> From: "Philip M. Gollucci"
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:03:08 +
>
> On 06/15/10 00:46, Marco Bröder wrote:
>> I find it especially important to have a expression for 'version X or any
>> later version' (for example 'LGPLv2+'), since the following dummy example is
>> not adequate:
> A very go
On Jun 14, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Marco Br?der wrote:
> But it is not very useful in its current state, because several popular
>> licenses are missing and some license foo is not right / specific enough to
>> be
>> considered legally correct (for example ther
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Marco Br?der wrote:
But it is not very useful in its current state, because several popular
licenses are missing and some license foo is not right / specific enough to be
considered legally correct (for example there is no 'one BSD License', there
are at least three of them,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/15/10 00:46, Marco Bröder wrote:
> I find it especially important to have a expression for 'version X or any
> later version' (for example 'LGPLv2+'), since the following dummy example is
> not adequate:
A very good idea, but not neccessarily t
Hello,
I know the ports license framework is very new and not mature yet.
But it is not very useful in its current state, because several popular
licenses are missing and some license foo is not right / specific enough to be
considered legally correct (for example there is no 'one BSD License',
This LICENSE stuff is beginning to look more complex than it seemed at
first.
From this thread I gather that maintainers are going to have to do a bit
more than simply check a box. Here, for example, we see some well-known
licenses that don't readily identify themselves as such. How can a
ma
Hi--
On Jun 14, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/14/10 09:59, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a
>>> few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have
>>> the follow
On 06/14/10 09:59, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a
few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have
the following: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt
Yes, tha
On 06/14/10 08:05, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Doug Barton writes:
[...]
Then there is security/libassuan which seems to be dual licensed under
GPLv3 and LGPLv2, did we ever decide how to handle that?
In one of the dual-licensed port's Makefile, I added:
#v+
LICENSE= GPLv3 LGPL3
LICENSE_FILE_GPLv3
On 06/14/10 04:48, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Even having replaced libassuan with libassuan-1, there still seems to be
a problem for some ports:
Yes, I fixed that shortly after the first update, thanks to QAT. :)
I had tested picking up the new dependency for building the port, but
didn't test fo
Hi--
On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few
> questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the following:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt
Yes, that's the ISC license, http://www.ope
Doug Barton writes:
[...]
> Then there is security/libassuan which seems to be dual licensed under
> GPLv3 and LGPLv2, did we ever decide how to handle that?
In one of the dual-licensed port's Makefile, I added:
#v+
LICENSE= GPLv3 LGPL3
LICENSE_FILE_GPLv3= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING
LICENSE_FILE_LGP
Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> I am experiencing what seems like the problem in
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133758
>
> I have net-snmp-5.5 installed on FreeBSD 7.2 i386 and it returns this:
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 189072 kB
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INT
x11-wm/stumpwm, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
preparing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/06/2010 12:23:52, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/14/10 02:30, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Is anyone else seeing problems with
>>
>> Upgrading 'gnupg-2.0.14_2' to 'gnupg-2.0.14_3'
>
> Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Even having replaced li
On 06/10/2010 06:14, Frank Reid wrote:
> I've been running gwhois for a long time, but recently it stopped working
> due to a missing dependency on p5-Net-LibIDN-0.12. The port doesn't appear
> to recognize that perl module is needed. Thanks for maintaining the port.
>
I have tested all three o
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:20:53PM -0400, FreeBSD portmgr secretary wrote:
> In preparation for 8.1-RELEASE, the ports tree will be in feature freeze
> after release candidate 1 (RC1) is released, currently planned for June 11.
As you may have noticed, RC1 has not been released as yet, but the del
On 06/14/10 02:30, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi
Is anyone else seeing problems with
Upgrading 'gnupg-2.0.14_2' to 'gnupg-2.0.14_3'
Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
hth,
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Hello list,
I am experiencing what seems like the problem in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133758
I have net-snmp-5.5 installed on FreeBSD 7.2 i386 and it returns this:
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 189072 kB
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 273204 kB
When this is
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few
questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the
following: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt
I also have dns/fpdns which has this:
http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/LICENSE.txt which looks like i
22 matches
Mail list logo
