As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
Anonymous writes:
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513
Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract?
I added because specifying '${WRKSRC}/LICENSE' as 'LICENSE_FILE'
Anonymous writes:
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
Anonymous writes:
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513
Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract?
I added because specifying '${WRKSRC}/LICENSE'
lini...@freebsd.org writes:
Hello,
The PRs are listed below.
PR number: 87397
PR title: [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make variable in some
ports
category: print
portname: lpr-wrapper
submitter: ga...@zahemszky.hu
arrival date:
Hi, this is a problem.
a standalone server should start with
$MOINDEST/server/moin server standalone
I will modify Makefile to fit this changes.
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Morton tungolcra...@gmail.com wrote:
The current version of the moinmoin port seems to be pretty
- Original Message -
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
No, look at ports-mgmt/portupgrade, it is capable of upgrading ports
in-place quite happily in most cases. With the caveat that there might
be some special steps that need to be taken not covered by port itself.
This usually happens when
Good morning, is there a plan to upgrade the FreeBSD Opera port to the
latest version (10.60)?
Yours sincerely
--
Marco Alberoni
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
difficult to distinguish from quotes.
Rather than write `find port_dir` (note the backticks), IMO, it is
far easier to write $(find port_dir) -
On 21/07/2010 03:07, Wesley Shields wrote:
Dan, my initial testing indicates that this allows the port to build.
I'd appreciate another set of eyeballs on it though. Please let me know
if you would like me to commit this patch or not.
http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/bacula-unbreak.diff
--
Il 07/19/10 12:33, Matthew Seaman ha scritto:
Would it be sensible to make either WITH_POSTGRESQL or WITH_MYSQL the
default options setting for this port rather than WITH_SQLITE? In my
experience for backing up any reasonably sized system, you do need a
fully competent RDBMS for the bacula
Marco Alberoni writes:
Good morning, is there a plan to upgrade the FreeBSD Opera port
to the latest version (10.60)?
Ask the maintainer. :-)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select
WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it
fails to link:
Linking
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:42:52 +0200, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Marco Alberoni writes:
Good morning, is there a plan to upgrade the FreeBSD Opera port
to the latest version (10.60)?
Ask the maintainer. :-)
He already did :). The PR for the port is under evaluation.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select
WITH_POSTGRESQL in the
On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
difficult to distinguish from quotes.
Rather than write
Good day!
We now have two ports with name 'hydra' in the tree, one in security
category, and one in www.
Both installs file ${PREFIX}/bin/hydra.
I firstly think about asking for add CONFLICTS line, but then come up
to ports tree should not have
two ports with same name.
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port
On 21/07/2010, at 10:56 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
On 21/07/2010 15:31, Sean wrote:
On 21/07/2010, at 10:56 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust
Sean s...@gothic.net.au writes:
The text as its currently exists is a long way from being clear to a
first timer. And I am talking about the new change that just went in.
shar `find port_dir` (note the backticks),
or
shar $(find port_dir)
This one doesn't work in (t)csh, the
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:45:18 PDT, Doug Barton wrote:
soo ... is the blob that gets added to make.conf after you
install ports-mgmt/portconf in both make.conf files?
Yes.
I'm thinking that packages/Latest/perl is stale. Can you check it?
If it is stale, updating it should do the trick.
On 7/21/2010 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM
cvs-src writes:
Good day!
We now have two ports with name 'hydra' in the tree, one in security
category, and one in www.
Both installs file ${PREFIX}/bin/hydra.
I firstly think about asking for add CONFLICTS line, but then come up
to ports tree should not have
two
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:37:29PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010
On 7/21/2010 12:53 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:37:29PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA пишет:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
I don't think that
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Douglas Berry wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:45:18 PDT, Doug Barton wrote:
soo ... is the blob that gets added to make.conf after you
install ports-mgmt/portconf in both make.conf files?
Yes.
I'm thinking that packages/Latest/perl is stale. Can you check it?
If it
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov writes:
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA пишет:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA ??:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like
GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
I don't
On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
Christopher Keycj...@cam.ac.uk writes:
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
...
If you can suggest which is the
preferred solution, I'll put together a patch.
I don't know what workaround is preferred but I'd suggest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/10 20:30, Christopher Key wrote:
On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
Christopher Keycj...@cam.ac.uk writes:
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
...
If you can suggest which is the
preferred
On 21/07/2010 21:34, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/10 20:30, Christopher Key wrote:
On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
Christopher Keycj...@cam.ac.uk writes:
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_ confusing to the users, however
(and, if you go
At present, the interaction between portconf and port options is
somewhat confusing. Firstly, the output of make showconfig and the
defaults displayed by make config are unaffected by anything set in
ports.conf. Secondly, its quite easy to unexpectedly end up having both
WITH_XXX and
Philip M. Gollucci pgollu...@p6m7g8.com writes:
On 07/21/10 20:30, Christopher Key wrote:
On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
Christopher Keycj...@cam.ac.uk writes:
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
...
If you can suggest which is the
preferred
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/10 22:06, Anonymous wrote:
UNIQUENAME = ap${APACHE_VERSION}-${PORTNAME}
and selecting MP4 in www/mod_musicindex it still thinks WITH_MP4 is not
defined.
I haven't tried this, but thats a much better attempt then the py- version.
-
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:36AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
Yeah, but I had to look it up myself.
Do you know of any other examples that are missing either CONFLICTS or
NO_LATEST_LINK?
mcl
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:36AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
Yeah, but I had to look it up myself.
Do you know of any other examples that are missing either CONFLICTS or
NO_LATEST_LINK?
if
USE_APACHE=13
you can write ap13 you know what APACHE_VERSION will evaluate too.
Its only vague in the case of a '+'
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci
Hey,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:25:03 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote:
Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
a la daemontools.
That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to
actually do
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 00:40:43 +0200, Olivier Girard (neuf) wrote:
got no spare time to work on sympa actualy. My boss as decided that
this is not an issue for us and prefer me to work on other projects.
Maybe later this summer when i'm out of office but i really don't
know.
Olivier has
Dear all,
This is now under active development again. The new website is
http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home. Could someone be kind enough as
to update this port?
Best,
Quyen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
50 matches
Mail list logo
