Hi all,
On my drive to clear pkg-install scripts manually creating users etc I
came across devel/fossology which is marked BROKEN.
I've made a patch for the USERS= problem at [1], but I'm going to
recommend deprecating the port unless someone can step up to maintain
it...
Any takers?
Chris
Hi all,
The distfile for dns/dhid has changed [see pasted output at the end].
Since it also needs patching to use USERS rather than manually
creating them using pkg-install I've done the first part [1], but
someone now needs to investigate whether the distfile changes are
malicious or not.
Thank you! And if I need IPV6 I'll use /usr/ports/net/fping+ipv6.
IPv6 not enabled by default, as it does not work together with IPv4.
I think it better to put this to pkg-message.
2011/6/3 Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 05:57:44PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
Is
On 4 June 2011 02:23, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
I don't
Pavel Timofeev writes:
Thank you! And if I need IPV6 I'll use /usr/ports/net/fping+ipv6.
IPv6 not enabled by default, as it does not work together with IPv4.
I think it better to put this to pkg-message.
I would rather know this before actually building; perhaps
in pkg-descr
On Jun 4, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
Pavel Timofeev writes:
Thank you! And if I need IPV6 I'll use /usr/ports/net/fping+ipv6.
IPv6 not enabled by default, as it does not work together with IPv4.
I think it better to put this to pkg-message.
I would rather know this
Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com writes:
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
I guess it's a user error, utmpx.h and utmp.h shouldn't both be present.
See similar
Bjoern A. Zeeb writes:
I'd love to see someone just fixing it. It cannot be too hard.
Do we have a volunteer? :-)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
ports/157072 contains a shar for an experimental port of TrueCrypt 7.0a. I'm
interested in additional feedback on whether or not you run into any sorts of
issues. If you have a test machine available, please build the port, get fuse
running and do some testing.
Please be aware that since
On -10.01.-28163 14:59, Matthias Andree wrote:
Call it dying or undead then. That's usually not reason enough for
someone who does not _need_ the port (for something other than to put it
on display, that is) to invest time.
If it is not dead, it should not have been removed... (Temporary)
On 06/04/2011 15:07, Warren Block wrote:
On install, the ports system could show a warning:
This port will be removed from the ports tree on ${EXPIRE_DATE}.
Reasons: ${EXPIRE_REASONS}
That's basically what DEPRECATED + EXPIRATION_DATE does now.
The math on this is simple, there are
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
On my drive to clear pkg-install scripts manually creating users
etc I came across devel/fossology which is marked BROKEN.
I've made a patch for the USERS= problem at [1], but I'm going
to recommend deprecating the port unless someone can step up
On 04.06.2011 18:27, Doug Barton wrote:
The math on this is simple, there are maintainers willing to do the
work, or not.
It does not matter, whether there are any such maintainers, /if there is
no work to do/. Neither lang/gpc nor databases/db2 (for one more
example) required a maintainer at
On Jun 04, 2011, at 21:36 , Mikhail T. wrote:
On 04.06.2011 18:27, Doug Barton wrote:
The math on this is simple, there are maintainers willing to do the work, or
not.
It does not matter, whether there are any such maintainers, /if there is no
work to do/. Neither lang/gpc nor
14 matches
Mail list logo
