As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
We use a bunch of HP and Xerox printers across our network, all capable
of being accessed via network over IPP protocoall (so they claim).
Printing worked for me flawless on FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE, 9.0-CURRENT, now
9.0-STABLE on all boxes in question. Since updating cups to revision
1.5.0 (this is
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:53:55 +1100, richo wrote
Hi Richo,
Did you get a chance to look at this?
Yes, sorry, I did not get back to you. This has been part of the 4.2.0
libdvdnav/libdvdread update, see :
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/multimedia/libdvdread/Makefile#rev1.40
I have
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: xapian-omega10-1.0.22: no entry for
/usr/ports/databases/xapian-core10
make_index: xapian-omega10-1.0.22: no entry for
/usr/ports/databases/xapian-core10
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
I would like to ask you to review and test the port in this PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164843
I also would to discuss with the port's users the best approach to updating it.
Thank you.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On 02/07/12 18:40, O. Hartmann wrote:
We use a bunch of HP and Xerox printers across our network, all capable
of being accessed via network over IPP protocoall (so they claim).
Printing worked for me flawless on FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE, 9.0-CURRENT, now
9.0-STABLE on all boxes in question. Since
On 07.02.2012 02:18, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for starting to work on it! I've added a link from
WantedPorts
to that
mail.
Currently stuck on the absence of xlocale(3). Is there any chance
these
get MFC'd to RELENG_9 and RELENG_8? Or should I try implementing them
in
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
Committers on the hook:
bapt bf blackend crees dhn dinoex dougb eadler ehaupt flo glewis gordon miwi
pav pgollucci
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is undefined
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf exists
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf contains a line beginning with 'purgestat'
- POSTFIX_DEFAULT_MTA is unset
And that one seems the
On 07.02.2012 02:18, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for starting to work on it! I've added a link from
WantedPorts
to that
mail.
Currently stuck on the absence of xlocale(3). Is there any chance
these
get MFC'd to RELENG_9 and RELENG_8? Or should I try implementing them
in
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
Committers on the hook:
bapt bf blackend crees dhn dinoex dougb eadler ehaupt erwin flo glewis gordon
miwi pav
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
make_index: blocksshd-1.3: no entry for /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-Subnets
Committers on the hook:
bapt bf blackend crees dhn
On 7 February 2012 19:40, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
make_index: vindaloo-0.2_6: no entry for /usr/ports
make_index: blocksshd-1.3: no entry for
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is undefined
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf exists
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf contains a line beginning with 'purgestat'
-
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is undefined
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf exists
-
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is undefined
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf exists
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf contains a line beginning with 'purgestat'
-
On 7 February 2012 02:04, Sahil Tandon sahil+freebsd-po...@tandon.net wrote:
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is undefined
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf exists
- /etc/mail/mailer.conf contains a line beginning
On 2012-02-06 01:57, Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
This section:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-php.html
is out of date, as the very first bit mentions a bunch of old apache
stuff. I'm happy to help update it if someone can say authoritatively
what
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hello
Is there any port that I can compile Kamailio 3.2.2 ?
Could you send me Kamailio port Makefile please ?
Regards
Serhat AKCA
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On 02/07/2012 13:18, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is
2012/2/7 lini...@freebsd.org:
The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled
for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before
that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR),
the ports will be deleted.
portname: lang/php52
On 02/07/2012 02:49, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I would like to ask you to review and test the port in this PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164843
Using the latest shar on up to date 8-stable i386 it seems to run fine.
FWIW I'm using the port with all of the OPTIONS UNchecked.
A
any GOOD way to do this without spawing a shell?
SVN_PORTVERSION!=cd ${SVN_PORTDIR} ${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION
by looking for this, its a pretty common thing: I played around for 2
hours and gave up.
grep -R -- 'MAKE. -V PORT' /usr/ports
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port # must bump portversion
in port... where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
this?
Take a look at editors/xxe and
On 2/7/12 8:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port # must bump portversion
in port... where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
On 02/07/2012 17:50, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port # must bump portversion
in port... where you
On 02/07/2012 17:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 2/7/12 8:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port # must bump portversion
in port... where you
On 02/08/12 01:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 2/7/12 8:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port # must bump portversion
in port... where you
On 2/7/12 8:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
ok, but I said these are two maintainers,
Before I maintained either they were both maintained by 2 different
people. :)
Well yeah, but so what? Most people who maintain ports are
cooperative/friendly and are willing to listen to reasoned arguments
about
On 02/07/2012 18:07, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 2/7/12 8:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
ok, but I said these are two maintainers,
Before I maintained either they were both maintained by 2 different
people. :)
Well yeah, but so what? Most people who maintain ports are
cooperative/friendly
On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port # must bump portversion
in port... where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
On 02/07/2012 14:09, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-02-06 01:57, Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
This section:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-php.html
is out of date, as the very first bit mentions a bunch of old apache
stuff. I'm happy to help update it if
On 2/7/12 9:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
No. Please actually LOOK CAREFULLY at the example I gave you. It does
the right thing.
you mean talk to lev (maintainer of ../subversion16) and ask for a
Makefile.inc, right?
so his Makefile.common will call his Makefile.inc and my Makefile will
On 02/07/2012 18:30, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 2/7/12 9:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
No. Please actually LOOK CAREFULLY at the example I gave you. It does
the right thing.
you mean talk to lev (maintainer of ../subversion16) and ask for a
Makefile.inc, right?
so his Makefile.common will
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 12:27:31 -0900, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
mail/postfix and its derivatives are interactive when ALL of the
following conditions are true:
- PACKAGE_BUILDING is undefined - /etc/mail/mailer.conf exists -
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: graphics/vrml2pov
description:Convert VRML files to POVRay source
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: unfetchable
This seems to be a ports-infrastructure problem, rather than a
problem in
On 02/08/2012 02:12, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: graphics/vrml2pov
description:Convert VRML files to POVRay source
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: unfetchable
This seems to be a
Makes sense to me.
I might even see about doing the nitty gritty.
On 02/08/12 03:28, Doug Barton wrote:
Following up to my previous post about Why isn't WWWDIR_REL in the
default PLIST_SUB I broke open bsd.port.mk and found this:
PLIST_SUB+= DOCSDIR=${DOCSDIR_REL} \
Hello.
On 02/07/2012 12:29, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: databases/p5-postgresql-plperl
description:Write SQL functions for PostgreSQL using Perl5
maintainer:p...@freebsd.org
deprecated because: No longer supported by upstream-- upgrade to later
On 02/08/2012 10:10, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:41:04AM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
On 02/07/2012 12:29, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: databases/p5-postgresql-plperl
description:Write SQL functions for PostgreSQL using Perl5
On 8 Feb 2012 06:26, Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru wrote:
On 02/08/2012 10:10, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:41:04AM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
On 02/07/2012 12:29, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: databases/p5-postgresql-plperl
description:
45 matches
Mail list logo
