On 17/05/10 3:49 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/16/10 20:35, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 5/05/10 1:54 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
Is there an apache-2.2.13 package in packages/All? And what do the links
in packages/www and packages/Latest refer to?
I did some more digging in the script itself. You
On 05/16/10 23:14, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
Perhaps I've confused the threads. But this issue appears to be a simple
one: I've installed the www/apache22 port but with certain settings it
installs the package called apache-worker. And with the index-only
option, it thinks it can see 2.2.13
Synopsis: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes
State-Changed-From-To: feedback-suspended
State-Changed-By: delphij
State-Changed-When: Mon May 17 06:59:21 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Maintainer approved the change but requests hold off until
print/hplip update.
On 17/05/10 4:17 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
The INDEX has to be generated with the same settings as the packages
were created with.
Well, before we tried to run portsnap to update it, we also just copied
/usr/ports/INDEX* from the build machine to the production server. We tried
portsnap since
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:48 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
In reference to the following:
revision 1.107
date: 2010/05/16 22:07:20; author: kwm; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3
Correct depend on Numpy instead of Numeric.
PR: ports/146601
Submitted by: Martin Tournoij
Hi,
Sorry for long response, I will try to see what changes were made and I will
fill PR for that port update.
Edmondas
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Vlad GURDIGA gurd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Edmondas,
Thanks a lot for porting pwauth!
I found there are some changes in the 2.3.8
Hi,
It seems than the new version of devel/pylint port is not compatible with the
old config files in user's home.
At least I was getting an error as in the following.
$ pylint --version
Synopsis: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes
State-Changed-From-To: suspended-closed
State-Changed-By: pav
State-Changed-When: Mon May 17 13:17:02 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Committed, thanks!
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146626
The following reply was made to PR ports/146626; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/146626: commit references a PR
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:17:12 + (UTC)
pav 2010-05-17 13:16:57 UTC
Jack L. wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Oliver Lehmann lehm...@ans-netz.de wrote:
Hi Jack,
Re: Status of Xorg 7.5 and xfce4? writes:
Are you using 32 or 64 bit? I'm still having problems with 64 bit and
xfce4-session
It is an amd64 System
What were the steps you did to
Hi,
xfce 4.6.2 is scheduled to be release on the 21st/22nd of May.
Please don't expect an update of the xfce4 ports before the 29th as
I'm on a one-week holiday starting exactly on the 22nd where I won't have
any computer access.
Just sending this to prevent emails asking me how long it will
On 05/17/10 03:08, Koop Mast wrote:
Done. Yeah it excessive, I noticed it on QAT by chance. It is a optional
dependancy now.
Works perfectly, thank you for the quick response. :)
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
--
Hi Vladimir,
On, Mon May 17, 2010, chukha...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
It seems than the new version of devel/pylint port is not compatible with the
old config files in user's home.
[...]
Everything work since renaming ~/.pylintrc and ~/.pylint.d. I think this is
good to mention in
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:19:49PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On, Mon May 17, 2010, chukha...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
It seems than the new version of devel/pylint port is not compatible with
the old config files in user's home.
[...]
Everything work since renaming
The next wave of the challenge, fear, there is one more already
composed to be released with 8.1!
--
Give Freeze a chance
with apologies to John Lennon et al
Ev'rybody's talkin' 'bout
portism, srcism, docism, cvsism, svnism, tagism
This-ism, that-ism, ism ism ism
All we are saying is give
personally, I do not think that (incompatibly) changed user options or
configuration settings for this port are 'worth' an entry in UPDATING,
thus I skipped it.
UPDATING entries are cheap. It can't hurt to have this as an entry to
help users of the port.
On 05/17/10 00:51, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 17/05/10 4:17 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
The INDEX has to be generated with the same settings as the packages
were created with.
Well, before we tried to run portsnap to update it, we also just copied
/usr/ports/INDEX* from the build machine to
Hello, list.
Is there any work going to get linux-js port working on freebsd 8?
I've found some mailing-list thread, but it is kind of outdated.
Wbr,
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
When I try to build libX11 or libSM I find similar error messages
about an older version of automake 1.10 that they both require and I
haven't been able to make either use a newer one.
Details:
7.3-STABLE FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #1010: Thu May 6 05:36:44 CDT 2010
Ports tree up to date as of
On 05/17/2010 19:02, eculp wrote:
When I try to build libX11 or libSM I find similar error messages about
an older version of automake 1.10 that they both require and I haven't
been able to make either use a newer one.
Details:
7.3-STABLE FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #1010: Thu May 6 05:36:44 CDT
Hello,
Today I decided to set up portscout on my server. Everything seemed fine
until I went to run portscout generate to make the HTML output:
portscout v0.7.4, by Shaun Amott
Found 21749 ports
Organising results...
DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: cannot insert multiple commands into
a
a little confusion arised from ports/146627.
The Porter's Handbook defines PREFIX as the place where port should
install its files including config files. However, it doesn't say where
the port should try to read its config files that may not exist:
LOCALBASE/etc or PREFIX/etc? Until recently I
22 matches
Mail list logo
