Not to be a buzzkill but, build/patch fails in poudriere and on host:
=== Patching for pkg-1.3.0
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for pkg-1.3.0
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to libpkg/pkg_elf.c.rej
= Patch patch-libpkg__pkg_elf.c failed to
Great news!
I've been running the 1.3 prereleases for a while, and aside from one hiccup in
the early alphas, it's been a very pleasant experience.
Thanks to all involved,
David
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:42, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm very please to announce the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 03:11:27AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Any chance of an update to the port? 1.65_01 is the latest version.
The _01 denotes it's a development version that the author has
released to CPAN for people to test, but not recommended for general
use yet.
Tom
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Not to be a buzzkill but, build/patch fails in poudriere and on host:
Clarification: Turns out to be a tree merging problem.
I ran make on the un-merged copy of FreeBSD ports tree and there were no
compile problems.
-
FreeBSD-11-current_amd64_root-on-zfs_RadeonKMS
--
View this message in
On 2014-07-23, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
'pkg version' priorities changed between repository catalogue, ports
index and generating the info out of the ports tree directly. Now if
you have an INDEX file, pkg version will read that for preference, as
it's only about
This package had a critical bug that was fixed on Jul 11th 2014
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191803
Since then there should have been two package build runs (Wed night).
Yet pkg still serves binary packages for the old version 0.30 instead
of 0.31.
Are there any build
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
wrote:
On 2014-07-23, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
'pkg version' priorities changed between repository catalogue, ports
index and generating the info out of the ports tree directly. Now if
I haven't seen any activity on the zoneminder port recently,
and I think I saw that it was slated for removal in a week
because it had not been modified to supoprt staging.
I'm happy to say that I have made good progress on stagifying
this port and hope to submit patches in the next day or two.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:53:12AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote:
Not to be a buzzkill but, build/patch fails in poudriere and on host:
=== Patching for pkg-1.3.0
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for pkg-1.3.0
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects
Hello.
I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that TeXLive is now the default.
Since I've no time to test it now, I'd like to stay with TeTeX for a
further litte while.
So I put TEX_DEFAULT=tetex in /etc/make.conf; however this does not
seem to work: portupgrade -R teTeX tries (and obviously fail)
Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it writes:
I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that TeXLive is now the default.
Since I've no time to test it now, I'd like to stay with TeTeX for a
further litte while.
So I put TEX_DEFAULT=tetex in /etc/make.conf; however this does not
seem to work: portupgrade
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it writes:
I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that TeXLive is now the default.
Since I've no time to test it now, I'd like to stay with TeTeX for a
further litte while.
So I put
Hi,
The latest pkg appears to be ignoring the contents of pkg.conf.
osiris:~,6:26am# cat /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
assume_always_yes: true
osiris:~,6:29am# pkg remove gsoap
Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 1
packages in
On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:38, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it writes:
I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that TeXLive is now the default.
Since I've no time to test it now, I'd like to
Error in quagga-0.99.22.4_2 using: make install
-- partial file
=== Creating users and/or groups.
Creating group 'quagga' with gid '101'.
Creating user 'quagga' with uid '101'.
pkg-static: Unknown user: 'wheel'
pkg-static: Unknown user: 'wheel'
Installing quagga-0.99.22.4_2... done
===
===phase: stage
=== Staging for tex-formats-20120701_2
=== Generating temporary packing list
/bin/ln -fs pdftex
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:44:20PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:38, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it writes:
I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that
Hi,
portupgrade appears to be a lot slower with the pkg-1.3 when it goes
into its clean-up phase. The pkg which -q ... that portupgrade
performs during that phase appears to be taking quite a bit longer
that the older version did.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz
Reset maintainership for ports not staged with no pending PR
With hat: portmgr
-
Build ID: 20140723170801-35104
Job owner: b...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 29 hours
Enddate: Thu, 24
On 2014-07-24, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
If 'pkg version' only took a few seconds for you, I suspect you had very
few ports installed. It has always taken minutes for me.
$ pkg info|wc -l
432
Is there a reason you want to avoid using the index? It's worked just fine
for
Today I attempted to upgrade a bunch of ports with 'portmaster -a'. It
failed when it kept trying to install gnutls when I already had gnults3
installed. Turns out that the man pages conflict.
But, why was it trying to install gnutls? I am baffled. The Makefiles have
a LIB_DEPEND on libgnutls.so
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
wrote:
On 2014-07-24, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
If 'pkg version' only took a few seconds for you, I suspect you had very
few ports installed. It has always taken minutes for me.
$ pkg info|wc -l
On 07/24/2014 18:43, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Today I attempted to upgrade a bunch of ports with 'portmaster -a'. It
failed when it kept trying to install gnutls when I already had gnults3
installed. Turns out that the man pages conflict.
But, why was it trying to install gnutls? I am baffled.
Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote
in d01d7e6a-c576-4dd8-9068-fd4d2f0e4...@grem.de:
fr
fr
fr On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:38, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
fr
fr On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
fr Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it writes:
fr
fr I've
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu
wrote:
On 07/24/2014 18:43, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Today I attempted to upgrade a bunch of ports with 'portmaster -a'. It
failed when it kept trying to install gnutls when I already had gnults3
installed. Turns out that the
I am posting to freebsd-ports, but that probably isn't the right place.
I was trying to post a patch to bug 192074. I gave it the patch I
attached. But for some reason, bugzilla couldn't handle the patch to
patch-configure. This patch was created using svn diff. Bugzilla
didn't want to accept
Hi!
I am posting to freebsd-ports, but that probably isn't the right place.
I was trying to post a patch to bug 192074. I gave it the patch I
attached. But for some reason, bugzilla couldn't handle the patch to
patch-configure. This patch was created using svn diff. Bugzilla
didn't
On 07/24/2014 10:59 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I am posting to freebsd-ports, but that probably isn't the right place.
I was trying to post a patch to bug 192074. I gave it the patch I
attached. But for some reason, bugzilla couldn't handle the patch to
patch-configure. This patch was
Hi!
I can only see the patch to Makefile. I don't see any patch that
creates files/patch-configure.
And look at patch 144957. It is completely empty. But it should have
contained:
Ah, you use the bugzilla diff view. There's already a bug for that problem:
On 07/24/2014 11:15 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I can only see the patch to Makefile. I don't see any patch that
creates files/patch-configure.
And look at patch 144957. It is completely empty. But it should have
contained:
Ah, you use the bugzilla diff view. There's already a bug for
Reset maintainership for ports not staged with no pending PR
With hat: portmgr
-
Build ID: 20140723173200-3145
Job owner: b...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 35 hours
Enddate: Fri, 25 Jul
Baptiste Daroussin wrote, On 07/23/2014 16:42:
So much has happened that it is hard to summarize so I'll try to highlight the
major points:
- New solver, now pkg has a real SAT solver able to automatically handle
conflicts and dynamically discover them. (yes pkg set -o is deprecated now)
33 matches
Mail list logo
