On 2011-Jun-02 14:10:15 +0200, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and
nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree
but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p.
You might like to check out
On 2011-Jun-02 23:56:34 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, not trying to be rude here (honestly), but it is GPLv3, which
clearly is not popular with *BSD. Please don't act like licenses don't
matter.
I'm not saying licenses don't matter. You said hates which is not
true. And you
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jun-02 23:56:34 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, not trying to be rude here (honestly), but it is GPLv3, which
clearly is not popular with *BSD. Please don't act like licenses don't
matter.
I'm
Synopsis: x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based port of pango
State-Changed-From-To: suspended-closed
State-Changed-By: arundel
State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 3 10:48:52 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed by the update to version 1.28.3 [1].
[1]
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously, what maintenance? All someone has to do is build it. Okay,
maybe I'm oversimplifying it, but it can't be much more than that. I
don't expect bugfixes or added features, just a working binary.
Well, if it is that
Am 03.06.2011 09:59, schrieb Rugxulo:
As stated in the commit message, gpc was removed because it is a dead
project and no-one was interested in maintaining it. It's nothing to
do with GPLv3 - there are many GPLv3-licensed ports.
It's not dead, it still works, but it won't be updated
Am 03.06.2011 06:56, schrieb Rugxulo:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jun-01 17:23:37 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems somebody isn't very knowledgeable about GPC. :-(
...
the real deal: *BSD hates GPL, esp. GPLv3,
Peter Jeremy wrote:
You might like to check out
http://www.mavetju.org/unix/freebsd-mirrors/cvsup-stats-global.php
As well as:
http://www.roble.com/docs/cvsup-ports-rep
Roger Marquis
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Is it normal that /usr/ports/net/fping doesn't work correct if you have
WITH_IPV6=YES in /etc/make.conf?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 05:57:44PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
Is it normal that /usr/ports/net/fping doesn't work correct if you have
WITH_IPV6=YES in /etc/make.conf?
Port's Makefile has the following comment:
# IPv6 not enabled by default, as it does not work together with IPv4.
and looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
i've a brand new FreeBSD here and will install KDE4 from ports.
When i try:
portmaster devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4
snip:
- - -- Found Python executable: /usr/local/bin/python2.7
- - -- Found Python version: 2.7.1
- - -- Found Python
Hello,
The java/eclipse port seems to be broken for a while now :
=== Giving up on fetching files:
eclipse/com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.41.v200903070017.jar
eclipse/javax.servlet.jsp_2.0.0.v200806031607.jar
eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar
Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file
On 3 Jun 2011 19:36, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The java/eclipse port seems to be broken for a while now :
=== Giving up on fetching files:
eclipse/com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.41.v200903070017.jar
eclipse/javax.servlet.jsp_2.0.0.v200806031607.jar
On 03/06/2011 20:46, Chris Rees wrote:
On 3 Jun 2011 19:36, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com
mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The java/eclipse port seems to be broken for a while now :
=== Giving up on fetching files:
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
mv -f
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
I don't see any related commits to 8-STABLE, which commit are you
reffering
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of
I have a rather strange situation on a FreeBSD 8-stable/amd84 box
where nspluginwrapper coredumps whilst processing
npwrapper.libflashplayer.so if it sees IcedTeaPlugin.so first:
server% nspluginwrapper -v -l
List plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for
19 matches
Mail list logo
