Le 25/04/2013 04:23, Kubilay Kocak a écrit :
On 24/04/2013 11:18 PM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
The same here. Default options, no CFLAGS tunning, up-to-date ports,
sams system.
Le 24/04/2013 14:40, Tzanetos Balitsaris a écrit :
Hello,
The port lang/python33 cannot be built. It stops when
Synopsis: new port: dns/bind10
Responsible-Changed-From-To: po...@freebsd.org-freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Apr 25 09:48:42 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Canonicalize assignment.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176782
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:05:53AM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:48:52 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 April 2013 21:01, Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:56:32 +0200
Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote:
On Wed, 10
Hi!
I don't know if the maintainer of devel/libcheck is active, so I forward
this report to po...@freebsd.org, hoping that someone will look into it.
/Martin
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Martin Olsson [mailto:martin.ols...@sentor.se]
Skickat: den 24 april 2013 12:24
Till:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 03:01:24PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
Hi!
I don't know if the maintainer of devel/libcheck is active, so I forward
this report to po...@freebsd.org, hoping that someone will look into it.
/Martin
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Martin Olsson
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
This has been fixed, please update your ports tree.
Hi Baptiste!
I have updated the ports tree. Still same error. :-/
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Ports tree hasn't
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 03:55:16PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
This has been fixed, please update your ports tree.
Hi Baptiste!
I have updated the ports tree. Still same error. :-/
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:41:34PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Can you send me your config.log and the Makefile of libcheck (the port one)
I removed the work dir
I updated the port tree again
I ran 'portmaster --no-confirm -adgf' again and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/25/13 1:39 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 22:53 (UTC+1) schrieb Greg Larkin:
On 4/24/13 1:38 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Oops, sorry for answering myself. But the typo gremlin
appeared.
On 23.04.2013 18:38 (UTC+2), Rainer Hurling
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:41:34PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Can you send me your config.log and the Makefile of libcheck (the port one)
I removed the work dir
I updated the port tree again
I ran
Well, I don't know what the problem was. But if I chose to [i]gnore the
fault instead of [a]bort the whole run, a new package was created
sucessfully.
If I then re-ran the command to rebuild libcheck, it worked fine,
probably because it could now sucessfully create that backup of the old
On 25 April 2013 04:40, Grant D. Watson grant_wat...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ports folks,
I sent a message to Kevin Lo, since the ports search site lists his address
for ubuntu-font, but he said this isn't his area.
I am a Linux user who's been playing with FreeBSD and enjoying it; in
creating
Hello,
Currently the ports tree has unified ports for python and ruby modules with
origin like databases/py-sqlalchemy. When someone wants to bulk the ports tree
to create packages the databases/py-sqlalchemy will only be built against the
current python version set in Mk/bsd.python.mk (or
On 25/04/2013 22:03, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
Currently the ports tree has unified ports for python and ruby modules with
origin like databases/py-sqlalchemy. When someone wants to bulk the ports
tree
to create packages the databases/py-sqlalchemy will only be built against the
Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 22:13:16 Florent Peterschmitt a écrit :
On 25/04/2013 22:03, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
Currently the ports tree has unified ports for python and ruby modules
with
origin like databases/py-sqlalchemy. When someone wants to bulk the ports
tree to create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/25/13 12:02 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 25.04.2013 17:02 (UTC+2), Greg Larkin wrote:
On 4/25/13 1:39 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 22:53 (UTC+1) schrieb Greg Larkin:
On 4/24/13 1:38 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Oops, sorry for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/25/13 12:02 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 25.04.2013 17:02 (UTC+2), Greg Larkin wrote:
On 4/25/13 1:39 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 22:53 (UTC+1) schrieb Greg Larkin:
On 4/24/13 1:38 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Oops, sorry for
On, Thu Apr 25, 2013, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
Currently the ports tree has unified ports for python and ruby modules with
origin like databases/py-sqlalchemy. When someone wants to bulk the
ports tree to create packages the databases/py-sqlalchemy will only
be built against the
On, Thu Apr 25, 2013, David Demelier wrote:
[...]
And if a port requires a py- module but for a specific version, how is it
possible to share PYTHON_VERSION= through dependencies?
This is done at the moment by using
# Propagate the chosen python version to submakes.
.MAKEFLAGS:
Am 25.04.2013 22:40 (UTC+1) schrieb Greg Larkin:
On 4/25/13 12:02 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 25.04.2013 17:02 (UTC+2), Greg Larkin wrote:
On 4/25/13 1:39 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 22:53 (UTC+1) schrieb Greg Larkin:
On 4/24/13 1:38 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Oops, sorry for
21 matches
Mail list logo
