Hi all,
We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
Let's first start with the first one:
1/ since 0.26 devel/pkg-config expects pkg-config and glib2 to be present to be
able to built, and glib2 also depends
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
Let's first start with the first one:
1/ since 0.26 devel/pkg-config
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
On 07/25/2012 23:26, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Sorry, I meant of course the Makefile of the new devel/pkgconf :)
Actually every file in the port was duplicated. I just fixed it since
this is a pretty important thing to NOT have broken.
--
Change is hard.
On 07/25/2012 11:12 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
We just switched devel/pkg-config to devel/pkgconf for that reason (see
UPDATING for instructions)
The content of the files in the new pkgconf port are doubled up.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:27:21PM -0700, Russell Jackson wrote:
On 07/25/2012 11:12 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
We just switched devel/pkg-config to devel/pkgconf for that reason (see
UPDATING for instructions)
The content of the files in the new pkgconf port are doubled up.
Baptiste,
I'm fairly upset about how you've handled this. This is going to be a
long message, so I'll try to put the important parts first.
1. When we talked about this problem on IRC you said that you were going
on vacation for 10 days starting real soon, and wouldn't be addressing
this issue
A simple grep of the tree shows at least 644 more uses of USE_GNOME=
pkgconfig, including some in bsd.xorg.mk.
Is work being undertaken to fix these, or have they been left as is on
purpose?
The fact that bsd.xorg.mk already pulls in USE_GNOME=pkgconfig in the
right places also suggests that it
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:22:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
A simple grep of the tree shows at least 644 more uses of USE_GNOME=
pkgconfig, including some in bsd.xorg.mk.
Is work being undertaken to fix these, or have they been left as is on
purpose?
Yes on purpose because of the large
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:15:28AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Baptiste,
I'm fairly upset about how you've handled this. This is going to be a
long message, so I'll try to put the important parts first.
And I'm fairly upset by your constant insultant and irrespectful behaviour...
1. When
I was checking my installation with sysutils/libchk.
I get:
Unresolvable link(s) found in: /usr/local/lib/gtk-3.0/3.0.0/immodules/im-xim.so
libpng.so.6
Unresolvable link(s) found in: /usr/local/lib/gtk-3.0/3.0.0/immodules/im-viqr.so
libpng.so.6
Unresolvable link(s) found in:
on 26/07/2012 03:31 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
I guess you had installed OpenSSL from ports. ;-)
Yes, bingo.
Now I am able to build it with GCC 4.6:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/libreoffice-20120725.tar.bz2
Basically, bsd.openssl.mk adds -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib to
LDFLAGS
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
$ pkg which /usr/local/lib/gtk-3.0/3.0.0/immodules/im-multipress.so
/usr/local/lib/gtk-3.0/3.0.0/immodules/im-multipress.so was not found in the
database
Does anybody know what port might've
installed these?
Try x11-toolkits/gtk30?
(Based
Em Qui, 2012-07-26 às 15:18 +0300, Andriy Gapon escreveu:
on 26/07/2012 03:31 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
I guess you had installed OpenSSL from ports. ;-)
Yes, bingo.
for me (amd64,freebsd 8.3 stable, dual Xeon, 12 cpu) run time=90
minutes.
It only builds with:
clang-devel (3.2)
On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de
wrote:
The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and
Jase Thew wrote:
On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific is
the
options file.
if most people want the options file to not have the final priority, why
not,
can others spread their opinion here?
On 7/26/2012 7:41 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jase Thew wrote:
On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific is
the
options file.
if most people want the options file to not have the final priority, why
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7/26/2012 7:41 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jase Thew wrote:
On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific
is the
options file.
if
Hello!
I've created a port of bittorrent-libutp -- a piece of software, that has not
been officially released yet. It is in use by a number of other projects (like
net-p2p/transmission/). The not-yet-committed port can be found at:
http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/port-stuff/libutp.shar
The
Here's an amusing little SVN bug I chanced upon to keep you all on your
toes.
Files with embedded carriage returns (that's ascii character 13,
variously known as \r, ^M, \015, \x0D) can result in subversion
producing a broken diff.
Eg.
This is what CVS produced (which is correct, and patch(1)
Am 25.07.2012 12:47, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 24.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht:
mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64
-current boxes after it was updated from 1.4
to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few
On 27.07.12 01:07, ajtiM wrote:
Dear Sir,
On my FreeBSD 9.0 Release I have a proble to build Firefox 14.0.1_1:
configure: error: You must specify a default toolkit (perhaps cairo-gtk2).
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to ge...@freebsd.org [maintainer]
On Jul 26, 2012, at 16:42, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
Hello!
I've created a port of bittorrent-libutp -- a piece of software, that has not
been officially released yet. It is in use by a number of other projects
(like net-p2p/transmission/). The not-yet-committed port
[1]Click here to unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receiv= e our
emails
Dear Partner, = nb= sp;= ;
n= bsp;
Information Technology Management (ITM Sys) is a = highly recognized
provider of professional IT Consulting services
On 26.07.2012 19:41, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Check out ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel for an example.
It uses a known hash, but you can use tags as well.
Thanks for the pointer! Yes, that's it... The port uses a separate
variable (GITVERSION) instead of just calling it DISTVERSION -- no
doubt, to
Greetings
I have been unable to build rxvt-unicode since updating perl to 5.16. I
thought I saw an email that someone else had this problem but I cannot
find it.
Here is the failure:
*** Optionally check src/feature.h for further, rarely used options ***
=== Building for rxvt-unicode-9.15_1
Don't forget about our free shipping coupon for orders over $100.
This coupon expires at the end of the month. To use this coupon, just
type in freeship at checkout. Also, don't forget about the super
deals we have right now on Agmatine, D-Aspartic Acid, Creatine, and
Beta
27 matches
Mail list logo
