Re: New version of TeX?

2013-02-16 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 16/02/2013 18:31, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 February 2013 13:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote: 04.02.2013 10:21, Dominic Fandrey пишет: > On 04/02/2013 02:04, Danilo Egea wrote: >> Well, there is

Re: When was the last ports tree that worked with RELENG_6?

2013-02-16 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2013-02-16 08:06, Chris Rees wrote: I'm pretty certain that ports on 6.X was broken with OPTIONSng (r297660), but I seem to remember that other compatibility was ripped out before then; perhaps Mark can clarify. r259629 specifically talks about removing 6.3 shims, but that is way before. 25

Re: New version of TeX?

2013-02-16 Thread Hiroki Sato
Chris Rees wrote in : cr> On 6 February 2013 13:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: cr> > On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote: cr> >> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote: cr> >>> 04.02.2013 10:21, Dominic Fandrey пишет: cr> On 04/02/2013 02:04, Danilo Egea wrote: cr> > Well, there

Re: When was the last ports tree that worked with RELENG_6?

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 Feb 2013 19:22, wrote: > > Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > > I have an old 6.4-R machine which I can take as far as RELENG_6, but no > > further due to a hardware-support issue (special hardware, third party > > driver). The hardware needs to live a while yet, so I'd like to try to get > > the in

Re: When was the last ports tree that worked with RELENG_6?

2013-02-16 Thread Lena
Darren Pilgrim wrote: > I have an old 6.4-R machine which I can take as far as RELENG_6, but no > further due to a hardware-support issue (special hardware, third party > driver). The hardware needs to live a while yet, so I'd like to try to get > the installed ports as up to date as possible. T

Re: New version of TeX?

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 6 February 2013 13:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> 04.02.2013 10:21, Dominic Fandrey пишет: On 04/02/2013 02:04, Danilo Egea wrote: > Well, there is this project http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-

Re: When was the last ports tree that worked with RELENG_6?

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 February 2013 15:55, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > I have an old 6.4-R machine which I can take as far as RELENG_6, but no > further due to a hardware-support issue (special hardware, third party > driver). The hardware needs to live a while yet, so I'd like to try to get > the installed ports as

When was the last ports tree that worked with RELENG_6?

2013-02-16 Thread Darren Pilgrim
I have an old 6.4-R machine which I can take as far as RELENG_6, but no further due to a hardware-support issue (special hardware, third party driver). The hardware needs to live a while yet, so I'd like to try to get the installed ports as up to date as possible. The current ports tree doesn

openfire start up problem

2013-02-16 Thread David Southwell
Hi Openfire not running from new install freebsd 8.2 amd64 # service openfire start starting openfire # service openfire status /usr/local/etc/rc.d/openfire WARNING: no shebang line in COPYRIGHT openfire nopt running (check /var/run/openfire.pid) Thanks in advance for any guidance David -- Da

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2: database replication on demand - easy way (Bucardo in ports not available)

2013-02-16 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## O. Hartmann (ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de): > I feel realy uncomfortable with the built-in streaming replication of > PostgreSQL 9.2 since I never managed it to make a successful > replication. As far as I understand, the streaming mechanism of > PostgreSQL 9.X expects the "slaves" to be always

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-02-16 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

PostgreSQL 9.2: database replication on demand - easy way (Bucardo in ports not available)

2013-02-16 Thread O. Hartmann
Dear Sirs. I send my question to this list in the hope someone has the same problems and already found a solution. I will start explaining the background and my difficulties with recent solutions. We/I have a FreeBSD 10 box running a PostgreSQL 9.2 server containing literature references via RefD