To read the text in Spanish and take advantage our interactive format, we
recommend reading our e-mails in format HTML.
We host our documents on the secure server Skydrive; We are natural persons in
a private market, for this motive we use communication no corporate. We
appreciate your
from Polytropon:
A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
# make config-recursive
Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run.
According to man 7 ports, there's a BATCH setting, but
it is
On 8 Oct 2012 09:38, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
from Polytropon:
A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
# make config-recursive
Once set, the options won't be requested on a
On 8 Oct 2012 10:16, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 Oct 2012 09:38, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
from Polytropon:
A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
# make
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
I see the below shown error on only one of my FreeBSD boxes driven by
either FreeBSD 9.1-PRE or FreeBSD 10.0-CUR, all amd64 and CLANG built.
Since all FreeBSD 10.0-CUR boxes build the update of that specific port
without complains, I guess there is a nasty hidden little bug in one of
my config
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
=== Building for pgadmin3-1.16.0
cd ./docs/en_US make -f Makefile.sphinx
SPHINXBUILD=/usr/local/bin/sphinx-build htmlhelp
make: illegal option -- -
usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable]
[-d flags] [-E variable] [-f makefile]
08.10.2012 16:13, Борис Самородов пишет:
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
=== Building for pgadmin3-1.16.0
cd ./docs/en_US make -f Makefile.sphinx
SPHINXBUILD=/usr/local/bin/sphinx-build htmlhelp
make: illegal option -- -
usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable]
If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?
--
Andriy Gapon
Hi All,
(the port maintainer is CCed)
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
I've found it out.
When py27-sphinx is installed the databases/pgadmin3 autodetects it
and try to build documentation. From the WRKSRC/Makefile:
Hi!
If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?
See
On 10/08/12 15:13, Борис Самородов wrote:
Hi All,
(the port maintainer is CCed)
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
I've found it out.
When py27-sphinx is installed the databases/pgadmin3 autodetects it
and
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Борис Самородов b...@passap.ru wrote:
(the port maintainer is CCed)
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
I've found it out.
When py27-sphinx is installed the databases/pgadmin3
Am 10/08/12 16:58, schrieb Max Khon:
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Борис Самородов b...@passap.ru wrote:
(the port maintainer is CCed)
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
I've found it out.
When
Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms and
lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
I've been using pkgng for a while now and it never complained about these
packages, but now it produces the following error:
Installing
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms
and
lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
I've been using pkgng for a while now and it never complained about
08.10.2012 18:58, Max Khon пишет:
However I still fail to see what is wrong with this make -f
invocation (why it complains on unknown - parameter). Also, it does
not fail with this error message for me on FreeBSD 9.1.
Seems that the port is _not_ multiple jobs safe. Just changing
Op ma 08 okt 2012 18:30:12 schreef Andriy Gapon:
Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms
and lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
I've been using pkgng for a while now and it never complained about these
packages, but now
Am 10/08/12 17:48, schrieb Борис Самородов:
08.10.2012 18:58, Max Khon пишет:
However I still fail to see what is wrong with this make -f
invocation (why it complains on unknown - parameter). Also, it does
not fail with this error message for me on FreeBSD 9.1.
Seems that the port is
on 08/10/2012 18:51 Oliver Heesakkers said the following:
Op ma 08 okt 2012 18:30:12 schreef Andriy Gapon:
Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms
and lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
I've been using pkgng for a while
On 10/8/2012 8:30 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before
Hello,
there is a native python binding for Firebird database:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/fdb-0.9.1.tgz
It is based on ports/172455 by Jose Jachuf. It builds just fine in
tinderbox both with python2 and python3 but fails to build on a live
system. The difference is that firebird25-client's
23 matches
Mail list logo
