Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:16:43 +0200 Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: I' building my ports with poudriere 3.1pre on head. The port emulators/linux_base-f10 can not be build due to a problem with one file listed in the Makefile which seems to not exist anymore (or at least not with the

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-08-15 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Ports, pkg's confusion on upgrades...

2014-08-15 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski
W dniu 2014-08-13 o 11:45, Karl Pielorz pisze: We have a number of 10.x systems now - where we install packages (aka pkg install) some components, but other components we build from ports (as we need to add / remove options that the package gives you no choice over). Initially 'pkg

Re: Ports, pkg's confusion on upgrades...

2014-08-15 Thread Karl Pielorz
--On 15 August 2014 12:52 +0200 Łukasz Wąsikowski luk...@wasikowski.net wrote: You could solve this by using your own poudriere - create repos with your own port's options and pkg upgrade everything. Your current approach - mixing packages and ports - is not supported IIRC. Thanks for the

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 15, 2014 a las 12:12:53PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger escribió: For GPLed binaries (RPMs) we have the obligation to provide the src (SRPMs). As such the src needs to be fetched on the FreeBSD ports build cluster and provided together with the binaries. I understand. On

Re: Ports, pkg's confusion on upgrades...

2014-08-15 Thread Karl Pielorz
By letting 'pkg upgrade' complete, then running 'pkg info --all -d' I was able to find out what package upgrade now requires an additional package to be INSTALLED. (In our case memcached-1.4.20_2 pkg now requires cyrus-sasl-2.1.26_8 - where as it didn't before). I still can't figure out

Re: Ports, pkg's confusion on upgrades...

2014-08-15 Thread Michael Gmelin
On 15 Aug 2014, at 14:43, Karl Pielorz kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk wrote: --On 15 August 2014 12:52 +0200 Łukasz Wąsikowski luk...@wasikowski.net wrote: You could solve this by using your own poudriere - create repos with your own port's options and pkg upgrade everything. Your current

Re: Ports, pkg's confusion on upgrades...

2014-08-15 Thread Karl Pielorz
--On 15 August 2014 15:59 +0200 Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote: If it's only about two or three ports and those are leave ports (things like nginx), mixing pkg and ports works ok in practice. This is currently the easiest option for us - I was hoping to install the ports, and just do

Bugzilla Restoration

2014-08-15 Thread Muhammad Moinur Rahman
Hi, Does anyone have any idea about possible restoration time of Bugzilla ? BR, Muhammad ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

[CFT] New upstream snapshot of mplayer and mencoder

2014-08-15 Thread Thomas Zander
Hi folks, I have prepared an update to our ports for multimedia/mplayer and mencoder. You can find the drop-in replacements (just extract it in ${PORTSDIR}/multimedia) at this url: https://people.freebsd.org/~riggs/m20140815.tar.xz Changes - Update to recent snapshot (2014-08-15) of mplayer and

Re: Does pkg automatically download INDEX?

2014-08-15 Thread Naram Qashat
On 08/12/14 14:11, Patrick Powell wrote: On 08/09/14 18:15, Naram Qashat wrote: On 08/09/14 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote: On 08/04/14 07:28, David Wolfskill wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:09:33AM -0400, Naram Qashat

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Juergen Lock
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:49:47PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Friday, August 15, 2014 a las 12:12:53PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger escribió: For GPLed binaries (RPMs) we have the obligation to provide the src (SRPMs). As such the src needs to be fetched on the FreeBSD ports build

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Juergen Lock
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 07:50:04PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:49:47PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Friday, August 15, 2014 a las 12:12:53PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger escribió: For GPLed binaries (RPMs) we have the obligation to provide the src

Cacti staged and migration issue (was Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion)

2014-08-15 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Consequently, I have no idea how to set the owner/group on those directories in stagedir. As can be seen, with some help I was able to find a solution. I also changed the patches to shebangfixes 8-} But: There's a real issue coming up in

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 19:50:04 +0200 Juergen Lock n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de wrote: So probably the 650k one should be used instead... I'm looking into this right now. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0xC773696B3BAC17DC http://www.FreeBSD.org

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 15, 2014 a las 07:50:04PM +0200, Juergen Lock escribió: I still have that file, and it's not an rpm, it's html. (attached) SHA256 (/usr/ports/distfiles/rpm/i386/fedora/10/gamin-0.1.9-6.fc10.src.rpm) = cd3be5866aae06398e919eaa412af2d92b04b63139dc1a20e8377c5bf98c0e84

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:16:52 +0200 Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Friday, August 15, 2014 a las 07:50:04PM +0200, Juergen Lock escribió: I still have that file, and it's not an rpm, it's html. (attached) SHA256

Fwd: [package - 84i386-default][cad/cura-engine] Failed for CuraEngine-14.03 in build

2014-08-15 Thread CeDeROM
Hello :-) There seems to be a problem with CAD/Cura-Engine build on FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE i386. I try to reproduce this bug on a fresh install... Build somehow requires CLANG to build, but the default compiler on 8.4 is the GCC. I did not set CLANG to be dependency, port can be built with GCC. Why

Re: Fwd: [package - 84i386-default][cad/cura-engine] Failed for CuraEngine-14.03 in build

2014-08-15 Thread Michelle Sullivan
CeDeROM wrote: Hello :-) There seems to be a problem with CAD/Cura-Engine build on FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE i386. I try to reproduce this bug on a fresh install... Build somehow requires CLANG to build, but the default compiler on 8.4 is the GCC. I did not set CLANG to be dependency, port can be

Re: Bugzilla Restoration

2014-08-15 Thread Denny Lin
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:05:20PM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: Does anyone have any idea about possible restoration time of Bugzilla ? It's working right now. Try deleting your cookies if it doesn't work. -- Denny Lin ___

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 poudriere (3.1pre)

2014-08-15 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 15, 2014 a las 11:03:11PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger escribió: I'm glad I entertained you... ;-) No, I didn't check if it was really me committing those entries. I did not checked it either. Fixed now. Would be nice if you could update and test. I did: # cd