Can you please close ports/184033 and ports/189749 as they have been
superseded by Revision 354447.
Alas I forgot to include [patch] in the subject or that I had tested
under poudriere so they understandably got missed.
Thanks for updating them,
Alan
Stageify.
Approved by:portmgr@
-
Build ID: 20140524073800-54585
Job owner: vani...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 4 minutes
Enddate: Sat, 24 May 2014 07:42:06 GMT
Revision:
On 2014-05-23 23:57, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
Hi,
after updating p5-Net-DNS from version 0.74 to 0.75
postfix-policyd-weight (0.1.15.2) stopped working.
I get the below error on two systems:
May 23 13:31:35 mx postfix/policyd-weight[1037]: child: spawned
May 23 13:31:35 mx
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
On Sat, 24 May 2014 07:28:07 +0100 Alan Hicks wrote:
Can you please close ports/184033 and ports/189749 as they have been
superseded by Revision 354447.
Alas I forgot to include [patch] in the subject or that I had tested
under poudriere so they understandably got missed.
The gmime2 and
The security/ppars port currently has this statement
RUN_DEPENDS= p5-Net-Netmask=0:${PORTSDIR}/net-mgmt/p5-Net-Netmask
Here is the problem, if pkg install p5-Net-Netmask is done prier to
make install on the port, the port checks the hosts ports tree for
/net-mgmt/p5-Net-Netmask and recompiles
After a break for over a month due to connectivity issues and other RL crap, a
followup appears...
On Sunday 13 April 2014 20:36:58 John Marino wrote:
On 4/13/2014 19:52, Matthew Rezny wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2014 18:16:15 John Marino wrote:
On 4/13/2014 17:46, Matthew Rezny wrote:
On
Hi!
Matthew Rezny wrote:
[...]
If you don't like it, then don't do it, but don't stand in the way of anyone
else that does. Also, cut the crap. If maintainer is ports@, then what that
literally means is the ports community as a whole is maintaining those ports.
If they are not maintained
Hi,
My favorite mailer alpine has no port maintainer at the moment. Ports
that have no maintainer and/or staging are at risk of being deleted from
the portstree, and alpine is a port that I would definitely miss.
So I was thinking of becoming a port maintainer. Although I'm using
FreeBSD
Hi!
My favorite mailer alpine has no port maintainer at the moment. Ports
that have no maintainer and/or staging are at risk of being deleted from
the portstree, and alpine is a port that I would definitely miss.
So I was thinking of becoming a port maintainer. Although I'm using
Before I say anything - tonight is a bottle of wine and a night off... ;-)
Also, I've done the steps of fix, stage, and claim maintership. The issue is
honestly be the maintainer. How can I honestly call myself the maintainer
when I can't actually do anything to the port myself.
If
On Sat, 24 May 2014, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote:
My favorite mailer alpine has no port maintainer at the moment. Ports
that have no maintainer and/or staging are at risk of being deleted from
the portstree, and alpine is a port that I would definitely miss.
So I was thinking of becoming a port
Hi!
[maintaining mail/alpine]
So I was thinking of becoming a port maintainer. Although I'm using
FreeBSD for 15 years now, I have no programming experience at all.
Do you have experience building software ? What is your background ?
Other than building ports, no. I don't have an IT
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote:
The version in ports is old but alpine is still being developed and
currently at version 2.11.
UW says the latest version is 2.00 .. Ubuntu released 2.02 a while back,
Wikipedia says 2.11 .. but it also says UW has the
Hi!
The version in ports is old but alpine is still being developed and
currently at version 2.11.
UW says the latest version is 2.00 .. Ubuntu released 2.02 a while back,
Wikipedia says 2.11 .. but it also says UW has the latest - which says
2.00 .. feel free to point me at where 2.11 is
Hi!
They just need converting to a staged environment? If so if you'd like
to take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=189880 and
tell me if I did it right and tell me how I can choose something that
no-one is working on I'll crack on with some of them.
I test-build the
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
The version in ports is old but alpine is still being developed and
currently at version 2.11.
UW says the latest version is 2.00 .. Ubuntu released 2.02 a while back,
Wikipedia says 2.11 .. but it also says UW has the latest - which says
2.00 .. feel
On Sat, 24 May 2014, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote:
How many ports did you already build yourself ? On which fbsd versions ?
Did you sometimes fix ports to get them to build ?
Using FreeBSD since 4.0 (I think) as my main OS, and always used ports, so
it must be hundreds? Problems I fixed myself
Hi!
http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/release/
has a link.
https://www.mpeters.org/mirror/alpine-2.11.tar.xz
Gonna be a long night .. site keeps going up and down .. don't have the
source yet .. :/
I've put it on
http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/misc/alpine-2.11.tar.xz
--
p...@opsec.eu
Hi!
I guess (very rough guess, I know) you need between 40 to 80 hours (!)
to dig deep enough to get it done. You need to learn make.
Hmm I think it would be best then to look into make first.
If Michelle is doing the port, she will be much faster, from what
I can see 8-)
But if you want
On Sat, 24 May 2014, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote:
I guess (very rough guess, I know) you need between 40 to 80 hours (!)
to dig deep enough to get it done. You need to learn make.
Hmm I think it would be best then to look into make first.
If Michelle is doing the port, she will be much
Hi all,
since I'm a daily user..
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
I've put it on
http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/misc/alpine-2.11.tar.xz
Feel free to drop me a line too for help or time constraints. Just know
I'll be evading the ncurses stuff ;-)
--
Melvyn
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote:
I guess (very rough guess, I know) you need between 40 to 80 hours (!)
to dig deep enough to get it done. You need to learn make.
Hmm I think it would be best then to look into make first.
If Michelle is doing the
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
They just need converting to a staged environment? If so if you'd like
to take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=189880 and
tell me if I did it right and tell me how I can choose something that
no-one is working on I'll crack on with some of
Hi!
I agree that there was a lot of change in the ports tree recently.
But: There is a reason for this: The ports tree has to be cleaner
so that it can provide better automatic processes to the users.
It's not easy, but it's getting there.
I found a presentation which really goes deep into
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
I agree that there was a lot of change in the ports tree recently.
But: There is a reason for this: The ports tree has to be cleaner
so that it can provide better automatic processes to the users.
It's not easy, but
Add a missing patch to fix build.
-
Build ID: 20140525033000-59676
Job owner: h...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 3 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 25 May 2014 03:33:08 GMT
Revision: 355107
- Remove GlobalPrefs/.config.
- Fix pkg-message.
-
Build ID: 20140525041000-12437
Job owner: h...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 4 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 25 May 2014 04:14:05 GMT
Revision:
Some months ago, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
... if you need any help staging your ports I can provide reviews.
I have a couple of ports that need staging support added, and I've
finally managed to find time to look into it. Having read such
documentation as I could easily find
29 matches
Mail list logo
