Hi,
would someone please takeover PR ports/170632? It's been open
for 6 months now. The version in the ports collection is already
6 patchlevels behind the current version of OTRS. But it's not
due to a lack of maintenance or contributions.
Several people invested time, sent patches, posted
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Am 20.02.2013 um 16:34 schrieb Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
I can confirm that with the new port version on a two day old current, the
module doesn't work:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-current.lassitu.de
It was approved by the maintainer a week ago, but hasn't been committed
yet. If someone would pick this one up soon it would be appreciated,
thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
Am 20.02.2013 um 16:34 schrieb Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
I can confirm that with the new port version on a two day old current, the
module
On 2/25/2013 4:13 AM, Frank Wall wrote:
Hi,
would someone please takeover PR ports/170632? It's been open
for 6 months now. The version in the ports collection is already
6 patchlevels behind the current version of OTRS. But it's not
due to a lack of maintenance or contributions.
On Monday 25 February 2013 11:44:20 Darren Pilgrim wrote:
It was approved by the maintainer a week ago, but hasn't been committed
yet. If someone would pick this one up soon it would be appreciated,
thanks.
I got it and committed the patch.
Beech
I'd like to share packages between a couple of nearly identical machines in a
server farm. I think I have the following options:
1. Set up apache httpd on one primary machine to serve the packages to the
others by pointing website root to to /var/cache/pkg/ and setting PACKAGESITE
in the
On 2/25/2013 4:13 AM, Frank Wall wrote:
Hi,
would someone please takeover PR ports/170632? It's been open
for 6 months now. The version in the ports collection is already
6 patchlevels behind the current version of OTRS. But it's not
due to a lack of maintenance or contributions.
Just to add a 'something else', unsure how fully it may suffice...
[details at the bottom]
--- On Mon, 2/25/13, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote:
From: Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au
Subject: Share /var/cache/pkg/ between machines
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, February
You could put /var/cache/pkg on NFS, writable by all clients. However,
my preference would be to put the pkg repo on NFS and not use cache at
all. At the moment I clean out cache daily via periodic(8).
--
James.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
Aristedes Maniatis
Sent: Tuesday, 26 February 2013 1:58 PM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Share /var/cache/pkg/ between machines
I'd like to share packages
I don't understand how do you imagine magical appearing 80 Mb JDK from
any one place to other without pulling data from internet? :)
In any case, with any kind of sharing you probably will have almost same
traffic, maybe even greater than if you choose simple `pkg install` traffic.
1 - pointless,
On 26/02/13 5:22pm, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
I don't understand how do you imagine magical appearing 80 Mb JDK from any
one place to other without pulling data from internet? :)
In any case, with any kind of sharing you probably will have almost same
traffic, maybe even greater than if you
14 matches
Mail list logo
