I am trying to build all ports that I have installed in an i386 chroot
environment on an amd64 machine. All work except for sysutils/cdrtools.
I have installed an i386 system to some directory, mounted a devfs to
the devfs subdirectory, set MACHINE=i386 ; UNAME_p=i386 ; UNAME_m=i386
and
On 17/11/2010 15:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to expose you a new proposal for the framework option.
First the problem with the actual situation.
the option framework has some problems :
- for a given option we have two variable : WITH_OPT WITHOUT_OPT only
having to check one
On 17/11/2010 15:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to expose you a new proposal for the framework option.
First the problem with the actual situation.
the option framework has some problems :
- for a given option we have two variable : WITH_OPT WITHOUT_OPT only
having to check one
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:34:02PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
I am trying to build all ports that I have installed in an i386 chroot
environment on an amd64 machine. All work except for sysutils/cdrtools.
I have installed an i386 system to some directory, mounted a devfs to
the
Howdy. I hope this is the right place to send a port bug report, but my
apologies if not and I'll appreciate any redirection.
It looks to me like the nrpe2 port is partly ignoring the
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes directive in /etc/make.conf. It does look in the
right place during the dependencies
Howdy. I hope this is the right place to send a port bug report, but my
apologies if not and I'll appreciate any redirection.
It looks to me like the subversion port is ignoring the MOD_DAV_SVN
configuration setting, always behaving as if it's turned on even when
it's not (which is the
best to open a PR http://www.freebsd.org/support.html
if you have a patch, against current ports tree, then you are more
likely to get action. we all have day jobs.
suggested subject line: [PATCH] fix mod_dav_svn config args.
upload the patch, bump portrevision.
On 2/11/11 3:34 PM, Adam
On 02/11/2011 12:38, Michael Scheidell wrote:
suggested subject line: [PATCH] fix mod_dav_svn config args.
For ports PRs please mention the category/portname in the subject. That
way the auto-assigner can do its magic.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin'
In the case of this port, it explains to send the report directly to the
maintainer. (I did that about 4 days ago and haven't heard any reply). I
guess the answer is, when in doubt open a pr. Still, it's annoying to be
misled in another direction.
configure: error: no suitable apr found
===
