Hello!
FreeBSD's ports are going now to the new staged and optionNGed world.
Of course, freebsd porters pages have to be updated.
But, I'd like suggest something more easy, for the first glance.
Let's define a couple of ports about which we can say Yes, this port
is an example of reference
setting MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE didn't do it for me. furthermore, i have more
peculiarities to report:
my testing earlier, (where i got the build/package/install to succeed
by doing `make clean make sleep 1 make package`) resulted in
quietly installing a borked program. dnscache-conf then yells
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
How can I list all options currently available in ports tree for
OPTIONS_UNSET /SET
to make a switch to a new syntax?
I have suspicion that there were a lot of duplicates before, hope it's
cleaned up.
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, buddha knowledgeispowe...@gmail.com wrote:
cc: error: unknown argument: '-R/usr/local/lib'
Python build finished, but the necessary bits to build these modules were not
found:
_bsddb _tkinter dl
imageoplinuxaudiodev
Joe Nosay superbisq...@gmail.com writes:
jack_trauma.c:21:9: warning: 'IP_DONTFRAG' macro redefined
#define IP_DONTFRAG 1
^
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:464:
9: note: previous definition is here
#define IP_DONTFRAG 67 /* don't fragment packet */
^
Hi,
I wonder what happend to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177413 - it was in
ports tree for a while and now it's gone.
--
best regards,
Lukasz Wasikowski
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
Hi,
I wonder what happend to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177413 - it was in
ports tree for a while and now it's gone.
according to /usr/ports/MOVED:
www/mod_macro24||2013-08-03|Has expired: part of Apache 2.4.6 and newer
/usr/ports/MOVED is the first place to
I'm trying to build shells/ksh93 on FB 10-stable and it fails to build the
work/bin/ksh93 program. The tail of the build log is:
=== Staging for ksh93-20120801_1
=== Generating temporary packing list
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh
when checking postmaster -L I get:
=== pkg-1.2.6
=== No /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg exists, and no information
=== about ports-mgmt/pkg can be found in /usr/ports/MOVED
and the same for
=== cclient-2007f,1
=== net-snmp-5.7.2_3
=== vim-7.4.182
I know pkg just got reinstalled by
## J. W. Ballantine (j...@hera.homer.att.com):
I'm trying to build shells/ksh93 on FB 10-stable and it fails to build the
work/bin/ksh93 program. The tail of the build log is:
i386?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185256 (patch included).
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
On 27 Feb 2014, at 11:43, Chad J. Milios mil...@ccsys.com wrote:
setting MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE didn't do it for me. furthermore, i have more
peculiarities to report:
my testing earlier, (where i got the build/package/install to succeed by
doing `make clean make sleep 1 make package`)
W dniu 2014-02-27 17:55, Serpent7776 pisze:
I wonder what happend to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177413 - it was in
ports tree for a while and now it's gone.
according to /usr/ports/MOVED:
www/mod_macro24||2013-08-03|Has expired: part of Apache 2.4.6 and newer
| Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:16:42 +0100
| From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder c...@burggraben.net
| To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
| Subject: Re: ksh93 build failure
| Message-ID: 20140227191642.ga3...@elch.exwg.net
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
| ## J. W. Ballantine
On 02/27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
I stumbled over the same problem today on 10.0, make NO_STAGE=1
install worked for me on the first attempt though. I can also confirm
the problem with dnscache-conf when installing the binary package
using pkg install.
Can you confirm the exact version you
On 26/02/2014 9:27 AM, John Marino wrote:
On 2/25/2014 23:08, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Can we stop advertising the above, this is completly wrong, it hides the
dust behind the carpet and won't fix anything!
The said port is needed a fix.
Granted: it's not
I am not at all clear how to perform a migration of machines that
run authoritative nameservers from FreeBSD 9.x - 10.x, given the
current setup of the dns/bind99 port. I'm hoping for some clues,
if not insight.
I have been building running both stable/9 stable/10 (on different
slices) for
# portmaster mail/postfix210
[...]
=== Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports
=== Launching child to install databases/db41
=== postfix210-2.10.3,1 databases/db41 (1/1)
Why?
postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is set for version 5.3
# cat
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Sergey V. Dyatko ti...@agava.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:26:34 +0300
Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I use sysutils/bsdadminscripts for years, thanks Dominic. After
switching to pkg[ng] I patch pkg_libchk for it ( pkg info
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes:
# portmaster mail/postfix210
[...]
=== Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports
=== Launching child to install databases/db41
=== postfix210-2.10.3,1 databases/db41 (1/1)
Why?
postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes:
# portmaster mail/postfix210
[...]
=== Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports
=== Launching child to install databases/db41
=== postfix210-2.10.3,1 databases/db41 (1/1)
Why?
postfix certainly
What's the proper use for:
WITH_$PORT_VER=
DEFAULT_$PORT_VER=
$PORT_PORT=
Example:
WITH_BDB_VER=5
DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER=93
APACHE_PORT=www/apache24
Are they essentially interchangeable and achieve the same result?
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
LuKreme
Hi there,
in message e4a0824e48a6355c9daee75280b1b999.authentica...@ultimatedns.net,
wrote Chris H thusly...
I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last
updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011).
Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise?
(If it
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:17:54 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Sergey V. Dyatko ti...@agava.com
wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:26:34 +0300
Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I use sysutils/bsdadminscripts for
Hi, Chris!
I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last
updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011).
Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise?
(If it is not obvious, I am not an user.)
While here, would anybody want to pick up the
В Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:32:18 +0300
Sergey V. Dyatko ti...@agava.com пишет:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:26:34 +0300
Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I use sysutils/bsdadminscripts for years, thanks Dominic. After
switching to pkg[ng] I patch pkg_libchk for it ( pkg info
Hello,
I am using slrn and vim to post messages on Usenet.
Vim is running with the UTF-8 encoding set.
To avoid posting messages in UTF-8 when it is not needed, the following
rules is defined in the slrn resource file:
charset outgoing us-ascii,iso-8859-1,iso-8859-15,utf-8
This means that
27 matches
Mail list logo
