Re: dovecot2-pigeonhole pkgng conflicts

2013-01-22 Thread Matthieu Volat
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:39:29 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with > > mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as > > mail/dov

Re: portsnap and the imminent demise of svn->cvs ports tree export

2013-01-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
> > (current time: Wed 23 Jan 2013 02:43:43 AM UTC) --] > [-- End of PGP output --] > [-- The following data is signed --] > We are on notice that the current ports tree will be soon no longer > available via CVSup and friends. General consumers of the FreeBSD ports > tree are being encouraged

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 & Postgresql

2013-01-22 Thread Shane Ambler
On 23/01/2013 05:30, Owen O' Shaughnessy wrote: Hi Guys, Wondering if anybody else has tried installing Postgres from packages? I have used pkg_add -r to install postgresql-server and postgresql-client, both installed sucessfully, I've got server and client binaries and libraries but no configu

Re: Using bidirectional authentication in pkgng

2013-01-22 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:30:35PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:55:40 + > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > On 18/01/2013 02:57, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > a. I understand that my use case is not necessarily pkgng's top > > >priority. Ultimately requirement 2 is p

Re: dovecot2-pigeonhole pkgng conflicts

2013-01-22 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote: > Hi all, > > I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with > mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as > mail/dovecot2. > > I saw this is a problem that can occur with pkgng, but did not

Re: Status of ports update submitted 2 months ago

2013-01-22 Thread Eitan Adler
On 5 January 2013 05:40, Michael Grünewald wrote: > Hi Mark, > > thank you for your feedback! > > Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:11:54PM +0100, Michael Grünewald wrote: >>> The PRs used to be listed by portsmon but I recently >>> noticed they disappeared. [1] >> portsmon is runn

dovecot2-pigeonhole pkgng conflicts

2013-01-22 Thread Matthieu Volat
Hi all, I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as mail/dovecot2. I saw this is a problem that can occur with pkgng, but did not find any recommandation to workaround this kind of conflict, is there a prefe

FreeBSD 9.1 & Postgresql

2013-01-22 Thread Owen O' Shaughnessy
Hi Guys, Wondering if anybody else has tried installing Postgres from packages? I have used pkg_add -r to install postgresql-server and postgresql-client, both installed sucessfully, I've got server and client binaries and libraries but no configuration files for the server. Does the package ass

Re: Using bidirectional authentication in pkgng

2013-01-22 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:55:40 + Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 18/01/2013 02:57, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > a. I understand that my use case is not necessarily pkgng's top > >priority. Ultimately requirement 2 is pretty nonsensical for > >distributing open source packages > > Well, yes.

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-01-22 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread RW
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:59:56 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: > > I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will > > tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine > > or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file. >

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Guido Falsi
On 01/22/13 17:21, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: On 01/22/13 09:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites m

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/22/13 09:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file. And when there is no conflict

Re: portmaster -w -r (pcre & icu): how to avoid redundant rebuilding?

2013-01-22 Thread RW
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:35:04 -0600 Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > On 01/22/13 06:26, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I see in the UPDATING file that I need to rebuild all ports that > > depend on pcre and icu: > > > > portmaster -w -r pcre > > and > > portmaster -w -r icu > > (I don't need -f ?) > > > > Ho

Re: How to launch services that do not fork to background using the rc infrastructure?

2013-01-22 Thread Mark Felder
Also look at the wrapper script used by net/socat. There are a few ports using that. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Guido Falsi
On 01/22/13 16:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file. And when there is no conflict

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Oliver Lehmann
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file. And when there is no conflict and it can be merged, you have a merged

Re: How to launch services that do not fork to background using the rc infrastructure?

2013-01-22 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/22/13 10:29 AM, Grzegorz Blach wrote: > On 01/22/2013 04:19 PM, Javier Mart■n Rueda wrote: >> The typical and simple rc.d script to launch a service has, >> esentially, the following: >> >> . /etc/rc.subr >> >> name=SERVICE rcvar=SERVICE_enable

Re: How to launch services that do not fork to background using the rc infrastructure?

2013-01-22 Thread Grzegorz Blach
On 01/22/2013 04:19 PM, Javier Martín Rueda wrote: The typical and simple rc.d script to launch a service has, esentially, the following: . /etc/rc.subr name=SERVICE rcvar=SERVICE_enable command="/usr/local/sbin/PROGRAM" pidfile=/var/run/${name}.pid SERVICE_enable=${SERVICE_enable:-"NO"} loa

How to launch services that do not fork to background using the rc infrastructure?

2013-01-22 Thread Javier Martín Rueda
The typical and simple rc.d script to launch a service has, esentially, the following: . /etc/rc.subr name=SERVICE rcvar=SERVICE_enable command="/usr/local/sbin/PROGRAM" pidfile=/var/run/${name}.pid SERVICE_enable=${SERVICE_enable:-"NO"} load_rc_config ${name} run_rc_command "$1" One of the

Re: portmaster -w -r (pcre & icu): how to avoid redundant rebuilding?

2013-01-22 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/22/13 06:26, Thomas Mueller wrote: I see in the UPDATING file that I need to rebuild all ports that depend on pcre and icu: portmaster -w -r pcre and portmaster -w -r icu (I don't need -f ?) How do I do this without rebuilding the same ports twice? I am on pkgng, so I can use pkg info -

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/22/13 07:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Guido Falsi wrote: If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and revert your modifications usi

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Guido Falsi
On 01/22/13 14:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Guido Falsi wrote: If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and revert your modifications usi

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Guido Falsi wrote: If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and revert your modifications using it, which can be quite handy. Di

security/nettle regression on sparc64 -current, build failed updating from 2.5 to 2.6

2013-01-22 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
This is on sparc64 r239940 with ports tree at r310800. # pkg info -xo nettle nettle-2.5: security/nettle # Updating to 2.6 I got: cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -ggdb3 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wsrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wnested-ex

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread RW
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:10:26 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in > the past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by > just running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile > stays modified. What

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Guido Falsi
On 01/22/13 13:10, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Hi, in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays modified. What is the suggested way in sy

Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Guido Falsi
On 01/22/13 13:10, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Hi, in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays modified. What is the suggested way in sy

portmaster -w -r (pcre & icu): how to avoid redundant rebuilding?

2013-01-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
I see in the UPDATING file that I need to rebuild all ports that depend on pcre and icu: portmaster -w -r pcre and portmaster -w -r icu (I don't need -f ?) How do I do this without rebuilding the same ports twice? I am on pkgng, so I can use pkg info -r icu and same for pcre to list ports depen

portsnap - overwrite local changes

2013-01-22 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays modified. What is the suggested way in syncing my local portstree 1:1 with