Hello.
Could someone look at ports/160313 ? It is a port for pg_reorg, which is
used to rebuild your PostgreSQL tables, for example, to eliminate table
bloat.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University
Le 8 août 2011 à 14:43, Clement Laforet a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Clement Laforet wrote:
Hi,
You can find a preliminary port of hadoop 0.20.203.0 here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~clement/hadoop/
Basic hive and pig ports are available here too.
Hello Clem,
The most resent update of the ports tree resulted in this failure:
[~] portmaster -dav
=== The value of DISTDIR cannot be empty
=== Aborting update
Minutes ago, I performed an update and everything was smooth. The
another portsnap seems to have killed something.
Oliver
O. Hartmann wrote on 01.09.2011 12:37:
The most resent update of the ports tree resulted in this failure:
[~] portmaster -dav
=== The value of DISTDIR cannot be empty
=== Aborting update
Minutes ago, I performed an update and everything was smooth. The
another portsnap seems to have killed
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:34:56AM +0200, Michal Varga wrote:
- While nobody probably cares much about that guy and his missing
browser images, what would you tell to the GIMP guy? That he should have
waited longer before upgrading the (for him, 30 levels deep) Foo
dependency? With furious
on 31/08/2011 20:08 Matthias Andree said the following:
If everyone cared to read not just the past three posts but what was
written earlier in this whole thread, and ceased adding to the
meaningless I've had no problems, that would help.
Just because someone hasn't tripped over the bugs
Alexander Pyhalov wrote on 01.09.2011 10:09:
Hello.
Could someone look at ports/160313 ? It is a port for pg_reorg, which is
used to rebuild your PostgreSQL tables, for example, to eliminate table
bloat.
Hi Alexander,
please consider patch attached. Major changes are:
- do not depend on
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:45:54 -0700
Roman Bogorodskiy articulated:
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
GnuTLS has been updated. URL:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/5243
I was wondering if there is any work being done on getting the new
version into the ports
On 1 September 2011 11:51, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:45:54 -0700
Roman Bogorodskiy articulated:
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
GnuTLS has been updated. URL:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/5243
I was wondering if there is any
Hi,
Suggestion: pkgdb is too cryptic even with -v,
it needs more explanation what it is up to
particularly what decisions it asks from user
(I started with 8.2-Release pkgdb then moved to current pkgdb,
some fragments of run examples below):
% pkgdb -F -v
Checking for
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Suggestion: pkgdb is too cryptic even with -v,
it needs more explanation what it is up to
particularly what decisions it asks from user
.
This is a point i have studied a long time, notably i have read the ruby
code doing that. There are a lot of heuristics
Hello,
On 09/01/2011 07:45 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
First of all, I'd prefer to wait some time and see what kind of
problems gnutls users have with the new branch since it's quite new
still, the first 3.0 release was just about one months ago.
This table [1] may be of help to foresee
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to deal with the conflict
between the ports libGL and nvidia-driver?
Both install their own version of /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1. Obviously,
if you're using the nvidia driver, you need nvidia's version and not
libGL's
Michel TALON writes:
Finally
the file UPDATING should be forcefully removed from the system
While I support all reasonable efforts to get automation to
always Do The Right Thing(tm), my reaction to this is: absolutely
not.
Until you can show there are no, and will never
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:45:41 +0200 (CEST)
Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to deal with the conflict
between the ports libGL and nvidia-driver?
Both install their own version of /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1.
Hi all,
I've been boring people on IRC with this and perhaps I need to widen
participation to get some opinions.
What do people think of this?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/SimplifyingMkIncludes
tl;dr -- bsd.port.mk is too big, Mk/ directory is cluttered,
.including files from ${PORTSDIR}/Mk in
On 1 September 2011 17:12, Eygene Ryabinkin r...@freebsd.org wrote:
Chris, good day.
Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:32:43PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
I'm having a look at modifying INDEX to have a field at the end (to
cause minimum breakage), but I've discovered that in a few ports there
(6630 out
Chris, good day.
Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:32:43PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
I'm having a look at modifying INDEX to have a field at the end (to
cause minimum breakage), but I've discovered that in a few ports there
(6630 out of 22731) appears to be extra 'stuff' in fields past field
10 (which
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 04:23 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:34:56AM +0200, Michal Varga wrote:
- While nobody probably cares much about that guy and his missing
browser images, what would you tell to the GIMP guy? That he should have
waited longer before upgrading the
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:47:40 +0200
Michal Varga wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 04:23 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
In that case, you should not be updating that rapidly.
I've covered that aspect earlier in the discussion. There is no option
to 'upgrade less rapidly', as at any single point in
Michal,
Nice analogy !
Nobody is really steering this ship anymore and it just happily
rams icebergs along the way, with volunteers occasionally throwing
buckets of water (and sometimes pieces of furniture) overboard to
somehow keep it afloat for a while longer.
Furniture like
Hello.
Thanks for your patch. This port now looks better and works with 8.4.
On 09/01/2011 14:48, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Alexander Pyhalov wrote on 01.09.2011 10:09:
Hello.
Could someone look at ports/160313 ? It is a port for pg_reorg, which is
used to rebuild your PostgreSQL tables, for
22 matches
Mail list logo
