Re: flashplugin 11.2r202.238

2012-10-02 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
01.10.2012 21:33, Jerry wrote: I just finished installing linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238. For some inexplicable reason, it is no longer working. I followed the directions in UPDATING but without success. I even cleared out the entries in the ~/.mozilla/plugins directory and reran the command

removing non-existent ports from /var/db/pkg ?

2012-10-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I have on one system: # ls /var/db/pkg apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_1 help2man-1.40.10pkgconf-0.8.4 auditfile help2man-1.40.11pkgconf-0.8.5 autoconf-2.69 help2man-1.40.12pkgconf-0.8.6 automake-1.12.2

Re: security/sudo *** [pre-install] Signal 11

2012-10-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From mexas Mon Oct 1 10:51:13 2012 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, w...@freebsd.org Subject: security/sudo *** [pre-install] Signal 11 Reply-To: me...@bristol.ac.uk # make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 === Installing for sudo-1.8.6.p3_1 ===

Re: removing non-existent ports from /var/db/pkg ?

2012-10-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 02/10/2012 09:08, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I have on one system: # ls /var/db/pkg apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_1 help2man-1.40.10pkgconf-0.8.4 auditfile help2man-1.40.11pkgconf-0.8.5 autoconf-2.69 help2man-1.40.12

Re: Problem upgrading misc/help2man: missing language files

2012-10-02 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl: Below it looks like the creation of the backup package fails, which get's deleted by default after the new port is installed. I Just update ports on a CURRENT server with csup from cvsup4.nl.FreeBSD.org and the help2man version is still 1.40.12 I will go

Re: removing non-existent ports from /var/db/pkg ?

2012-10-02 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ Matthew Seaman wrote on Tue 2.Oct'12 at 10:32:56 +0100 ] On 02/10/2012 09:08, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I have on one system: # ls /var/db/pkg apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_1 help2man-1.40.10 pkgconf-0.8.4 auditfile help2man-1.40.11

Re: removing non-existent ports from /var/db/pkg ?

2012-10-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 02/10/2012 11:33, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Hi Matthew and Anton, so in the meantime what is the best way to clear this old stuff out? I do like to clear out code and files that are redundant, where possible. What would you suggest? At the moment, the only way to clear up is to manually

sudo-1.8.6.p3_1 is broken on ia64 -current. What svn revision do I need to get back to sudo-1.8.5.p3

2012-10-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I updated from sudo-1.8.5.p3 to sudo-1.8.6.p3_1 on ia64 r235474. The new version segfaults all the time. I'm in a hurry to get a working sudo back, because it's required for the portscluster builds. Please advise what svn revision I need to go back to get to sudo-1.8.5p3. Thanks Anton

Re: sudo-1.8.6.p3_1 is broken on ia64 -current. What svn revision do I need to get back to sudo-1.8.5.p3

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:30:26 +0100 (BST) Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: I updated from sudo-1.8.5.p3 to sudo-1.8.6.p3_1 on ia64 r235474. The new version segfaults all the time. I'm in a hurry to get a working sudo back, because it's required for the portscluster builds.

Re: removing non-existent ports from /var/db/pkg ?

2012-10-02 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ Matthew Seaman wrote on Tue 2.Oct'12 at 12:13:05 +0100 ] At the moment, the only way to clear up is to manually remove the outdated subdirectories from /var/db/ports. You can work out what is out of date by comparing the list of sub-dirs to the list of installed ports obtained by

Re: security/sudo *** [pre-install] Signal 11

2012-10-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From mexas Tue Oct 2 10:21:10 2012 From mexas Mon Oct 1 10:51:13 2012 # make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 === Installing for sudo-1.8.6.p3_1 === Generating temporary packing list if test -d ./.hg cd .;

How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:23:23AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails. That depends on the nature of the repository you are using. What I do is maintain local private mirrors of the

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 10/02/12 11:23, Paul Schmehl wrote: Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails. I think you are supposed to use *csup* or svn. But use svn - it is easy, and csup is going to be phased out very soon.

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com writes: Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails. If you rarely need more than the latest version of the ports tree, then portsnap(8) is worth strong consideration. If you have

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 2, 2012 1:00:52 PM -0400 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com writes: Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails. If you rarely need more

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Eitan Adler
On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: I obviously wasn't very clear. I'm a port maintainer. I need to update one of my ports. I used to do this by checking out the port into a purpose-created directory in which I would use cvs to make changes and test. After

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: I obviously wasn't very clear. I'm a port maintainer. I need to update one of my ports. I used to do this by checking out the port into a

Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6

2012-10-02 Thread Shane Ambler
I found a situation where gcc v4.2 compiles a i386 working binary and v4.6 doesn't. (Currently 4.7 and 4.8 fail to build this code) I have verified that this happens with 8.2/8.3/9.0 i386 systems. x86_64 versions build without issue as does clang i386/x86_64. It appears that the x86_64 target of

Re: removing non-existent ports from /var/db/pkg ?

2012-10-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk On 02/10/2012 12:38, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: [ Matthew Seaman wrote on Tue 2.Oct'12 at 12:13:05 +0100 ] =20 =20 At the moment, the only way to clear up is to manually remove the

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 2, 2012 11:28:12 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote: On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:14:26 -0500 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: --On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Eitan Adler
On 2 October 2012 22:54, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: --On October 2, 2012 11:28:12 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote: On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:14:26 -0500 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: --On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/2/2012 10:54 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: How do I handle this? firnsy-barnyard2-v2-1.10-0-g2f5d496.tar.gz Is the string at the end (g2f5d496) auto-generated? If so, that's another problem. I guess something like this? Sheesh. What a PITA. PORTNAME= barnyard2-v2 PORTVERSION=