I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired: has
vulnerabilities and is EOL
How should I do.
Delete it from my machine? How about flash support? Not very important
but nice to have ;-)
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:44:09 +0200
Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote:
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired:
has vulnerabilities and is EOL
But it will work, if you have it installed
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu:
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
It wasn't discussed on the list, just on #bsdports.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired: has
vulnerabilities and is EOL
How should I do.
2012-08-27 09:55, Sergey V. Dyatko skrev:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:44:09 +0200
Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote:
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired:
has vulnerabilities and is EOL
2012-08-27 09:55, René Ladan skrev:
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu:
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
It wasn't discussed on the list, just on #bsdports.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has been deleted: Has expired: has
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu:
2012-08-27 09:55, René Ladan skrev:
2012/8/27 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu:
I think I missed the information if it's been discussed on the list.
It wasn't discussed on the list, just on #bsdports.
The www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 port has
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:52:01AM +0700, Alexander Wolf wrote:
Today has been released Stellarium 0.11.4 with improvements for *BSD systems.
http://astro.uni-altai.ru/~aw/patches/FreeBSD-stellarium.patch
Thanks for the patch (albeit it's incomplete: missing distinfo and
pkg-plist changes,
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
2012/8/26 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
I received more feedback about keep pkg and changing it to
pkg-bootstrap, so what should I do, changing it because you are asking for it?
So, just a me too for renaming pkg, for consistency. I don't mind
the new name...
--
Olivier Smedts
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
=20
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD:
On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
=20
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom:
On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time
from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on
holiday, I couldn't wait for send-pr tiem out, didnt want to
invoke send-pr, I fell
Hi,
Reference:
From: Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:02:15 -0500
Message-id: 503b6fd7.4060...@shatow.net
Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
#2 0x0060deea in initialize_all_files ()
#3 0x005e710f in gdb_init ()
#4 0x00549086 in
Eitan Adler wrote:
On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time
from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on
holiday, I couldn't wait for send-pr tiem out, didnt want to
on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
#2 0x0060deea in initialize_all_files ()
#3 0x005e710f in
I'm waiting someone commit this:
ports/171109
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1
on 27/08/2012 17:44 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
#2 0x0060deea
on 27/08/2012 17:48 Luca Pizzamiglio said the following:
I'm waiting someone commit this:
ports/171109
Great, thanks!
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 27/08/2012 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation
on 27/08/2012 17:51 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 27/08/2012 17:48 Luca Pizzamiglio said the following:
I'm waiting someone commit this:
ports/171109
Great, thanks!
BTW, you might want to fix another issue along the way: make reinstall fails
because of an existing symlink. -f option
On 08/27/12 16:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault
...
#0 0x004777e2 in i386_use_watchpoints ()
#1 0x00476bbd in _initialize_amd64fbsd_nat ()
#2 0x0060deea in initialize_all_files ()
#3 0x005e710f in gdb_init ()
#4
Hi,
Hans : have you tried the patch included here ports/171109?
Andriy: thanks for the report, I create a patch for that as soon as I can!
Regards,
Luca
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Hans Ottevanger h...@beastielabs.net wrote:
On 08/27/12 16:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Program terminated with
On 08/27/12 17:06, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
Hi,
Hans : have you tried the patch included here ports/171109?
With that patch gdb75 comes back to life again on amd64, and stops
spewing weird messages while starting up on both amd64 and i386. If I
stumble over more issues I will let you know.
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
deinstalled:
# cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for math/lapack
=== Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2
The following packages will be deinstalled:
lapack-3.4.0_2
The deinstallation will free
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Wal Mart is looking for Secret ~Shoppers to help us checkout our stores in
your area and we will pay you.
Please visit our page to
SignUp
..
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Gerald,
It seems that if lang/gcc46 is installed, and then you attempt to update
it, lang/gcc shows up in the output of build-depends-list,
run-depends-list, or perhaps both. If lang/gcc46 is not installed
already, this doesn't happen.
This would seem to be an error in the bsd.gcc.mk logic, or
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:35:14PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Gerald,
It seems that if lang/gcc46 is installed, and then you attempt to update
it, lang/gcc shows up in the output of build-depends-list,
run-depends-list, or perhaps both. If lang/gcc46 is not installed
already, this doesn't
On 8/27/2012 12:44 PM, David Wolfskill wrote:
FWIW, on the machine on which I'm writing this note, I successfully
performed an:
Upgrade of gcc-4.6.4.20120608 to gcc-4.6.4.20120817
yesterday without incident (using portmaster).
Do you have lang/gcc installed, or lang/gcc46?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:46:27PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
...
Do you have lang/gcc installed, or lang/gcc46?
pkg_info -qo gcc-4.6\*
albert(8.3-S)[5] pkg_info -qo gcc-4.6\*
lang/gcc46
albert(8.3-S)[6]
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:03:46PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
deinstalled:
# cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for math/lapack
=== Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2
The following packages will
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
deinstalled:
# cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for math/lapack
=== Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2
The following packages will be deinstalled:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
deinstalled:
# cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for math/lapack
===
On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
deinstalled:
# cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
# make deinstall
===
I elected to do a complete re-install of an 8.3 server, and kde4 fails
because of dependencies:
x11/kde4 depends on:
misc/kdeedu4 which depends on:
japanese/kiten WHICH FAILS
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of course, you can use OPTIONS to deselect the dependencies. What's
the problem, anyway? Can you paste a log?
On 2012-08-27 23:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote:
PKG_NG seems to have introduced a
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:20:16AM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 23:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-27
this is on a fresh install of 8.3, and AFTER running a csup
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-27 3:16 PM:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
= kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is not in /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo.
= Either /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo is out of date, or
= kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is spelled incorrectly.
*** Error code 1
Can you show the output of
On 27 August 2012 10:23, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
No,
- eg, If MAINTAINER of hylafax had resigned I would have resumed maintenance.
This is unrelated to you being the original contributor. It is you,
thankfully, being interested in the port. :)
- Creators
On 08/26/12 17:02, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487 2012-07-24 19:23:23Z
43 matches
Mail list logo
