Re: [RFC] PHP 5.3

2010-03-25 Thread Alex Dupre
Sean McAfee ha scritto: Do you happen to have the patchset posted anywhere? I'd be more than happy to just use those locally until the unfreeze happens. http://www.alexdupre.com/php53.diff Since I'll be away in the next week, I'm going to commit this patchset in April. Removed ports:

Re: FreeBSD Port: tomcat-6.0.24

2010-03-25 Thread Alex Dupre
Ян Злобин ha scritto: Please, fix small FreeBSD port error. In the tomcat-6.0.24 rc.d script missed line: procname=java This is the wrong way to fix it, you should create a patch using the tomcat_check_pidfile() rc function. -- Alex Dupre

postgres and CVE-2010-0442

2010-03-25 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. Could someone look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144863 ? There is quite serious security issue in postgres, which allow any user to kill others' sessions. -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of South Federal University

Re: postgres and CVE-2010-0442

2010-03-25 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:12:21 +0300 Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru wrote: Hello. Could someone look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144863 ? There is quite serious security issue in postgres, which allow any user to kill others' sessions. It's only been a week since it was

FreeBSD Port: assp-1.5.1.2_4

2010-03-25 Thread Miro Voutilainen
Hi Are you thinking of upgrading this release to 1.7.x.x soon? I am running 1.7.x.x successfully on several installations (linux). I would like to upgrade my bsd's to latest version also. Thank you. Regards, mkv ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: postgres and CVE-2010-0442

2010-03-25 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:44:20PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: It's only been a week since it was assigned to the maintainer (girgen@) to look at. It's too soon for a maintainer timeout, although I suppose if this is considered to be an enormous security risk it could be committed without

Exchange ActiveSync account

2010-03-25 Thread Jack Raats
Hi, I have an Exchange ActiveSync account and I would like to get this mail on my freebsd 7.3-stable server. I donn't haven an imap or pop account, only the information of the activesync account. Can anyone give me a clue how to achieve this? Thanks for your time! Jack Raats

Re: Exchange ActiveSync account

2010-03-25 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Jack Raats wrote: Hi, I have an Exchange ActiveSync account and I would like to get this mail on my freebsd 7.3-stable server. I donn't haven an imap or pop account, only the information of the activesync account. Can anyone give me a clue how to achieve this? Take a

Re: Exchange ActiveSync account

2010-03-25 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Mar 25, 2010, at 6:16 AM, Jack Raats wrote: I have an Exchange ActiveSync account and I would like to get this mail on my freebsd 7.3-stable server. I donn't haven an imap or pop account, only the information of the activesync account. Can anyone give me a clue how to achieve

Re: HEADS UP: Update for png14 in test on the cluster

2010-03-25 Thread Eitan Adler
Current preview of the patchs (roughly 4500 ports). http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/logs/png141-patch3 I noticed that x11/xorg is modified but not x11/xorg-minimal - is there a reason for this? Index: ports/x11/xorg/Makefile

help with converting from configure to cmake (devel/allegro)

2010-03-25 Thread Eitan Adler
I'm currently the maintainer of devel/allegro which, due to my lack of time, is very outdated. The allegro team switched to cmake for the recent version. I do not know how to enable/disable specific options with cmake in the ports system. I attached the Makefile I am currently using (which builds

default binutils - linker 2.15 versus 2.20

2010-03-25 Thread CeDeROM
Hello world! I have problems building applications requiring ld 2.20 (located at /usr/local/bin) where ld 2.15 (located at /usr/bin) is being invoked with c++ (gcc4.2.1). Why there are two linkers on the system? Is it possible to update the default linker to version 2.20? Please advise, Tomek

Re: HEADS UP: Update for png14 in test on the cluster

2010-03-25 Thread Dirk Meyer
Hallo Eitan Adler, Current preview of the patchs (roughly 4500 ports). http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/logs/png141-patch3 I noticed that x11/xorg is modified but not x11/xorg-minimal - is there a reason for this? Yes, Acording to my index the x11/xorg-minimal does not have an dependecy