Re: MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/

In message <4ca824b01d94b9a964553...@atuin.in.mat.cc>, Mathieu Arnold writes: > +--On 22 avril 2016 21:30:31 -0700 Cy Schubert > wrote: > | Hi, > | > | I've noticed recently that a number of ports with MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/ > | have been marked BROKEN due to being

Re: WANT_BDB_VER Ignored

Thanks, that resolves the issue. Is their a way to set the default DB version with make.conf? I tried using: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=bdb=4.8 That didn't work. I have about 50+ custom ports (crypto currency wallets need DB 4.8) that use this option and rather than manually set the DB version for

Re: FreeBSD Port: owncloud-9.0.1_1

On 28 avr. 2016, at 09:32, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Kevin Lo wrote on 04/28/2016 09:06: >> >> I added a dependency on net/pecl-smbclient and it works fine for me when >> uploading files over smb. Please give it a spin, thanks. > > Then somebody should fix it's dependency. net/pecl-smbclient

Re: Ports with X11 options

Albert Shih wrote on 04/28/2016 16:49: Hi, Some ports got a option « WITH_X11 ». I would like to known what's that mean on a server ? Can I safely disable every WITH_X11 if those software is for a server. For example, php-gd need graphics/cairo. If I disable X11 can I got some issue with

Re: Ports with X11 options

On 04/28/16 15:49, Albert Shih wrote: > Some ports got a option « WITH_X11 ». I would like to > known what's that mean on a server ? Can I safely disable every WITH_X11 if > those software is for a server. > > For example, php-gd need graphics/cairo. If I disable X11 can I got some > issue with

Ports with X11 options

Hi, Some ports got a option « WITH_X11 ». I would like to known what's that mean on a server ? Can I safely disable every WITH_X11 if those software is for a server. For example, php-gd need graphics/cairo. If I disable X11 can I got some issue with php-gd ? Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO

Re: Ports tree gone unstable?

On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis wrote: > I'd lose many hours of potential build time. Because of the > infrequent upgrades I would have to deal with all of the intervening > special cases in UPDATING that accumulated between upgrades, and the > portupgrade -fr and -a options

Re: Failure compiling java/openjdk8

On 04/28/16 07:01, Michael Jung wrote: > [...] > If you really want to try and build it on that system and have some free > disk > space you could always add a file instead of a partition as extra swap. > > Instuctions here: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/adding-swap-space.html > >

Re: Failure compiling java/openjdk8

On 2016-04-28 05:30, Willem Offermans wrote: Dear Matthias and FreeBSD friends, On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:48:16AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 23.04.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Willem Offermans: > Dear FreeBSD friends, > > In my attempt to juvenile an old FreeBSD beast, I encountered another >

Re: Ports tree gone unstable?

Don Lewis wrote: On 28 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Don Lewis wrote: I'd thought that poudriere was using the host copy of pkg to do the final part of the respository build, but since poudriere doesn't list pkg as a dependency, that appears not to be the case. It looks like poudriere is

Re: Failure compiling java/openjdk8

Dear Matthias and FreeBSD friends, On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:48:16AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 23.04.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Willem Offermans: > > Dear FreeBSD friends, > > > > In my attempt to juvenile an old FreeBSD beast, I encountered another > > hurdle: a failure compiling

Re: FreeBSD Port: owncloud-9.0.1_1

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:45:48 +0300 a...@abinet.ru wrote: > > > Please, make this optional! I don't want samba on my server. +1 -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/

FreeBSD Port: samba-virusfilter-0.1.3_1

There seems to be very little information on this port? I got it working with samba36 but it makes samba crash regularly. It doesn't appear to work with samba43 at all. Thanks, Jon. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD Port: owncloud-9.0.1_1

Please, make this optional! I don't want samba on my server. Miroslav Lachman писал 2016-04-28 10:32: > Then somebody should fix it's dependency. net/pecl-smbclient depends on > net/samba36 which is deprecated, expired 2016-04-01 and is waiting for > removal from the ports tree.

Re: FreeBSD Port: owncloud-9.0.1_1

Kevin Lo wrote on 04/28/2016 09:06: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:23PM +0200, pat...@patpro.net wrote: Hello, Hi Patrick, I'm currently trying to setup Owncloud on FreeBSD 10.2. I'm using the provided files_external app to give access to SMB shares, but it fails when I try to upload

Re: FreeBSD Port: owncloud-9.0.1_1

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:23PM +0200, pat...@patpro.net wrote: > > Hello, Hi Patrick, > I'm currently trying to setup Owncloud on FreeBSD 10.2. > I'm using the provided files_external app to give access to SMB shares, but > it fails when I try to upload files. > > looking at apache's

Re: Ports tree gone unstable?

On 28 Apr, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Don Lewis wrote: >> I'd thought that poudriere was using the host copy of pkg to do the >> final part of the respository build, but since poudriere doesn't list >> pkg as a dependency, that appears not to be the case. It looks like >> poudriere is running