I am doing my weekly run of portmaster to upgrade ports on my server:
FreeBSD quarto.lib.uchicago.edu 7.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p3
#0: Sat Sep 25 15:46:29 CDT 2010
r...@quarto.lib.uchicago.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I updated my ports tree two days ago (Friday, Oct 29) via
Hi,
I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
PORTMASTER 3.1.
It is written to do :
# pkg_delete -f portmaster*
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make clean make install clean
But when I type the first one, I got the message :
pkg_delete: No match.
Portmaster
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Peggy Wilkins enli...@gmail.com wrote:
I am doing my weekly run of portmaster to upgrade ports on my server:
FreeBSD quarto.lib.uchicago.edu 7.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p3
#0: Sat Sep 25 15:46:29 CDT 2010
On Sun 2010-10-31 17:57:52 UTC+0100, Alexandre (axel...@ymail.com) wrote:
I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
PORTMASTER 3.1.
It is written to do :
# pkg_delete -f portmaster*
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make clean make install clean
But
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:57 +0100, Alexandre wrote:
I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
PORTMASTER 3.1.
It is written to do :
# pkg_delete -f portmaster*
The wildcard ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_character ) is
interpreted by your shell and
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 05:57:52PM +0100, Alexandre wrote:
Hi,
I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
PORTMASTER 3.1.
It is written to do :
# pkg_delete -f portmaster*
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make clean make install clean
But when I type
Op 31-10-2010 17:57, Alexandre schreef:
Hi,
I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
PORTMASTER 3.1.
It is written to do :
# pkg_delete -f portmaster*
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make clean make install clean
But when I type the first one, I
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Alexandre axel...@ymail.com wrote:
I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
PORTMASTER 3.1.
It is written to do :
# pkg_delete -f portmaster*
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make clean make install clean
But when I type
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 04:18 +1100, andrew clarke wrote:
UPDATING should probably be amended upstream to correct this...
Regards
Andrew
While I'm certainly no authority on the issue, I think that's the wrong
approach and generally (really not speaking about any specific case) -
people, or
on AMD64 Intel quad core Freebsd 7.2 p3
dns1# pkg_info |grep gcc
gcc-3.4.6_3,1 GNU Compiler Collection 3.4
gcc-4.2.5.20090325_5 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2
gcc-4.4.6.20101012 GNU Compiler Collection 4.4
gcc-4.5.2.20101028 GNU Compiler Collection 4.5
gccmakedep-1.0.2Create dependencies
On 31/10/2010 17:56, Freddie Cash wrote:
The correct command is: pkg_delete -xf portmaster
-x does name globbing internally to pkg_delete, and should be used
over any shell globbing (like *).
So dogmatic. '-x' is one alternative. A globbing expression is
another. Either can be useful,
On 31.10.2010 19:53 (UTC+1), David Southwell wrote:
on AMD64 Intel quad core Freebsd 7.2 p3
dns1# pkg_info |grep gcc
gcc-3.4.6_3,1 GNU Compiler Collection 3.4
gcc-4.2.5.20090325_5 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2
gcc-4.4.6.20101012 GNU Compiler Collection 4.4
gcc-4.5.2.20101028 GNU Compiler
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 31/10/2010 17:56, Freddie Cash wrote:
The correct command is: pkg_delete -xf portmaster
-x does name globbing internally to pkg_delete, and should be used
over any shell globbing (like *).
So
On 31.10.2010 19:53 (UTC+1), David Southwell wrote:
on AMD64 Intel quad core Freebsd 7.2 p3
dns1# pkg_info |grep gcc
gcc-3.4.6_3,1 GNU Compiler Collection 3.4
gcc-4.2.5.20090325_5 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2
gcc-4.4.6.20101012 GNU Compiler Collection 4.4
gcc-4.5.2.20101028 GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/31/10 09:57, Alexandre wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade
| PORTMASTER 3.1.
| It is written to do :
|
| # pkg_delete -f portmaster*
| But when I type the first one, I got the message :
|
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 14:59, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is why I mentioned the more safe alternative, which you
snipped out of your reply:
pkg_delete -xif portmaster
Note the extra i in the middle, which makes the pkg_delete call
interactive, showing the package name to
On Sun 2010-10-31 19:27:17 UTC+0100, Michal Varga (varga.mic...@gmail.com)
wrote:
UPDATING should probably be amended upstream to correct this...
Regards
Andrew
While I'm certainly no authority on the issue, I think that's the wrong
approach and generally (really not speaking about
17 matches
Mail list logo