So, is it port trouble?
--
Best regards,
Antonio Kless,
http://kless.spb.ru/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
I saw the update of pidgin so I wanted to upgrade but it fails :
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/net-im/libpurple
=== Starting check for build dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for net-im/libpurple from ports
=== Starting dependency check
=== Dependency check complete for
Hello,
I personally think that categories like french, japanese, arabic,
etc... are not the best way to write a language dependant port. Now,
there is no many languages categories in the ports tree but we can
plan that in the future more directories for the new future languages
dependant port can
Hello.
It's been a while since vulnerabilities have been discovered in tomcat
5.5.28, which is the version in ports.
5.5.30 has been out for a couple of weeks.
Any plant to upgrade?
Or should we move to 6.0?
bye Thanks
av.
___
On 20 July 2010 18:26, Oliver Schonrock oli...@schonrocks.com wrote:
On Tuesday 20 Jul 2010 00:14:47 Chris Rees wrote:
I'll have a look on Thursday for you.
that's great, thanks chris.
Done!
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148923
Bear in mind this is replacing sympa, not sympa5.
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: zynaddsubfx-2.2.1_8: no entry for /usr/ports/textproc/mini-xml
Committers on the hook:
jsa kwm olgeni wxs
Most recent CVS update was:
U MOVED
U audio/aqualung/Makefile
U
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:58:39PM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: zynaddsubfx-2.2.1_8: no entry for /usr/ports/textproc/mini-xml
Committers on the hook:
jsa kwm olgeni
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 12:01:06 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
=== Patching for libpurple-2.7.2
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for libpurple-2.7.2
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libpurple/protocols/oscar/oscar.c.rej
= Patch
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 00:38:17 -0400, jhell wrote:
I guess I should have made it more clear.
+===+
| This happened?: 2010/05/12 12:13:06 |
The above date corresponds to the last commit in lang/python26 at the
time of the repocopy to lang/python27.
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 10:29:19 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 12:01:06 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
=== Patching for libpurple-2.7.2
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for libpurple-2.7.2
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
Trying to build latest x11/gnome-screensaver and it's dependency
xscreensaver-gnome-hacks:
[r...@whitezone ~]# portmaster -b -d -w xscreensaver-gnome-hacks
=== Currently installed version: xscreensaver-gnome-hacks-5.10_2
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome-hacks
===
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:07 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build latest x11/gnome-screensaver and it's dependency
xscreensaver-gnome-hacks:
I fixed this a hour ago, please update your ports and try again.
-Koop
___
2010/7/25 Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 10:29:19 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 12:01:06 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
=== Â Patching for libpurple-2.7.2
=== Â Applying FreeBSD patches for libpurple-2.7.2
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed)
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Koop Mast k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:07 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build latest x11/gnome-screensaver and it's dependency
xscreensaver-gnome-hacks:
I fixed this a hour ago, please update your ports and try again.
-Koop
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, David DEMELIER wrote:
Hello,
I personally think that categories like french, japanese, arabic,
etc... are not the best way to write a language dependant port. Now,
there is no many languages categories in the ports tree but we can
plan that in the future more directories
On 22/07/2010 11:11, Alex Dupre wrote:
Christopher Key ha scritto:
At present, the interaction between portconf and port options is
somewhat confusing.
It's not completely clear to me if you are referring to my portconf
port. If so, the interaction is really simple: portconf is
17 matches
Mail list logo