On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:43:07 +, Thomas Sandford
wrote:
> (Sorry, Ive lost track of the higher level attributions, but)
> Eitan Adler wrote:
Creating deterministic tars (ignoring "metadeta") sounds like it
should be a solved problem by now. If it isn't then I will have to
make it
Status update.
I've now begun producing regular builds from GCC SVN for GCC, G++, GNAT
and fortran on 7.2 amd64. The build logs are published here:
http://gcc.coreland.ath.cx/
I'm hoping this will increase awareness of regressions before they make
their way back into releases (the formal GCC r
(Sorry, Ive lost track of the higher level attributions, but)
Eitan Adler wrote:
Creating deterministic tars (ignoring "metadeta") sounds like it
should be a solved problem by now. If it isn't then I will have to
make it my next project ;)
Instead of creating tar files, create zip files and the
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> Actually, I *had* a patch that got the source from svn, tarred it
>>> and checksummed it, with little modification to the do-fetch target
>>> and abusing FETCH_* variables.
>>> The unsolv
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:52:04AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> It is the maintainer's responsibility to update the port. If the
> existing maintainer has vanished, you can take over maintainership by
> submitting a PR that updates the port and changes the MAINTAINER line.
> If the ports team are
