On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:58:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2012 15:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Can you try with this patch ?
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/bsd.options.mk.diff
Still adding NO_OPTIONS_SORT=yes
With this
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:42:33AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2012-06-04 18:58, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
following error
javaPathHelper: not found
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:26:10PM +0200, Florent wrote:
On 31.05.2012 11:36, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Help Please!
Thanks
---
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
For more help with
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:13:56AM +0200, coder.tuxfamily wrote:
Le 05.06.2012 05:48, Heino Tiedemann a écrit :
Leslie Jensenles...@eskk.nu wrote:
---
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
2012-06-05 08:09, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:42:33AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2012-06-04 18:58, Baptiste Daroussin skrev:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I have just installed libreoffice-3.5.2_4 and are now getting the
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have the same problem but i can pass it except for tail_build. My
options :
GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe tested also with GTK2)
JAVA
MMEDIA
PGSQL
SVG
The problem is that none of the reports here
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have the same problem but i can pass it except for tail_build. My
options :
GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe tested also with GTK2)
JAVA
MMEDIA
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I'm not sure it's a good idea.
Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads and
fork. That is fork in ruby 1.9 hangs sometimes...
The ONLY thing I can find
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
I'm having this same problem, if you need a full log here you can find
it:
http://www.madpilot.net/~mad/typescript.xz
Compressing it with xz reduced
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I'm not sure it's a good idea.
Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads and
fork. That is fork in
Hello.
I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
and pkg_jail.
When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
permissions of the directories created by the ports which already exist.
Old pkg_add did not have this behavior.
For
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:04:33AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Actually, the problem I'm trying to debug right now is more weird.
When I run mono via system(3) from the ruby 1.9 process (I mean,
exactly system(3), not via some ruby wrapper) twice, it hangs on some
umtx the second time. This
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:04:33AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I'm not sure it's a good idea.
Ruby 1.9 still has some
Le 05/06/2012 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
Hello.
I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
and pkg_jail.
When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
permissions
On 6/5/12 3:00 AM, Sulev-Madis 'ketas' Silber wrote:
HTML version of this report is
here:http://ketas.si.pri.ee/ports-conflicts/po...@freebsd.org
For port accessibility/kdeaccessibility suggesting new CONFLICTS jovie-[0-9]*
kdeartwork-[0-9]* kmag-[0-9]* kmousetool-[0-9]* kmouth-[0-9]*
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Romain Tartière wrote:
I used to see the mono process in the STOP state
oops: read pause state!
^T:
load: 0.07 cmd: mono 46160 [pause] 4854.59r 165.68u 18.57s 0% 169264k
ps l 46160:
UID PID PPID CPU PRI NIVSZRSS MWCHAN STAT TT TIME
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
Hello.
I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
and pkg_jail.
When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
permissions of the directories
Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/04/2012 04:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Yes, that's right. But I am confused why portmaster does not show the
options dialog to let user uncheck QT4?
There is code to do this if you use the --force-config option. I haven't
made that the default yet because it's a
Well, I admit that this short summary was little too big. Bigger than
the another report that regularly ends up in ports@
Maybe big maintainer groups need different approach to this. And this
needs more refinement. I let things settle for a while and tell few
weeks later what is left.
With more
Hi all,
The work will now begin to have a very long due feature in the ports tree.
Every sane package system are working with a stage directory support, this is
almost mandatory to have something clean.
That allows you to :
- be able to process anything but installation as a user (long
term
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I'm not sure it's a good idea.
Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads
and
fork. That is fork in
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
Is this deliberate? If so, why?
And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
05.06.2012 17:53, Robert Huff написал:
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
Is this deliberate? If so, why?
And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
That should give you the maintainer:
-
% make -C
* Robert Huff [Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:53:37 -0400]:
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
Is this deliberate? If so, why?
And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
In the ports directory type
make maintainer
FWIW, resulting package is only
$ du -h libreoffice-3.5.2_4.tbz
94Mlibreoffice-3.5.2_4.tbz
So if somebody would like to host it, let me know.
Mind, that it's -march=native amd64 build, so
you will unfortunately need Intel Core 2 Penryn
(they added SSE 4.1
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
* Robert Huff [Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:53:37 -0400]:
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
Is this deliberate? If so, why?
And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
In the ports directory type
make maintainer
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
I'm having this same problem, if you need a full log here you can find
it:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
Robert Huff
Well it is disabled by default the parallel build you see is enable natively by
their
Theoretically LibreOffice already has
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes
in port's Makefile, but it's internally
still parallelizing, correct?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/make-failed-for-editors-libreoffice-tp5713591p5715337.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Helfman skrev:
* Robert Huff [Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:53:37 -0400]:
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line. Is this deliberate? If so,
why? And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
In the ports
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:32:53PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would
like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which
does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr.
I would like to get feedback on
When will the patch and extension be available for 5.4? Any idea?
--
Paul Schmehl (pa...@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/infosecurity/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:03:20AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
Theoretically LibreOffice already has
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes
in port's Makefile, but it's internally
still parallelizing, correct?
Correct
regards,
Bapt
pgpc67zRP2Ecn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
Robert Huff
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:55:55PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with a port I am currently maintaining. This is
the log from pointyhat:
erwin@freefall:cad/openvsp make fetch
=== License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
/usr/bin/fetch -o /home/erwin/tmp/OpenVSP_2.0_Community.tar.gz
Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
OPTIONS_MULTI= ENCODER
OPTIONS_MULTI_ENCODER= LAME VORBIS FLAC
OPTIONS_MULTI= ENGINE
OPTIONS_MULTI_ENGINE= MPLAYER XINE
You are overwriting OPTIONS_MULTI. To append, use += , e.g.
OPTIONS_MULTI= ENCODER
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have the same problem but i can pass it except for tail_build. My
options :
GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
Robert Huff
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:43:55 -0400
Steve Wills swi...@mouf.net mentioned:
Is this perhaps the -pthread issue I hit with perl? The issue is that if
you call (dlopen, exec, whatever) a threaded app from a non-threaded on,
it hangs due to the fact that libc takes shortcuts and doesn't
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:42:09 +0200
Romain Tartière rom...@freebsd.org mentioned:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:04:33AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Actually, the problem I'm trying to debug right now is more weird.
When I run mono via system(3) from the ruby 1.9 process (I mean,
exactly
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Sounds similar. Unfortunately, my app is proprietary. I'll try to
prepare some smaller test case today.
Thanks! In the meantime, I am trying to run Banshee with this in
/etc/libmap.conf:
| [/usr/local/bin/mono]
| libthr.so.3
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:08:36 +0200
Romain Tartière rom...@freebsd.org mentioned:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Sounds similar. Unfortunately, my app is proprietary. I'll try to
prepare some smaller test case today.
Thanks! In the meantime, I am trying
[ PLEASE don't top-post, ktnx ]
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:29:58 +0300
Sulev-Madis Silber madis...@hot.ee wrote:
Well, I admit that this short summary was little too big. Bigger than
the another report that regularly ends up in ports@
Maybe big maintainer groups need different approach to
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:18:06AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Why do you need this? libpthread.so is exactly libthr right now.
meh. I remembered some threading juggling with libpthread / libthr and
since ldd reported libthr.so I was wondering if the problem was not back
and switching to the
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:56:51 +0800
Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:41:05 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote:
Last time I tested, yes, that was one of the problems.
Current beta from skype is at .99, you could give it a try, but I
don't expect
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php distro
again, so now I need to find out what the consequences are of not including
it. Googling..
--On June 5, 2012 11:47:04 AM -0500 Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
When will the patch and extension be
--On June 5, 2012 2:27:12 PM -0500 Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:50:56 -0500, Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php
distro again, so now I need to find out what the consequences are of not
Paul Schmehl wrote on 06.06.2012 00:21:
--On June 5, 2012 2:27:12 PM -0500 Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:50:56 -0500, Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php
distro again, so now I need to find
I inferred that you meant distribution == part of the core PHP project.
Yes, it has been distributed alongside PHP on many different operating
systems.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 6/5/12 4:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
It was never included in the PHP distribution.
php distribution, as in php.net
your example was for a FreeBSD port.
Yes, our ports are a lot more functional and safe than distribution,
more options, easier to use..
But the world doesn't have the
For one thing, skimming casually I see mostly
kde related ports conflicting with other kde ones
which I presume are false positives, removing
them from list would make it appear more
meaningful.
--
View this message in context:
I am still running portmaster-Rr png- on FreeBSD 9.0 Release.
I ahd some problems, some I saved, some I saved with your help, some
applications I just uninstalled because I don't have enough time. Now I
stak with kdebinding4-perl-perlqt:
[ 21%] Building CXX object
On 06/05/12 14:00, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
You usually cannot dlopen the object linked agains pthread from a
non-pthreaded object. Or it is used to be that way.
My understanding is that you can now, IFF your non-threaded object is
built with -pthread.
Exec should work
fine, I don't see how
Em Ter, 2012-06-05 às 19:35 +0200, Heino Tiedemann escreveu:
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
in the Makefile
near
Hello all...
finally I track down the problem with libreoffice,
the problem is with the boost headers and files
You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
Solution:
remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
lenzi.ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all...
finally I track down the problem with libreoffice,
the problem is with the boost headers and files
You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
but somehow the makefiles searches
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with a port I am currently maintaining. This is
the log from pointyhat:
erwin@freefall:cad/openvsp make fetch
=== License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
61 matches
Mail list logo
