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: Thanks, guys! However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). [r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]#

Re: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_5 remote code execution exploit

2009-08-15 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:16:44AM +0200, Klaus Koch wrote: as of 6th of August, there's a possible remote code execution exploit known in both Sun JDK and JRE 6 Update 14 and earlier and Sun JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 19 and earlier [...] I didn't get any notifications with portaudit yet. Because

startx won't start twm with empty xinitrc

2009-08-15 Thread Nikolay Tychina
Hi! I rebuilt whole x11/xorg (due to problem with google earth - it's been missing earth picture) but i didn't solve that problem. Even more, now I'm trying to startx with empty ~/.xinitrc (twm should be run as default WM), but twm won't start. X server just shut down without errors. With exec