hi mates,
I get build-failures while i try to update the following ports, with
the help of portmaster:
* devel/glib20
config.status: executing glib/glibconfig.h commands
config.status: executing chmod-scripts commands
=== Building for glib-2.28.8_2
make all-recursive
make: illegal
* Martin Wilke (m...@freebsd.org) wrote:
They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything about those,
that
is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The not used anymore mean not
used in
Why should we go through it again and again? If it's not broken, it's
useable, you
Hi,
I've noticed that the mysql-gui-tools port has been removed. A few months ago
I had found a way to fix the build (in fact, change one line in an include
file somewhere) but was unsure if it would work with other mysql versions than
the one I'm using.
Is it possible to bring back the port
Le 11.11.2011 11:07, Dmitry Marakasov a écrit :
Why don't we take out Gnome and KDE then? I don't use it.
Cause, there is still guys that are ready to maintain them, and,
futhermore, some stuff in the ports tree that depend on them ?
--
David Marec, mailto:david.ma...@davenulle.org
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Benny Goemans
benny.goem...@belgacom.net wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that the mysql-gui-tools port has been removed. A few months ago
I had found a way to fix the build (in fact, change one line in an include
file somewhere) but was unsure if it would work
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400
Dmitry Marakasov articulated:
* Martin Wilke (m...@freebsd.org) wrote:
They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything
about those, that is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The
not used anymore mean not used in
Why should we go
On 11 November 2011 13:09, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400
Dmitry Marakasov articulated:
* Martin Wilke (m...@freebsd.org) wrote:
They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything
about those, that is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status.
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:07:08 +0400
Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru mentioned:
* Martin Wilke (m...@freebsd.org) wrote:
They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything about
those, that
is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The not used anymore mean not
used in
Why don't we take out Gnome and KDE then? I don't use it.
It's this kind of comment that is souring me on the FreeBSD community.
Can't we just disagree politely anymore?
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:40:12PM -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Because portmgr@ is using it? There're numerous cases when unmaintained,
buggy,
vulnerable and plainly dangerous stuff stays in tree because someone in
portmgr
gang likes it when other applications not used by them being
On 11/10/2011 03:06, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org) wrote:
They have been deprecated for a while and noone said anything about those,
that
is the purpose of the DEPRECATED status. The not used anymore mean not
used in
Why should we go through it again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(I just picked one message to do a reply-all, not specific to any one
single message but all of them).
Technically speaking the current approach's problem is that the user
might have no chance of seeing it before the port is removed. By its
On 11/11/2011 14:15, Xin LI wrote:
(I just picked one message to do a reply-all, not specific to any one
single message but all of them).
Technically speaking the current approach's problem is that the user
might have no chance of seeing it before the port is removed.
That's going to be
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't look like the Porter's Handbook has a section on
re-animating dead ports.
Not yet.
But you could always submit it as a new port (with your fix included):
This is the important part. You need to fix the
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0100, Benny Goemans wrote:
Is it possible to bring back the port so I can submit that change so that at
least some people can use it again?
I've just added a section to our Committer's Guide, since it seems
something that many people don't understand how to
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0100, Benny Goemans wrote:
Is it possible to bring back the port so I can submit that change so that at
least some people can use it again?
I've just added a section to our Committer's Guide, since it seems
On 11/11/2011 20:28, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0100, Benny Goemans wrote:
Is it possible to bring back the port so I can submit that change so
that at
least some people can use it again?
I've just added a section to
I'm running r227447 and get the following:
cc -O2 -pipe -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX
-DRT_WITH_VBOX -w -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS
-DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
-nostdinc -Iinclude -I. -Ir0drv -I. -I@
18 matches
Mail list logo
