On 15.11.2009 09:35 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
wrote:
I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port.
Now that I am able to directly download the sources of SAGA GIS from
sourceforge (thanks to Eygene
Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:19AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
Why are you putting saga into math? It should be in databases, like
grass and postgis are,
Let's see. /usr/ports/databases/postgis/pkg-descr:
-
PostGIS adds support for geographic objects to the PostgreSQL
object-relational
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:55:21 +0300 Eygene Ryabinkin rea-f...@codelabs.ru
wrote:
Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:19AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
Why are you putting saga into math? It should be in databases, like
grass and postgis are,
Let's see. /usr/ports/databases/postgis/pkg-descr:
-
On Sun, November 15, 2009 12:24 am, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Hello,
Is there a reason why p5-xmltv haven't been updated? In ports we have
version 0.5.52, but on the main web site version 0.5.56 have been
available a while now.
Simply chnaging the version in the Makefile, removing the
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:10:39AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 15.11.2009 09:35 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
wrote:
I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port.
Now that I am able to directly download
On 15.11.2009 15:26 (UTC+1), B. Estrade wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:10:39AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 15.11.2009 09:35 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
wrote:
I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bernhard Froehlich de...@bluelife.atwrote:
Looks like MAN1 in the Makefile should be updated too. If it installs and
deinstalls fine please submit it as PR.
If anyone would test what I have so far (attached), it would help.
It is tested with porttools
On Sun, November 15, 2009 6:27 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bernhard Froehlich
de...@bluelife.atwrote:
Looks like MAN1 in the Makefile should be updated too. If it installs
and
deinstalls fine please submit it as PR.
If anyone would test what I
, FreeBSD
7.2/i386 and with a QATty tinderbox so i'm quite sure it will not look
too bad. Runtime testing is about zero so we need feedback before we
get it into the tree.
Download:
- http://home.bluelife.at/ports/mythtv-0.22-20091115.tar.gz
Highlights:
- enabled ivtv with patch from usleepless
On 2009-Nov-14 15:46:27 +, Thomas Sandford
freebsdu...@paradisegreen.co.uk wrote:
Wesley Shields wrote:
Sure, but it doesn't belong in bsd.*.mk. Turn it into a script and
submit it as a regular port.
If it were just one port and/or just a port maintainers tool I'd agree.
But this is
Hi m...@freebsd.org
cc: po...@freebsd.org
A hint would be welcome please with sysutils/libcdio, Paranoia stuff seems
broken, but I'm not clear what's intended, hence mail rather than a send-pr.
uname -a
FreeBSD laps.js.berklix.net 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #2: \
Wed Sep 9
Is there a reason why BUILD_DEPENDS aren't being removed after a port
has been installed and if no other installed port depends on it?
Sandra
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:44:04PM +0100, Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
Is there a reason why BUILD_DEPENDS aren't being removed after a port
has been installed and if no other installed port depends on it?
How do you know that the user does not want that port installed?
And what if the user will
13 matches
Mail list logo
