[ GSOC ] Project: Parallelization in the ports collection

Hello Community. My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC student at The FreeBSD Project. My project is "Parallelization in the ports collection and pkgng utility" I have created wiki page where I described problems that I have to solve and approaches to solving this problems. ( http://wiki.free

Re: Wbar not displaying correctly

Hello, For "Problem load font file" it's a problem with you conf. Run wbar-config. Go into "Preferences" and choose your font. Usually : /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans Le 09.05.2012 13:41, Leslie Jensen a écrit : I've upgraded one system from 8.2-RELEASE to 8.3-RELEASE. Rebuild

Re: WITH_GCC

On Wed, 16 May 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> +CFLAGS+= ${CFLAGS.${CC}} >>> +CXXFLAGS+= ${CXXFLAGS.${CC}} >> >> Similarly here. Where does this come from, why is it related to >> the WITH_GCC versus USE_GCC patch? Can and should this be split >> out? How is it used and where?

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:47:18 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Janos Dohanics writes: > > > On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:26:25 -0300 > > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > >> Can you check it has the SIPFILES option enabled and that you have > >> /usr/local/share/py-sip/QtScript/QtScriptmod.sip on yo

Re: category for new port databases/freexl

On Sun, 20 May 2012 13:16:05 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > > new port: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/168131 > > > > submitter suggests: > > > > CATEGORIES= databases geography > > > > but: > > COMMENT=Library to extract valid data from within an Excel (.xls) > > spreadshe

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

Janos Dohanics writes: > On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:26:25 -0300 > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> Can you check it has the SIPFILES option enabled and that you have >> /usr/local/share/py-sip/QtScript/QtScriptmod.sip on your system? Could >> you also post the build output with CMAKE_VERBOSE _and_ pa

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:26:25 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Janos Dohanics writes: > > > On Sun, 20 May 2012 12:08:13 -0300 > > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > >> Before marking another port as MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE, I'd really like to > >> know what error you were experiencing. > >> > >> Can

Re: category for new port databases/freexl

> new port: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/168131 > > submitter suggests: > > CATEGORIES= databases geography > > but: > COMMENT= Library to extract valid data from within an Excel (.xls) > spreadsheet > > > am I right in that this just needs to be: > > CATEGORIES= text

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

Op zo 20 mei 2012 15:39:37 schreef Michael Scheidell: > On 5/20/12 3:34 PM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > > I think you don't want 1.0.0.b, since the .b will signify a beta and > > 1.0.0> 1.0.0.b. That doesn't look like how upstream means it to be. > > better than 1.0.0b. > because, 1.0.1 will be >

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 5/20/12 3:34 PM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: I think you don't want 1.0.0.b, since the .b will signify a beta and 1.0.0> 1.0.0.b. That doesn't look like how upstream means it to be. better than 1.0.0b. because, 1.0.1 will be > 1.0.0.b http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porte

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

Op zo 20 mei 2012 15:28:40 schreef Michael Scheidell: > On 5/20/12 3:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > >> any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in > >> why > >> > >> > '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'? > > > > Because as much as possible, we try to standardise things

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 5/20/12 3:30 PM, Chris Rees wrote: Docs patches would be great; you know full well that most of this stuff isn't documented;) gota figure out svn now.. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell ___

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 20 May 2012 20:28, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 5/20/12 3:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >>> >>> any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in >>> why >>> >  '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'? >> >> Because as much as possible, we try to standardise things like versi

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 5/20/12 3:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in why > '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'? Because as much as possible, we try to standardise things like version numbers and rc scripts, so people get a more consistent experience,

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 20 May 2012 20:19, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 5/20/12 3:18 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> Try setting DISTVERSION=1.0.0b and let the ports generate PORTVERSION >> make -V PORTVERSION >> 1.0.0.b >> >> ok, like that? >> > any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 5/20/12 3:18 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: Try setting DISTVERSION=1.0.0b and let the ports generate PORTVERSION make -V PORTVERSION 1.0.0.b ok, like that? any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in why '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'? -- Michael Scheid

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 5/20/12 10:36 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 20/05/2012 14:41, Michael Scheidell wrote: I seem to remember some discussion on using numeric only, and not alpha in PORTVERSION string, and would like to address this with maintainer unless its just my faulty memory mixing up PORTVERSION/REVISION

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

Janos Dohanics writes: > On Sun, 20 May 2012 12:08:13 -0300 > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> Before marking another port as MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE, I'd really like to >> know what error you were experiencing. >> >> Can you please build only with CMAKE_VERBOSE=1 and post the log so we >> can find out

Re: Procfs in Jail on fresh install of openjdk6

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:22:31AM +0200, Horst Leitenmueller wrote: > hi Greg, > > i have a question regarding the hint that procfs must be enabled on openjdk6 > > if this is already mounted before installation of openjdk6 the build fails > with: > > gmake[2]: Entering directory > `/s/portbu

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

On Sun, 20 May 2012 12:08:13 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Janos Dohanics writes: > > > On Sat, 19 May 2012 23:17:09 + > > Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 14:44:41 -0400, Janos Dohanics wrote: > >> > In the end though, building py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 still

Dikembe Mutombo Foundation, Inc.

Bien-aimés, Que la Paix du Seigneur soit avec vous. Je suis Mutombo Dikembe et je suis anime par la volonte de Dieu avous assister financierement. Je priais a Dieu pour savoir a qui et ou je devrais faire ce gestede bonnefoi,avant que ce quelqu'un me dise de vos bonnes activites,et dans mon e

Re: Redmine update

2012/5/20 Radim Kolar : >> If you really want to improve the situation have a look at ChiliProject >> because they actually care about that. So better create a port for that. > > Yes, i have better experience with chili project too. Its far easier to get > it running due compatibility with other ru

Re: Redmine update

> If you really want to improve the situation have a look at ChiliProject because they actually care about that. So better create a port for that. Yes, i have better experience with chili project too. Its far easier to get it running due compatibility with other ruby stuff. __

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

Janos Dohanics writes: > On Sat, 19 May 2012 23:17:09 + > Max Brazhnikov wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 14:44:41 -0400, Janos Dohanics wrote: >> > In the end though, building py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 still ends >> > with an error: >> >> to see actual error you need to run 'make DISABL

Re: py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 build error

On Sat, 19 May 2012 23:17:09 + Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2012 14:44:41 -0400, Janos Dohanics wrote: > > In the end though, building py27-kdebindings-pykde4-4.7.2 still ends > > with an error: > > to see actual error you need to run 'make DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=1 > CMAKE_VERBOSE=1' T

Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

On 20/05/2012 14:41, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I seem to remember some discussion on using numeric only, and not alpha > in PORTVERSION string, and would like to address this with maintainer > unless its just my faulty memory mixing up PORTVERSION/REVISION. > > only thing I found ~seems~ to indic

Re: Redmine update

On So., 20. Mai. 2012 16:02:04 CEST, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: > 2012/5/19 Nicolas Raspail : > > Hello > > > > I see that there is a pr (ports/166087) to update Redmine from 1.3.1 to > > 1.3.2 that have been updated on Sat May 5 2012. > > > > Now, there is two stable Redmine versions, 1.4.2 and

INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Redmine update

2012/5/19 Nicolas Raspail : > Hello > > I see that there is a pr (ports/166087) to update Redmine from 1.3.1 to > 1.3.2 that have been updated on Sat May 5 2012. > > Now, there is two stable Redmine versions, 1.4.2 and 2.0.0, that are > compatible with ruby 1.9 and Rubygem 1.8. > > Is someone worki

category for new port databases/freexl

new port: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/168131 submitter suggests: CATEGORIES= databases geography but: COMMENT=Library to extract valid data from within an Excel (.xls) spreadsheet am I right in that this just needs to be: CATEGORIES= textproc -- Michae

PORTVERSION=1.0.0b

I seem to remember some discussion on using numeric only, and not alpha in PORTVERSION string, and would like to address this with maintainer unless its just my faulty memory mixing up PORTVERSION/REVISION. only thing I found ~seems~ to indicate using alpha is ok:

Re: WITH_GCC

On 20 May 2012 06:18, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> >>> P.S. >>> Perhaps this information should also be somewhere in the Porter's >>> Handbook. >> >> >> It is scattered around in it: >> >> WITH

Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x

Erwin Lansing wrote on 20.05.2012 14:27: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: py27-Products.PloneLDAP-1.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/py-Products.LDAPMultiPlugins make_index: py27-Products.PloneLDAP-1.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/py-Product

INDEX build failed for 7.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: py27-Products.PloneLDAP-1.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/py-Products.LDAPMultiPlugins make_index: py27-Products.PloneLDAP-1.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/py-Products.LDAPUserFolder Committers on the hook: a

Re: x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics

On 18/05/2012 15:18, Oliver Pinter wrote: Hi! Please apply the attached patch to x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics/Makefile. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any