on 28/02/2011 00:41 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied
below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The problem seems to be with libtool. If I run a command like:
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 21:34, Ashish SHUKLA ash...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Marius,
Marius Nünnerich writes:
[...]
Ok, I applied the patch and reinstalled the port. I will leave it
running for a few days and report back. So far it's looking good.
Thank you very much! :)
OK, I had it
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied
below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is
included twice at some
b. f. wrote:
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied below)
saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now.
The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is included
twice at
the distinfo portion of my udiff should be removed from the patch i supplied
earlier for the DAQ port. Apparently the tarball got garbled slightly on
Sourceforge earlier and that's why the file size was off. We re-uploaded
and the file size and sha256 hash are back to being normal.
--
Dean
On 2011-Feb-27 20:50:03 +, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote:
Also reported by me for the ATI Radeon RV370 X300 SE and somebody
else for a differently branded card with the same chip.
Breaks my ATI Technologies Inc RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)] as well.
I have discovered that
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:26:12PM -0500, Dean Freeman wrote:
the distinfo portion of my udiff should be removed from the patch i supplied
earlier for the DAQ port. Apparently the tarball got garbled slightly on
Sourceforge earlier and that's why the file size was off. We re-uploaded
and the
Op 28-02-2011 23:31, ajtiM schreef:
Hi!
Today I tried to run portmaster -ad on FreeBSD 8.2 and I got:
portmaster -ad
=== Gathering distinfo list for installed ports
=== Starting check of installed ports for available updates
=== Launching child to update xz-5.0.0 to xz-5.0.1
=== Port
Thank you.
BTW: this problem exist more than one year.
Sent from my HTC Inspire™ 4G on ATT
- Reply message -
From: Rene Ladan r.c.la...@gmail.com
To: ajtiM lum...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: xz
Date: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 16:46
Op 28-02-2011 23:31, ajtiM schreef:
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:31:27PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
Than If I run:
portmaster -e xz-5.0.0
=== Warning: Ports with dependencies on xz-5.0.0:
k9copy-2.3.4_4
kde4-4.5.5_1
kdebase-4.5.5
kdenetwork-4.5.5_2
kdesdk-4.5.5_1
kdeutils-4.5.5_2
Hi,
Guys, I'm getting the same SIGBUS when running `gpg-agent --daemon` as
you discussed on cvs-ports@ list. I'm not sure about the fix, so I have
created the entry in gnupg bugtracker:
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1320
JFYI,
Yuri
___
On 2/28/2011 8:00 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Hi,
Guys, I'm getting the same SIGBUS when running `gpg-agent --daemon` as
you discussed on cvs-ports@ list. I'm not sure about the fix, so I have
created the entry in gnupg bugtracker:
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1320
Thanks, hopefully they
13 matches
Mail list logo
